Cardiovascular disease diagnoses among older women with endometrial cancer

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) shares risk factors (e.g. obesity) with cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet little research has investigated CVD diagnoses among EC survivors. We aimed to describe the burden of CVD diagnoses among older women with EC compared to women without a cancer history. Methods: Women aged 66+ years with an EC diagnosis during 2004–2017 (N = 44,386) and matched women without cancer (N = 221,219) were identified in the SEER-Medicare linked data. An index date was defined as the cancer diagnosis date of the EC case in that matched set. ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes were used to define CVD outcomes in the Medicare claims. Prevalent CVD was identified using diagnosis codes in the year before the index date. Hazard ratios (HRs) for incident CVD diagnoses after the index date were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Women with a prevalent CVD were excluded from incidence analyses for that outcome. Results: Compared to women without cancer, women with EC had a higher prevalence of CVD diagnoses at the index date. In analyses beginning follow-up at 1 year post-index date, EC survivors had an increased risk of incident CVD diagnoses including ischemic heart diseases (HR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.69–1.78), pulmonary heart disease (HR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.88–2.02), and diseases of the veins and lymphatics (HR = 2.71; 95% CI: 95% CI: 2.64–2.78). Risk of CVD diagnoses among women with EC was also elevated within the first year post-index date. Conclusions: Management of pre-existing CVD and monitoring for incident CVD may be critical during EC treatment and throughout long-term survivorship

Gynecologic cancer outcomes in the elderly poor: A population-based study

BACKGROUND Adults aged ≥65 years who are dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid are an at-risk group in health care. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the outcomes of women with gynecologic cancers in this population are unknown. METHODS The current study was a population-based cohort study of North Carolina state cancer registry cases of uterine, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar/vaginal cancers (2003-2009), with linked enrollment in Medicare and state Medicaid. Outcomes of all-cause mortality and stage of disease at the time of diagnosis were analyzed as a function of enrollment status using multivariate analysis and survival curves. RESULTS Of 4522 women aged ≥65 years (3702 of whom were enrolled in Medicare [82%] and 820 of whom were dually enrolled [18%]), there were 2286 cases of uterine (51%), 1587 cases of ovarian (35%), 302 cases of cervical (7%), and 347 cases of vulvar/vaginal (8%) cancers. Dual enrollees had increased all-cause mortality overall (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.19-1.49), and within each cancer site (uterine: aHR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.02-1.47]; ovarian: aHR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.05-1.49]; cervical: aHR, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.96-1.87]; and vulvar/vaginal: aHR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.36-2.72]). Increased odds of advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis among dual enrollees was only present in patients with uterine cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.79). Stratified survival curves demonstrated the strongest disparities among women with early-stage uterine and early-stage vulvar/vaginal cancers. CONCLUSIONS Women aged ≥65 years who were dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid were found to have an overall 34% increase in all-cause mortality after diagnosis with a gynecologic cancer compared with the non-dually enrolled Medicare population. Women with early-stage uterine and vulvar/vaginal cancers appeared to have the most disparate outcomes. Because these malignancies are generally curable, they have the most potential for benefit from targeted interventions

Patient characteristics and health system factors associated with adjuvant radiation therapy receipt in older women with early-stage endometrial cancer

Introduction: Among women with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC), age, stage, grade, and histology are used to determine fitness for adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) administration. We examined non-cancer factors associated with adjuvant RT receipt in older women with early-stage EC. Materials & methods: Using data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry program linked with Medicare claims, we identified 25,654 women (aged ≥66 years) diagnosed with first primary stage I-II EC during 2004–2017 who underwent a hysterectomy. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify adjuvant RT claims filed for the seven-month period post-hysterectomy. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to estimate adjuvant RT prevalence associated with patient characteristics and health system factors after adjustment for age, frailty, and endometrial factors. Results: Adjuvant RT was less commonly administered to Asian American and Pacific Islander patients than non-Hispanic White patients (Prevalence ratio [PR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.97). Compared to women treated in the Northeast region, women treated other regions of the US were less likely to undergo adjuvant RT (PR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.79). Residing in rural or high neighborhood-poverty counties was associated with lower adjuvant RT administration. Higher comorbidity score was not associated with reduced prevalence of adjuvant RT receipt; however, women with high probability of predicted probability of frailty were less likely to undergo adjuvant RT (PR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.81) compared to women with low probability of frailty. Women who received lymph node assessment were more likely to undergo adjuvant RT compared to women who did not (PR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.51). Women treated by a gynecologic oncologist were more likely to undergo adjuvant RT compared to women treated by a non-gynecologic oncologist (PR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.14). Adjuvant RT was more commonly administered to women treated in larger academic hospitals. Discussion: Findings suggest that various non-cancer factors affect the delivery of adjuvant RT to older women with early-stage EC in real-world oncology practice. Advancing our understanding of factors associated with adjuvant RT administration may help expand equitable access to RT

Adjuvant radiation therapy and health-related quality of life among older women with early-stage endometrial cancer: an analysis using the SEER-MHOS linkage

Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) has been associated with decreased health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in clinical trials of early-stage endometrial cancer (EC), but few studies have examined the association in real-world settings. We assessed HRQOL associated with adjuvant RT for older women with early-stage EC within a large U.S. population-based registry resource. Methods: The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results and the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey linkage (1998–2017) was used to identify women with early-stage EC aged ≥ 65 years at survey who received surgery and were diagnosed ≥ 1-year prior (n = 1,140). HRQOL was evaluated with the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) until 2006 and the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) post 2006. Ordinary least squares regression was used to estimate mean difference (MD) in T scores and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing treatment groups (surgery alone, adjuvant external beam radiation therapy [EBRT], or adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy [VBT]) after accounting for confounders using propensity score weighting. Results: Overall, RT was not associated with physical health (MD = 0.97; 95% CI = − 1.13, 3.07) or mental health (MD = − 0.78; 95% CI = − 2.60, 1.05) relative to surgery alone. In analyses by RT type, adjuvant VBT was associated with better general health on the SF-36/VR-12 subscale (MD = 3.59; 95% CI = 0.56, 6.62) relative to surgery alone. No statistically significant associations were observed for adjuvant VBT and physical or mental health, or for adjuvant EBRT and any HRQOL domain. Conclusion: Older women with early-stage EC treated with adjuvant RT did not report worse physical and mental HRQOL scores compared to those treated with surgery alone, though relevant symptoms should be evaluated further to fully understand the disease and treatment specific aspects of the HRQOL

Adverse Urinary System Diagnoses among Older Women with Endometrial Cancer

Background: Endometrial cancer and its treatment may impact urinary system function, but few large-scale studies have examined urinary diagnoses among endometrial cancer survivors. We investigated the risk of several urinary outcomes among older women with endometrial cancer compared with similar women without a cancer history. Methods: Women aged 66þ years with an endometrial cancer diagnosis during 2004–2017 (N ¼ 44,386) and women without a cancer history (N ¼ 221,219) matched 1:5 on exact age, race/ ethnicity, and state were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data. ICD-9 and -10 diagnosis codes were used to define urinary outcomes in the Medicare claims. HRs for urinary outcomes were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Relative to women without cancer, endometrial cancer survivors were at an increased risk of several urinary system diagnoses, including lower urinary tract infection [HR, 2.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.32–2.40], urinary calculus (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 2.13–2.31), renal failure (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 2.23–2.33), and chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.81–1.90). Similar associations were observed in sensitivity analyses limited to 1þ and 5þ years after endometrial cancer diagnosis. Black race, higher comorbidity index, higher stage or grade cancer, non-endometrioid histology, and treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation were often significant predictors of urinary outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, among older women, the risk of urinary outcomes is elevated after endometrial cancer. Impact: Monitoring for urinary diseases may be a critical part of long-term survivorship care for older women with an endometrial cancer history

Examining urban and rural differences in how distance to care influences the initiation and completion of treatment among insured cervical cancer patients

Background: Although rural cancer patients encounter substantial barriers to care, they more often report receiving timely care than urban patients. We examined whether geographic distance, a contributor to urban-rural health disparities, differentially influences treatment initiation and completion among insured urban and rural cervical cancer patients. Methods: We identified women diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2013 from a statewide cancer registry linked to multipayer, insurance claims. Primary outcomes were initiation of guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis and, among stage IB2-IVA cancer patients, completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in 56 days. We estimated risk ratios using modified Poisson regressions, stratified by urban/rural status, to examine the association between distance and treatment timing (initiation or completion). Results: Among 999 stage IA-IVA patients, 48% initiated guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis, and 37% of 492 stage IB2-IVA cancer patients completed CCRT in 56 days. In urban areas, stage IA-IVA patients who lived 15 miles from the nearest treatment facility were less likely to initiate timely treatment compared with those <5 miles [risk ratio (RR): 0.72; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.54-0.95]. Among IB2-IVA stage cancer patients, rural women residing 15 miles from the nearest radiation facility were more likely to complete CCRT in 56 days (RR: 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-5.51). Conclusions: Geographic distance differentially influences the initiation and completion of treatment among urban and rural cervical cancer patients. Impact: Distance was an access barrier for insured cervical cancer patients in urban areas whereas rural patients may require more intensive outreach, support, and resources, even among those living closer to treatment

Evaluating the urban-rural paradox: The complicated relationship between distance and the receipt of guideline-concordant care among cervical cancer patients

Objective: Urban-rural health disparities are often attributed to the longer distances rural patients travel to receive care. However, a recent study suggests that distance to care may affect urban and rural cancer patients differentially. We examined whether this urban-rural paradox exists among patients with cervical cancer. Methods: We identified individuals diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2013 using a statewide cancer registry linked to multi-payer, insurance claims. Our primary outcome was receipt of guideline-concordant care: surgery for stages IA1–IB1; external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), concomitant chemotherapy, and brachytherapy for stages IB2–IVA. We estimated risk ratios (RR) using modified Poisson regressions, stratified by urban/rural location, to examine the association between distance to nearest facility and receipt of treatment. Results: 62% of 999 cervical cancer patients received guideline-concordant care. The association between distance and receipt of care differed by type of treatment. In urban areas, cancer patients who lived ≥15 miles from the nearest surgical facility were less likely to receive primary surgical management compared to those <5 miles from the nearest surgical facility (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60–0.98). In rural areas, patients living ≥15 miles from the nearest brachytherapy facility were more likely to receive treatment compared to those <5 miles from the nearest brachytherapy facility (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.14–2.58). Distance was not associated with the receipt of chemotherapy or EBRT. Conclusions: Among cervical cancer patients, there is evidence supporting the urban-rural paradox, i.e., geographic distance to cancer care facilities is not consistently associated with treatment receipt in expected or consistent ways. Healthcare systems must consider the diverse and differential barriers encountered by urban and rural residents to improve access to high quality cancer care

Preoperative quality of life and surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology patients: A new predictor of operative risk?

Quality of life (QoL) for women with gynecologic malignancies is predictive of chemotherapy related toxicity and overall survival but has not been studied in relation to surgical outcomes and hospital readmissions. Our goal was to evaluate the association between baseline, pre-operative QoL measures and 30-day post-operative morbidity and health resource utilization by gynecologic oncology patients

Extended Human Papillomavirus Genotyping to Predict Progression to High-Grade Cervical Precancer: A Prospective Cohort Study in the Southeastern United States

Background: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing (HPV16; else HPV18/45; else HPV31/33/35/52/58; else HPV39/ is utilized in primary cervical cancer screening, generally along with 51/56/59/68). cytology, to triage abnormalities to colposcopy. Most screening-Results: At enrollment, median participant age was 30.1 years; based hrHPV testing involves pooled detection of any hrHPV or of most (63%) were hrHPV-positive. Over follow-up, 24 participants HPV16/18. Cervical neoplasia progression risks based on extended progressed to CIN2þ (7.0%). CIN2þ IR among hrHPV-positive hrHPV genotyping—particularly non-16/18 hrHPV types—are not participants was 3.4/1,000 person-months. CIN2þ IRs were highest well characterized. HPV genotype-specific incidence of high-grade for HPV16 (8.3), HPV33 (7.8), and HPV58 (4.9). Five-year CIN2þ cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or more severe (CIN2þ) following risk was higher for HPV16 (0.34) compared with HPV18/45 (0.12), an abnormal screening result was examined. HPV31/33/35/52/58 (0.12), and HPV39/51/56/59/68 (0.16) (P ¼ 0.05). Methods: We assessed a US-based prospective, multiracial, Conclusions: Non-16/18 hrHPV types are associated with difclinical cohort of 343 colposcopy patients with normal histology ferential CIN2þ progression rates. HPV16, 33, and 58 exhibited the (n ¼ 226) or CIN1 (n ¼ 117). Baseline cervical samples underwent highest rates over 5 years. HPV risk groups warrant further invesHPV DNA genotyping, and participants were followed up to 5 years. tigation in diverse US populations. Genotype-specific CIN2þ incidence rates (IR) were estimated with Impact: These novel data assessing extended HPV genotyping in accelerated failure time models. Five-year CIN2þ risks were estia diverse clinical cohort can inform future directions to improve mated nonparametrically for hierarchical hrHPV risk groups screening practices in the general population

Differences in the microbial profiles of early stage endometrial cancers between Black and White women

Objective: Black women suffer a higher mortality from endometrial cancer (EC) than White women. Potential biological causes for this disparity include a higher prevalence of obesity and more lethal histologic/molecular subtypes. We hypothesize that another biological factor driving this racial disparity could be the EC microbiome. Methods: Banked tumor specimens of postmenopausal, Black and White women undergoing hysterectomy for early stage endometrioid EC were identified. The microbiota of the tumors were characterized by bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing. The microbial component of endometrioid ECs in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were assessed for comparison. Results: 95 early stage ECs were evaluated: 23 Black (24%) and 72 White (76%). Microbial diversity was increased (p < 0.001), and Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria and OD1 phyla abundance was higher in tumors from Black versus White women (p < 0.001). Genus level abundance of Dietzia and Geobacillus were found to be lower in tumors of obese Black versus obese White women (p < 0.001). Analysis of early stage ECs in TCGA found that microbial diversity was higher in ECs from Black versus White women (p < 0.05). When comparing ECs from obese Black versus obese White women, 5 bacteria distributions were distinct, with higher abundance of Lactobacillus acidophilus in ECs from Black women being the most striking difference. Similarly in TCGA, Dietzia and Geobacillus were more common in ECs from White women compared to Black. Conclusion: Increased microbial diversity and the distinct microbial profiles between ECs of obese Black versus obese White women suggests that intra-tumoral bacteria may contribute to EC disparities and pathogenesis