10 research outputs found

    Study of f_0(980) and f_0(1500) from B_s \to f_0(980)K, f_0(1500)K Decays

    Full text link
    In this paper, we calculate the branching ratios and CP-violating asymmetries for \bar B^0_s \to f_0(980)K, f_0(1500)K within Perturbative QCD approach based on k_T factorization. If the mixing angle Ξ\theta falls into the range of 25^\circ<\theta<40^\circ, the branching ratio of \bar B^0_s\to f_0(980)K is 2.0\times 10^{-6}<{\cal B}(\bar B^0_s\to f_0(980)K)<2.6\times 10^{-6}, while Ξ\theta lies in the range of 140^\circ<\theta<165^\circ, {\cal B}(\bar B^0_s\to f_0(980)K) is about 6.5\times 10^{-7}. As to the decay {\cal B}(\bar B^0_s\to f_0(1500)K), when the mixing scheme \mid f_0(1500)>=0.84\mid s\bar s>-0.54\mid n\bar n> for f_0(1500) is used, it is difficult to determine which scenario is more preferable than the other one from the branching ratios for these two scenarios, because they are both close to 1.0\times10^{-6}. But there exists large difference in the form factor F^{\bar B_s^0\to f_0(1500)} for two scenarios.Comment: 14 pages, 3 figures, submitted to J. Phys.

    Charmless hadronic Bc→VA,AAB_c \to VA, AA decays in the perturbative QCD approach

    Full text link
    In this work, we calculate the branching ratios (BRs) and the polarization fractions of sixty two charmless two-body BcB_c meson decays into final states involving one vector and one axial-vector meson (VAVA) or two axial-vector mesons(AAAA) within the framework of perturbative QCD (pQCD) approach systematically, where AA is either a 3P1^3P_1 or 1P1^1P_1 axial-vector meson. All considered decay channels can only occur through the annihilation topologies in the standard model. Based on the perturbative calculations and phenomenological analysis, we find the following results: (i) the CP-averaged BRs of the considered sixty two BcB_c decays are in the range of 10−510^{-5} to 10−910^{-9}; (ii) since the behavior for 1P1^1P_1 meson is much different from that of 3P1^3P_1 meson, the BRs of Bc→A(1P1)(V,A(1P1))B_c \to A(^1P_1) (V, A(^1P_1)) decays are generally larger than that of Bc→A(3P1)(V,A(3P1))B_c \to A(^3P_1) (V, A(^3P_1)) decays in the pQCD approach; (iii) many considered decays modes, such as Bc→a1(1260)+ωB_c\to a_1(1260)^+ \omega, b1(1235)ρb_1(1235) \rho, etc, have sizable BRs within the reach of the LHCb experiments; (iv) the longitudinal polarization fractions of most considered decays are large and play the dominant role; (v) the pQCD predictions for several decays involving mixtures of 3P1^3P_1 and/or 1P1^1P_1 mesons are highly sensitive to the values of the mixing angles, which will be tested by the ongoing LHC and forthcoming Super-B experiments; (vi) the CP-violating asymmetries of these considered BcB_c decays are absent in the standard model because only one type tree operator is involved.Comment: 31 pages, 1 figur

    eta_c production at the Large Hadron Collider

    Full text link
    We have studied the production of the 1S_0 charmonium state, eta_c, at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in the framework of Non-Relativistic Quantum Chromodynamics (NRQCD) using heavy-quark symmetry. We find that NRQCD predicts a large production cross-section for this resonance at the LHC even after taking account the small branching ratio of eta_c into two photons. We show that it will be possible to test NRQCD through its predictions for eta_c, with the statistics that will be achieved at the early stage of the LHC, running at a center of mass energy of 7 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 100 pb^{-1}Comment: 8 pages, 2 figure

    Theoretical issues in J/psi suppression

    Full text link
    Two decades ago Matsui and Satz suggested that Debye screening in the quark-gluon plasma would result in J/psi suppression in heavy ion collisions. Much has happened in the subsequent years, and the picture of quark-gluon plasma at present is rapidly evolving - what does it imply for the J/psi suppression? What are the recent RHIC and SPS results trying to tell us? What else has to be done? This talk is an attempt to address these questions.Comment: 8 pages, 6 figures, invited plenary talk at Quark Matter -2006, Shanghai, China, November 14-20, 200

    pQCD Calculations of Heavy Quark and J/psi Production

    Full text link
    We review the present status of theoretical predictions for both closed (J/psi) and open heavy quark production in high energy collisions, and their comparisons to experimental data.Comment: 8 pages, invited talk given at Quark Matter 2006, Shanghai, China, 14-20 November 200

    gDs∗DK∗(892)g_{D^{\ast}_{s}D K^{\ast}(892)} and gBs∗BK∗(892)g_{B^{\ast}_{s}B K^{\ast}(892)} coupling constants in QCD sum rules

    Full text link
    The coupling constants gDs∗DK∗(892)g_{D^{\ast}_{s}D K^{\ast}(892)} and gBs∗BK∗(892)g_{B^{\ast}_{s}B K^{\ast}(892)} are calculated in the framework of three-point QCD sum rules. The correlation functions responsible for these coupling constants are evaluated considering contributions of both D(B)D(B) and K∗(892)K^*(892) mesons as off-shell states, but in the absence of radiative corrections. The results, gDs∗DK∗(892)=(4.31±1.42)GeV−1g_{D^{\ast}_{s}D K^{\ast}(892)}=(4.31\pm1.42) GeV^{-1} and gBs∗BK∗(892)=(3.24±1.08)GeV−1g_{B^{\ast}_{s}B K^{\ast}(892)}=(3.24\pm1.08) GeV^{-1} are obtained for the considered strong coupling constants.Comment: 13 Pages and 11 Figure
    corecore