111 research outputs found

    Application of pectin-alginate and pectin-alginate-laurolyl arginate ethyl coatings to eliminate Salmonella enteritidis cross contamination in egg shells

    Get PDF
    This study highlights the potential application of pectin‐alginate blend (PA) and pectin‐alginate‐LAE blend (PAL) coatings to eliminate Salmonella enteriditis 10,118 cross‐contamination without changing the shelf‐life of fresh eggs and their physico‐chemical properties during storage at 7 °C for 42 days. Egg shells were dipped in a solution of Salmonella enteritidis 10,118 with a concentration of 7 x 106 cfu/ml to assess Salmonella cross‐contamination. PA and PAL coatings did not have a significant effect on shelf‐life based on physico‐chemical properties. The egg shells treated with PA and PAL coatings had a significantly lower microbial population compared to the uncoated egg shells. PA and PAL coatings effectively inhibited the growth of Salmonella after 1 and 7 days of storage, respectively. In addition, no outgrowth was observed up to 42 days

    Physical and Antimicrobial Properties of Compression-Molded Cassava Starch-Chitosan Films for Meat Preservation

    Full text link
    [EN] Cassava starch-chitosan films were obtained by melt bending and compression molding, using glycerol and polyethylene glycol as plasticizers. Both the starch/chitosan and the polymer/plasticizer ratios were varied in order to analyze their effect on the physical properties of the films. Additionally, the antimicrobial activity of 70:30 polymer:plasticizer films was tested in cold-stored pork meat slices as affected by chitosan content. All film components were thermally stable up to 200 A degrees C, which guaranteed their thermostability during film processing. Starch and chitosan had limited miscibility by melt blending, which resulted in heterogeneous film microstructure. Polyethylene glycol partially crystallized in the films, to a greater extent as the chitosan ratio increased, which limited its plasticizing effect. The films with the highest plasticizer ratio were more permeable to water vapor, less rigid, and less resistant to break. The variation in the chitosan content did not have a significant effect on water vapor permeability. As the chitosan proportion increased, the films became less stretchable, more rigid, and more resistant to break, with a more saturated yellowish color. The incorporation of the highest amount of chitosan in the films led to the reduction in coliforms and total aerobic counts of cold-stored pork meat slices, thus extending their shelf-life.The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competividad (Projects AGL2013-42989-R and AGL2016-76699-R). Author Cristina Valencia-Sullca thanks the Peruvian Grant National Program (PRONABEC Grant).Valencia-Sullca, CE.; AtarĂ©s Huerta, LM.; Vargas, M.; Chiralt, A. (2018). Physical and Antimicrobial Properties of Compression-Molded Cassava Starch-Chitosan Films for Meat Preservation. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 11(7):1339-1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-018-2094-5S13391349117Alves, V. D., Mali, S., Beleia, A., & Grossmann, M. V. (2007). Effect of glycerol and amylose enrichment on cassava starch film properties. Journal of Food Engineering, 78(3), 941–946.ASTM (1995). Standard test methods for water vapour transmission of materials. In: Standards designations: E96-95. Annual book of ASTM standards (pp. 406-413). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.ASTM (1999). Standard test method for specular gloss. In: Designation (D523). Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 06.01. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.ASTM (2001). Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. In: Standard D882 annual book of American standard testing methods. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.AtarĂ©s, L., Bonilla, J., & Chiralt, A. (2010). Characterization of sodium caseinate-based edible films incorporated with cinnamon or ginger essential oils. Journal of Food Engineering, 100(4), 678–687.Bonilla, J., AtarĂ©s, L., Vargas, M., & Chiralt, A. (2013). Properties of wheat starch film-forming dispersions and films as affected by chitosan addition. Journal of Food Engineering, 114(3), 303–312.Bonilla, J., Fortunati, E., AtarĂ©s, L., Chiralt, A., & Kenny, J. (2014). Physical, structural and antimicrobial properties of poly vinyl alcohol-chitosan biodegradable films. Food Hydrocolloids, 35, 463–470.Bourtoom, T., & Chinnan, M. S. (2008). Preparation and properties of rice starch–chitosan blend biodegradable film. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 41(9), 1633–1641.Cano, A., JimĂ©nez, A., ChĂĄfer, M., GonzĂĄlez-MartĂ­nez, C., & Chiralt, A. (2014). Effect of amylose: amylopectin ratio and rice bran addition on starch films properties. Carbohydrate Polymers, 111(0), 543–555.Carvalho, A. J. F. (2008). Starch: Major sources, properties and applications as thermoplastic materials. In M. N. Belgacem & A. Gandini (Eds.), Monomers, polymers and composites from renewable resources. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Chillo, S., Flores, S., Mastromatteo, M., Conte, A., Gerschenson, L., & Del Nobile, M. A. (2008). Influence of glycerol and chitosan on tapioca starch-based edible film properties. Journal of Food Engineering, 88(2), 159–168.Commission Regulation, 2005 (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. In Official Journal of the European Union pp 338/1–338/26.Da RĂłz, A., Carvalho, A., Gandini, A., & Curvelo, A. (2006). The effect of plasticizers on thermoplastic starch compositions obtained by melt processing. Carbohydrate Polymers, 63(3), 417–424.Dang, K., & Yoksan, R. (2015). Development of thermoplastic starch blown film by incorporating plasticized chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers, 115, 575–581.Dou, B., Dupont, V., Williams, P. T., Chen, H., & Ding, Y. (2009). Thermogravimetric kinetics of crude glycerol. Bioresource Technology, 100(9), 2613–2620.Fang, J., Fawler, P., Eserig, C., GonzĂĄlez, R., Costa, J., & Chamudis, L. (2005). Development of biodegradable laminate films derived from naturally occurring carbohydrate polymers. Carbohydrate Polymers, 60(1), 39–42.Hutchings, J. B. (1999). Food color and appearance (2nd ed.). Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA: Aspen Publishers, Inc..JimĂ©nez, A., Fabra, M. J., Talens, P., & Chiralt, A. (2012a). Edible and biodegradable starch films: A review. Food Bioprocessing Technology, 5(6), 2058–2076.JimĂ©nez, A., Fabra, M. J., Talens, P., & Chiralt, A. (2012b). Effect of re-crystallization on tensile, optical and water vapour barrier properties of corn starch films containing fatty acids. Food Hydrocolloids, 26(1), 302–310.LĂłpez, O., Garcia, A., Villar, M., Gentili, A., Rodriguez, M., & Albertengo, L. (2014). Thermo-compression of biodegradable thermoplastic corn starch films containing chitin and chitosan. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 57(106), 106–1515.Mali, S., Grossmann, M. V. E., GarcĂ­a, M. A., Martino, M. N., & Zaritsky, N. E. (2006). Effects of controlled storage on thermal, mechanical and barrier properties of plasticized films from different starch sources. Journal of Food Engineering, 75(4), 453–460.Mendes, J. F., Paschoalin, R. T., Carmona, V. B., Sena Neto, A. R. A., Marques, C. P., Marconcini, J. M., Mattoso, L. H. C., Medeiros, E. S., & Oliveira, J. E. (2016). Biodegradable polymer blends based on corn starch and thermoplastic chitosan processed by extrusion. Carbohydrate Polymers, 137, 452–458.Ortega-Toro, R., JimĂ©nez, A., Talens, P., & Chiralt, A. (2014). Properties of starch–hydroxypropyl methylcellulose based films obtained by compression molding. Carbohydrate Polymers, 109, 155–165.Ortega-Toro, R., Morey, I., Talens, P., & Chiralt, A. (2015). Active bilayer films of thermoplastic starch and polycaprolactone obtained by compression molding. Carbohydrate Polymers, 127, 282–290.Pelissari, F., Grossmann, M., Yamashita, F., & Pineda, E. (2009). Antimicrobial, mechanical and barrier properties of cassava starch-chitosan films incorporated with oregano essential oil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57(16), 7499–7504.Pelissari, F. M., Yamashita, F., GarcĂ­a, M. A., Martino, M. N., Zaritzky, N. E., & Grossmann, M. V. E. (2012). Constrained mixture design applied to the development of cassava starch-chitosan blown films. Journal of Food Engineering, 108(2), 262–267.Song, R., Xue, R., He, L. H., Liu, Y., & Xiao, Q. L. (2008). The structure and properties of chitosan/polyethylene glycol/silica ternary hybrid organic-inorganic films. Chinese Journal of Polymer Science, 26(05), 621–630.v.Su, J. F., Huang, Z., Yuan, X. Y., Wang, X. Y., & Lim, M. (2010). Structure and properties of carboxymethyl cellulose/soy protein isolate blend edible films crosslinked by Maillard reactions. Carbohydrate Polymers, 79(1), 145–153.Thunwall, M., Boldizar, A., & Rigdahl, M. (2006). Compression molding and tensile properties of thermoplastic potato starch materials. Biomacromolecules, 7(3), 981–986.TomĂ©, L., Fernandes, S., Sadocco, P., Causio, J., Silvertre, A., Neto, P., & Freire, C. (2012). Antibacterial thermoplastic starch- chitosan based materials prepared by melt-mixing. BioResources, 7(3), 3398–3409.Villalobos, R., Chanona, J., HernĂĄndez, P., GutiĂ©rrez, G., & Chiralt, A. (2005). Gloss and transparency of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films containing surfactants as affected by their microstructure. Food Hydrocolloids, 19(1), 53–61.Xu, Y. X., Kim, K. M., Hanna, M. A., & Nag, D. (2005). Chitosan–starch composite film: Preparation and characterization. Industrial Crops and Products, 21(2), 185–192.Yang, L., & Paulson, A. T. (2000). Mechanical and water vapour barrier properties of edible gellan. Food Research International, 33(7), 563–570

    The effect of polymer/plasticiser ratio in film forming solutions on the properties of chitosan films

    Get PDF
    In this work physical-chemical properties of chitosan/ glycerol film forming solutions (FFS) and the resulting films were analysed. Solutions were prepared using different concentrations of plasticising agent (glycerol) and chitosan. Films were produced by solvent casting and equilibrated in a controlled atmosphere. FFS water activity and rheological behaviour were determined. Films water content, solubility, water vapour and oxygen permeabilities, thickness, and mechanical and thermal properties were determined. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was also used to study the chitosan/glycerol interactions. Results demonstrate that FFS chitosan concentration influenced solutions consistency coefficient and this was related with differences in films water retention and structure. Plasticiser addition led to an increase in films moisture content, solubility and water vapour permeability, water affinity and structural changes. Films thermo-mechanical properties are significantly affected by both chitosan and glycerol addition. FTIR experiments confirm these results. This work highlights the importance of glycerol and water plasticisation in films properties.This work was supported by National Funds from FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, through project PEst-OE/EQB/LA0016/2011.Authors Joana F. Fundo, Andrea C. Galvis-Sanchez and Mafalda A. C. Quintas acknowledge FCT for research grants SFRH/ BD / 62176 / 2009, SFRH/BPD/37890/2007 and SFRH / BPD / 41715 / 2007, respectively

    The use of electric fields for edible coatings and films development and production: A review

    Get PDF
    Edible films and coatings can provide additional protection for food, while being a fully biodegradable, environmentally friendly packaging system. A diversity of raw materials used to produce edible coatings and films are extracted from marine and agricultural sources, including animals and plants. Electric fields processing holds advantage in producing safe, wholesome and nutritious food. Recently, the presence of a moderate electric field during the preparation of edible coatings and films was shown to influence their main properties, demonstrating its usefulness to tailor edible films and coatings for specific applications. This manuscript reviews the main aspects of the use of electric fields in the production of edible films and coatings, including the effect in their transport and mechanical properties, solubility and microstructure.Fundação para a CiĂȘncia e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de NĂ­vel Superior (CAPES), Brasil

    Perspectives on utilization of edible coatings and nano-laminate coatings for extension of postharvest storage of fruits and vegetables

    Get PDF
    It is known that in developing countries, a large quantity of fruit and vegetable losses results at postharvest and processing stages due to poor or scarce storage technology and mishandling during harvest. The use of new and innovative technologies for reducing postharvest losses is a requirement that has not been fully covered. The use of edible coatings (mainly based on biopolymers) as a postharvest technique for agricultural commodities has offered biodegradable alternatives in order to solve problems (e.g., microbiological growth) during produce storage. However, biopolymer-based coatings can present some disadvantages such as: poor mechanical properties (e.g., lipids) or poor water vapor barrier properties (e.g., polysaccharides), thus requiring the development of new alternatives to solve these drawbacks. Recently, nanotechnology has emerged as a promising tool in the food processing industry, providing new insights about postharvest technologies on produce storage. Nanotechnological approaches can contribute through the design of functional packing materials with lower amounts of bioactive ingredients, better gas and mechanical properties and with reduced impact on the sensorial qualities of the fruits and vegetables. This work reviews some of the main factors involved in postharvest losses and new technologies for extension of postharvest storage of fruits and vegetables, focused on perspective uses of edible coatings and nano-laminate coatings.MarĂ­a L. Flores-LĂłpez thanks Mexican Science and Technology Council (CONACYT, Mexico) for PhD fellowship support (CONACYT Grant Number: 215499/310847). Miguel A. Cerqueira (SFRH/BPD/72753/2010) is recipient of a fellowship from the Fundação para a CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia (FCT, POPH-QREN and FSE Portugal). The authors also thank the FCT Strategic Project of UID/ BIO/04469/2013 unit, the project RECI/BBB-EBI/0179/2012 (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027462) and the project ‘‘BioInd Biotechnology and Bioengineering for improved Industrial and AgroFood processes,’’ REF. NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000028 Co-funded by the Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (ON.2 – O Novo Norte), QREN, FEDER. Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento CientĂ­ïŹco e TecnolĂłgico – FUNCAP, CE Brazil (CI10080-00055.01.00/13)
    • 

    corecore