2 research outputs found

    Surveillance of zoonotic bacteria in finishing pigs in The Netherlands

    Get PDF
    In The Netherlands, from 1998 till 2002, a surveillance programme for zoonotic bacteria in finishing pigs was conducted at herd level. In 2000-2002, the prevalence of Salmonella spp. approximated 30%, while a significantly decreasing trend was observed when standardizing data for herdsize, age and quarter of sampling. Serotype discrimination showed the predominance of S. Typhimurium with an increasing role for phage type DT104. Prevalence estimates for Campylobacter spp. were 97% in 1998 (4th quarter only) and 45% in 1999. For STEC O157, prevalence estimates were 2% and 0% in 1998 and 1999, respectively. By using the samples from this study, a comparison study was conducted in which three different selective enrichment media, i.e. RV, MSRV and DIASALM, were compared for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from pig feces. Both MSRV and DIASALM scored significantly better compared to RV. By using logistic regression analysis of farm and herd specific data, potential risk factors for Salmonella spp. in finishing pig herds were identified and quantified

    Surveillance of zoonotic bacteria in finishing pigs in The Netherlands

    No full text
    In The Netherlands, from 1998 till 2002, a surveillance programme for zoonotic bacteria in finishing pigs was conducted at herd level. In 2000-2002, the prevalence of Salmonella spp. approximated 30%, while a significantly decreasing trend was observed when standardizing data for herdsize, age and quarter of sampling. Serotype discrimination showed the predominance of S. Typhimurium with an increasing role for phage type DT104. Prevalence estimates for Campylobacter spp. were 97% in 1998 (4th quarter only) and 45% in 1999. For STEC O157, prevalence estimates were 2% and 0% in 1998 and 1999, respectively. By using the samples from this study, a comparison study was conducted in which three different selective enrichment media, i.e. RV, MSRV and DIASALM, were compared for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from pig feces. Both MSRV and DIASALM scored significantly better compared to RV. By using logistic regression analysis of farm and herd specific data, potential risk factors for Salmonella spp. in finishing pig herds were identified and quantified.</p
    corecore