Acyline: the first study in humans of a potent, new gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist

Acyline is a novel GnRH antagonist found in animal studies to be a potent suppressor of circulating gonadotropin and testosterone (T) levels. We conducted the first study of acyline administration to humans. Eight healthy, eugonadal young men were administered a series of acyline injections (0, 2.5, 7.5, 25, and 75 microg/kg), each injection separated by at least 10 d. Serum FSH, LH, and T levels were measured for 7 d after injections. Acyline suppressed FSH, LH, and T levels in a dose-dependent fashion. Maximal suppression occurred after injection of 75 microg/kg acyline, which suppressed FSH to 46.9 +/- 2.5%, LH to 12.4 +/- 2.2%, and T to 13.4 +/- 1.4% of baseline levels, maintaining suppression for over 48 h. Serum acyline levels peaked at 1 h at 18.9 +/- 0.9 ng/ml, remained significantly elevated above background 7 d after injection, and returned to background levels by 14-17 d after injection. Side-effects at the site of injection were limited to infrequent blush and pruritus that resolved within 90 min of injection. Higher doses of acyline might be effective as depot injections for long-lasting gonadotropin suppression in hormone-dependent diseases and for use in male hormonal contraception regimens

A lower dosage levonorgestrel and testosterone combination effectively suppresses spermatogenesis and circulating gonadotropin levels with fewer metabolic effects than higher dosage combinations

Studies using exogenous high-dosage testosterone (T) or a combination regimen of physiologic T plus high-dosage levonorgestrel (LNG) administration in normal men have shown that oligoazoospermia (<3 million/mL) or azoospermia can be achieved in the majority of the men. However, these hormonal regimens have been associated with significant weight gain and suppression of serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. We hypothesized that a combination of physiologic exogenous testosterone and lower dosage LNG would result in uniform severe oligoazoospermia or azoospermia in normal men but would cause fewer adverse metabolic side effects. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trial comparing 6 months of T enanthate (100 mg IM, weekly) plus LNG, 125 microg by mouth, daily (LNG 125; n = 18) or LNG, 250 microg by mouth, daily (LNG 250; n = 18) and compared these regimens with our previous study of the same dosage of T enanthate combined with placebo LNG (LNG 0; n = 18) or with 500 mg of LNG (LNG= 500; n = 18). All three combination regimens of T enanthate and LNG suppressed spermatogenesis more rapidly and resulted in significantly more uniform severe oligoazoospermia (<1 million/mL) than the T-alone regimen. Severe oligoazoospermia was achieved in 89% of the LNG 125, 89% of the LNG 250, and 78% of the LNG 500 groups, respectively, versus 56% of the men in LNG 0 (P < 0.05 for the combination groups vs. LNG 0), but there were no significant differences between the combination regimens (P = NS). All four groups gained significant weight compared with their baselines, although the gain tended to be greater as the dosage of LNG increased (2.0+/-0.9, 2.9+/-1.1, 3.6+/-1.0, and 5.4+/-1.0 kg gained, compared with baseline in the LNG 0, 125, 250, and 500 groups respectively; P < 0.05 compared with baseline). Serum levels of HDL cholesterol decreased in all of the groups, but the effect was larger as the dosage of LNG increased (4+/-4% vs. 13+/-4%, 20+/-3%, and 22+/-4% decrease in HDL levels from baseline in the LNG 0, LNG 125, LNG 250, and LNG 500 groups respectively; P = 0.06 for LNG 125 compared with LNG 0, and P < 0.05 for LNG 250 and LNG 500 compared with LNG 0). We conclude that 1) the combination of physiologic exogenous T enanthate and LNG suppresses spermatogenesis more effectively than T enanthate alone and that 2) the combination regimen of T enanthate plus lower dosage LNG suppresses sperm production comparably to T enanthate plus higher dosage LNG, while causing less weight gain and HDL cholesterol suppression. A combination regimen of physiologic testosterone plus a low dosage of levonorgestrel offers great promise as a safe and effective male contraceptive regimen

Daily testosterone and gonadotropin levels are similar in azoospermic and nonazoospermic normal men administered weekly testosterone: implications for male contraceptive development

Weekly intramuscular administration of testosterone esters such as testosterone enanthate (TE) suppresses gonadotropins and spermatogenesis and has been studied as a male contraceptive. For unknown reasons, however, some men fail to achieve azoospermia with such regimens. We hypothesized that either 1) daily circulating serum fluoroimmunoreactive gonadotropins were higher or testosterone levels were lower during the weekly injection interval, or 2) monthly circulating bioactive gonadotropin levels were higher in nonazoospermic men. We therefore analyzed daily testosterone and fluoroimmunoreactive gonadotropin levels as well as pooled monthly bioactive and fluoroimmunoreactive gonadotropin levels in normal men receiving chronic TE injections and correlated these levels with sperm production. After a 3-month control period, 51 normal men were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular TE at 25 mg (n = 10), 50 mg (n = 9), 100 mg (n = 10), 300 mg (n = 10), or placebo (n = 12) weekly for 6 months. After 5 months of testosterone administration, morning testosterone and fluoroimmunoreactive follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were measured daily for a 1-week period between TE injections. In addition, fluoroimmunoreactive and bioactive FSH and LH levels were measured in pooled monthly blood samples drawn just before the next TE injection. In the 100-mg and 300-mg TE groups, mean monthly fluoroimmunoreactive FSH and LH levels were suppressed by 86%-97%, bioactive FSH and LH levels by 62%-80%, and roughly half the subjects became azoospermic. In the 1-week period of month 6, daily testosterone levels between TE injections were within the normal range in men receiving placebo, or 25 or 50 mg of weekly TE, but were significantly elevated in men receiving 100 or 300 mg of weekly TE. At no point during treatment, however, were there significant differences in daily testosterone or fluoroimmunoreactive gonadotropin levels, or monthly bioactive gonadotropin levels between men achieving azoospermia and those with persistent spermatogenesis. This study, therefore, demonstrates that neither monthly nor daily differences in serum testosterone, or fluoroimmunoreactive or bioactive gonadotropins explain why some men fail to completely suppress their sperm counts to zero with weekly TE administration. Innate differences in the testicle's ability to maintain spermatogenesis in a low-gonadotropin environment may explain persistent spermatogenesis in some men treated with androgen-based contraceptive regimens