Surgery Due to Inflammatory Bowel Disease During Pregnancy : Mothers and Offspring Outcomes From an Ecco Confer Multicentre Case Series (Scar Study)

i) To evaluate the evolution of pregnancies and offspring after inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) surgery during pregnancy; and ii) to describe the indications, the surgical techniques, and the frequency of caesarean section concomitant to surgery.Patients operated on due to IBD during pregnancy after 1998 were included. Participating clinicians were asked to review their databases to identify cases. Data on patients' demographics, IBD characteristics, medical treatments, IBD activity, pregnancy outcomes, surgery, delivery, foetal and maternal outcomes, were recorded.Forty-four IBD patients were included, 75% had Crohn's disease. Eighteen percent of the surgeries were performed in the 1 st trimester, 55% in the 2 nd, and 27% in the 3 rd trimester. One patient had complications during surgery, and 27% had postsurgical complications. No patient died. Seventy percent of deliveries were carried out by caesarean section. There were 40 newborns alive and 4 miscarriages/stillbirths (1 in the 1 st, 2 in the 2 nd, and 1 in the 3 rd trimester): 2 occurred during surgery, and another 2 occurred 2 weeks after surgery. Fourteen percent of the surgeries during the 2 nd trimester and 64% of those in the 3 rd trimester ended up with a simultaneous cesarean section or vaginal delivery. Of the 40 newborns, 61% were premature, and 47% had low birth weight; 42% of newborns needed hospitalisation (25% in the intensive care unit).IBD surgery during pregnancy remains an extremely serious situation. Therefore, surgical management should be performed in a multidisciplinary team, involving gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons, obstetricians and neonatal specialists

The knowledge and skills needed to perform intestinal ultrasound for inflammatory bowel diseases—An international Delphi consensus survey

Background: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive modality for monitoring disease activity in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). IUS training currently lacks well-defined standards and international consensus on competency criteria. Aim: To achieve international consensus on what competencies should be expected from a newly certified IUS practitioner. Methods: A three-round, iterative Delphi process was conducted among 54 IUS experts from 17 countries. Round 1 was a brainstorming phase with an open-ended question to identify the knowledge and skills that experts believe a newly certified IUS practitioner should possess. The experts' suggestions were then organised into statements by a Steering Committee. In round 2, the experts commented upon and rated the statements, which were revised accordingly. In round 3, the experts rated the revised statements. Statements meeting the pre-defined consensus criterion of at least 70% agreement were included in the final list of statements. Results: In total, 858 items were suggested by the experts in the first round. Based on these suggestions, 55 statements were organised into three categories: knowledge, technical skills and interpretation skills. After the second round, 53 revised statements remained. After the final round, a total of 41 statements had achieved consensus. Conclusions: We established international, expert consensus on the knowledge and skills that should be expected from newly certified IUS practitioners. These consensus statements are the first step towards mastery learning for IUS training. Educators can utilise these statements to design training programmes and evaluate the competencies of trainees before they engage in independent practice

Accuracy and User Acceptability of 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring by a Prototype Cuffless Multi-Sensor Device Compared to a Conventional Oscillometric Device

Objective 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24ABPM) is state of the art in out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Due to discomfort and technical limitations related to cuff-based 24ABPM devices, methods for non-invasive and continuous estimation of BP without the need for a cuff have gained interest. The main aims of the present study were to compare accuracy of a pulse arrival time (PAT) based BP-model and user acceptability of a prototype cuffless multi-sensor device (cuffless device), developed by Aidee Health AS, with a conventional cuff-based oscillometric device (ReferenceBP) during 24ABPM. Methods Ninety-five normotensive and hypertensive adults underwent simultaneous 24ABPM with the cuffless device on the chest and a conventional cuff-based oscillometric device on the non-dominant arm. PAT was calculated using the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors incorporated in the chest-worn device. The cuffless device recorded continuously, while ReferenceBP measurements were taken every 20 minutes during daytime and every 30 minutes during nighttime. Two-minute PAT-based BP predictions corresponding to the ReferenceBP measurements were compared with ReferenceBP measurements using paired t-tests, bias, and limits of agreement. Results Mean (SD) of ReferenceBP compared to PAT-based daytime and nighttime systolic BP (SBP) were 129.7 (13.8) mmHg versus 133.6 (20.9) mmHg and 113.1 (16.5) mmHg versus 131.9 (23.4) mmHg. Ninety-five % limits of agreements were [-26.7, 34.6 mmHg] and [-20.9, 58.4 mmHg] for daytime and nighttime SBP respectively. The cuffless device was reported to be significantly more comfortable and less disturbing than the ReferenceBP device during 24ABPM. Conclusions In the present study, we demonstrated that a general PAT-based BP model had unsatisfactory agreement with ambulatory BP during 24ABPM, especially during nighttime. If sufficient accuracy can be achieved, cuffless BP devices have promising potential for clinical assessment of BP due to the opportunities provided by continuous BP measurements during real-life conditions and high user acceptability