3,318 research outputs found
JiĆĂ Menzelâs treatment of sacrifice
The paper explores the philosophical treatment of sacrifice in four of JiĆĂ Menzelâs films of the 1960âs, Closely observed trains (OstĆe sledovanĂ© vlaky), Capricious summer (RozmarnĂ© lĂ©to), Mr Balthazarâs death (Smrt pana Baltazara), his short film contribution to the anthology film of the New Wave, Pearls of the deep (PerliÄky na dnÄ), and Larks on a string (SkĆivĂĄnci na niti). The paper argues that Menzel problematizes romanticized versions of messianic sacrifice as they all too easily disregard the moral significance of mundane relations. By analysing the treatment of sacrifice in each of these films, the paper makes a case for the significance of Menzelâs treatment of sacrifice for current philosophical debates
Surfing like a girl:A critique of feminine embodied movement in surfing
This article explores the position of women in the sport of surfing. I contend that within surfing there remain many forms of oppression that have not been given appropriate attention in feminist studies. In this article I apply Iris Marion Young's analysis from âThrowing Like a Girlâ to the sport of surfing. Young's article offers many insights into forms of domination and oppression that pervade the sport, and that are demonstrated through the restricted movement of female surfers. I conclude by making suggestions for how to address these issues in surfing through a greater promotion of bigâwave surfing.</jats:p
Monopole Bubbling via String Theory
In this paper, we propose a string theory description of generic 't Hooft
defects in supersymmetric gauge theories. We show that
the space of supersymmetric ground states is given by the moduli space of
singular monopoles and that in this setting, Kronheimer's correspondence is
realized as T-duality. We conjecture that this brane configuration can be used
to study the full dynamics of monopole bubbling.Comment: 46 pages plus Appendi
The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner
We give a brief overview of the string landscape and techniques used to
construct string compactifications. We then explain how this motivates the
notion of the swampland and review a number of conjectures that attempt to
characterize theories in the swampland. We also compare holography in the
context of superstrings with the similar, but much simpler case of topological
string theory. For topological strings, there is a direct definition of
topological gravity based on a sum over a "quantum gravitational foam." In this
context, holography is the statement of an identification between a gravity and
gauge theory, both of which are defined independently of one another. This
points to a missing corner in string dualities which suggests the search for a
direct definition of quantum theory of gravity rather than relying on its
strongly coupled holographic dual as an adequate substitute (Based on TASI 2017
lectures given by C. Vafa)
Strange Loops: Apparent versus Actual Human Involvement in Automated Decision-Making
The era of AI-based decision-making fast approaches, and anxiety is mounting about when, and why, we should keep âhumans in the loopâ (âHITLâ). Thus far, commentary has focused primarily on two questions: whether, and when, keeping humans involved will improve the results of decision-making (making them safer or more accurate), and whether, and when, non-accuracy-related valuesâlegitimacy, dignity, and so forthâare vindicated by the inclusion of humans in decision-making. Here, we take up a related but distinct question, which has eluded the scholarship thus far: does it matter if humans appear to be in the loop of decision-making, independent from whether they actually are? In other words, what is stake in the disjunction between whether humans in fact have ultimate authority over decision-making versus whether humans merely seem, from the outside, to have such authority?
Our argument proceeds in four parts. First, we build our formal model, enriching the HITL question to include not only whether humans are actually in the loop of decision-making, but also whether they appear to be so. Second, we describe situations in which the actuality and appearance of HITL align: those that seem to involve human judgment and actually do, and those that seem automated and actually are. Third, we explore instances of misalignment: situations in which systems that seem to involve human judgment actually do not, and situations in which systems that hold themselves out as automated actually rely on humans operating âbehind the curtain.â Fourth, we examine the normative issues that result from HITL misalignment, arguing that it challenges individual decision-making about automated systems and complicates collective governance of automation
- âŠ