Less Anterior Knee Pain with a Mobile-bearing Prosthesis Compared with a Fixed-bearing Prosthesis

Anterior knee pain is one of the major short-term complaints after TKA. Since the introduction of the mobile-bearing TKA, numerous studies have attempted to confirm the theoretical advantages of a mobile-bearing TKA over a fixed-bearing TKA but most show little or no actual benefits. The concept of self-alignment for the mobile bearing suggests the posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing TKA would provide a lower incidence of anterior knee pain compared with a fixed-bearing TKA. We therefore asked whether the posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee would in fact reduce anterior knee pain. We randomized 103 patients scheduled for cemented three-component TKA for osteoarthrosis in a prospective, double-blind clinical trial. With a 1-year followup, more patients experienced persistent anterior knee pain in the posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing group (10 of 53, 18.9%) than in the posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing group (two of 47, 4.3%). No differences were observed for range of motion, visual analog scale for pain, Oxford 12-item questionnaire, SF-36, or the American Knee Society score. The posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee therefore seems to provide a short-term advantage compared with the posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing knee

Progress towards understanding anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty

Met het onderzoek dat beschreven is in dit proefschrift wordt beoogd een beter begrip te krijgen van voorste kniepijn (VKP) na plaatsing van een totale knieprothese (TKP). Dit is gedaan door de volgende vragen te beantwoorden: Welke structuren voor in de knie spelen een rol bij de aanwezigheid van VKP? Welke vragenlijst is geschikt om VKP na een TKP te meten? Heeft een TKP met een mobiel lager een gunstig effect op de afwezigheid van VKP vergeleken met een TKP met een vast lager? Kan het mobiele lager een afwijkende plaatsing van de TKP corrigeren

Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty

Background In 1998, the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire was developed by Dawson et al. as a self-administered disease- and site-specific questionnaire, specifically developed for knee arthroplasty patients. Since then, it has proven to be an effective outcome questionnaire, and is widely used. Despite the positive psychometric properties for the Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) population, the 12-item knee questionnaire has only been translated into a few languages. We thus translated and validated the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for the Dutch population. Methods and results After translation according to a forward/backward protocol, 174 knee arthroplasty patients were asked to answer the questionnaire together with an SF-36, an AKSS and a VAS. The reliability, validity, content validity and the sensitivity to change were all tested. Our Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire achieved excellent scores in all of these properties. Interpretation The Dutch Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire proved to be an excellent evaluation instrument for the Dutch orthopedic surgeon and can be used for all total knee arthroplasty patient

No difference in anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after 7.9 years

The presence of anterior knee pain remains one of the major complaints following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Since the introduction of the mobile TKA, many studies have been performed and only a few show a slight advantage for the mobile. In our short-term follow-up study, we found less anterior knee pain in the posterior stabilized mobile knees compared to the posterior stabilized knees. The concept of self-alignment and the results from our short-term study led us to form the hypothesis that the posterior stabilized mobile knee leads to a lower incidence of anterior knee pain compared to the posterior stabilized fixed knee. This study was designed to see whether this difference remains after 7.9 years in the follow-up. A secondary line of enquiry was to see whether one was superior to the other regarding pain, function, quality of life and survival. This current report is a 6-10-year (median 7.9 years) follow-up study of the remaining 69 patients with a cemented three-component TKA for osteoarthritis in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. In the posterior stabilized group, five of the 40 knees (13%) versus five of the 29 posterior stabilized mobile group (17%) experienced anterior knee pain. No differences were observed with regard to ROM, VAS, Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire, SF-36, HSS patella, Kujala or the AKSS score. Patients with anterior knee pain reported more pain, lower levels of the AKSS, HSS patella and the Kujala scores than the patients without anterior knee pain. In the current clinical practice, the appearance of anterior knee pain persists as a problem; simply changing to a mobile bearing does not seem to be the solution. The posterior stabilized mobile total knee did not sustain the advantage of less anterior knee pain, compared with the posterior stabilized fixed total knee arthroplasty. Therapeutic study, Level I

Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form

BACKGROUND: For knee-related surgery, there is a great demand for internationally useable subjective scoring systems. Before such measurements can be used, they should be translated and validated for the population they are used on. For the Dutch population, only the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Oxford 12 Questionnaire have been validated. However, these scores can only be used regarding osteoarthritis of the knee. In 2001, the International Knee Documentation Committee presented the Subjective Knee Form, which is a knee-specific rather than a disease-specific questionnaire. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis/symptom prevalence); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: The authors describe the translation procedure and validation of the Dutch Subjective Knee Form. After a forward-backward translation protocol, the reliability, validity, and content validity were tested. The responses of 145 consecutive knee patients on 2 questionnaires containing the Short Form-36, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Oxford 12 Questionnaire score, a visual analog scale, and the Dutch International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form were used. Reliability was tested by measuring the test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Validity was tested by correlating the questionnaire to the other outcome measurements, and content validity was tested by measuring the floor and ceiling effects. RESULTS: The reliability proved excellent with an intraclass coefficient of 0.96 for test-retest. Internal consistency was strong (Cronbach alpha, .92). The construct, convergent, and divergent validities were good. The content validity was good; no floor or ceiling effect occurred. CONCLUSION: The validation procedure shows that the Dutch International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form is an excellent evaluation instrument for Dutch patients with knee-related injurie

The important predictors of cycling use in three groups of knee patients

Cycling is a popular international professional and recreational sport performed by both sexes and all age groups. Regular exercise is important for the elderly population and it has been shown that cycling is of great value for the osteoarthritis and knee arthroplasty patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictors of cycle use in three groups of knee patients.  We included 298 patients, 93 patients had osteoarthritis of the knee, 118 received a total knee arthroplasty and 87 had a meniscal and/or ligamentous injury. Patients were evaluated at the outpatient clinic and asked to complete the SF36-, Oxford 12-item-, IKDC-questionnaire and a specific cycling questionnaire.  As the patient gets older, the chances of being able to cycle decrease by 5% every year. The chance to be able to cycle is 1.98 times higher for a male patient compared to a female patient. The chances of experiencing pain while cycling increases by 8% per unit rise of BMI.  Age and sex, and not the clinical diagnosis, are the predictors of the ability of a patient to cycle. An increased BMI is the only risk factor found for experiencing pain while cyclin

Dutch translation of the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale and validation in patients after knee arthroplasty

To translate and validate the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and evaluate the internal consistency, construct validity and ceiling or floor effect. After standard forward and backward translation was performed, 302 patients who have received a TKA or UKA filled out the AKPS together with Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) patella score, visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, the Oxford 12-item questionnaire and the SF-36 at follow-up. The internal consistency was tested using Cronbach's α coefficient. The construct validity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation (R) to test for correlations between the AKPS and VAS HSS, HSS patella score, VAS month, Oxford 12-item questionnaire and SF-36 subscales. Ceiling or floor effects are given in percentage of patients giving a maximum or minimum score. The internal reliability of the AKPS is acceptable with a Cronbach's α of 0.81 in patients after TKA or UKA. A high correlation was found between the AKPS and the Oxford 12-item questionnaire (R = 0.81). Moderate correlations were found with the VAS month (R = 0.63), HSS patella score (R = 0.51) and SF-36 subscales physical functioning (R = 0.59), role-physical (R = 0.59), bodily pain (R = 0.57). Other correlations were poor, therefore indicating a good convergent and divergent validity. Ceiling effects were observed for the HSS patella score (31 %), VAS HSS (51 %), VAS pain (19 %), SF36-RP (46 %), SF36-RE (80 %) and SF36-BP (24 %). No ceiling or floor effect was found for the AKPS, Oxford 12-item and the other SF36 domains. The AKPS appears to be reliable and valid in patients after knee arthroplasty, with no ceiling and floor effects, and can be used to assess anterior knee pain in patient who underwent joint replacement surger