Association between vaccine adjuvant effect and pre-seasonal immunity. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised immunogenicity trials comparing squalene-adjuvanted and aqueous inactivated influenza vaccines

The immunogenicity benefit of inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) adjuvanted by squalene over non-adjuvanted aqueous IIV was explored in a meta-analysis involving 49 randomised trials published between 1999 and 2017, and 22,470 eligible persons of all age classes. Most vaccines contained 15 μg viral haemagglutinin per strain. Adjuvanted IIV mostly contained 9.75 mg squalene per dose. Homologous pre- and post-vaccination geometric mean titres (GMTs) of haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody were recorded for 290 single influenza (sub-)type arms. The adjuvant effect was expressed as the ratio of post-vaccination GMTs between squalene-IIV and aqueous IIV (GMTR, 145 estimates). GMTRs > 1.0 favoured squalene-IIV over aqueous IIV. For all influenza (sub-)types, the adjuvant effect proved negatively associated with pre-vaccination GMT and mean age. The adjuvant effect appeared most pronounced in young children (mean age < 2.5 years) showing an average GMTR of 3.7 (95% CI: 2.5 to 5.5). With increasing age, GMTR values gradually decreased towards 1.4 (95% CI: 1.0 to 1.9) in older adults. Heterologous antibody titrations simulating mismatch between vaccine and circulating virus (30 GMTR estimates) again showed a larger adjuvant effect at young age. GMT values and their variances were converted to antibody-predicted protection rates using an evidence-based clinical protection curve. The adjuvant effect was expressed as the protection rate differences, which showed similar age patterns as corresponding GMTR values. However for influenza B, the adjuvant effect lasted longer than for influenza A, possibly due to a generally later influenza B virus exposure. Collectively, this meta-analysis indicates the highest benefit of squalene-IIV over aqueous IIV in young children and decreasing benefit with progressing age. This trend is similar for seasonal influenza (sub-)types and the 2009 pandemic strain, by both homologous and heterologous titration. The impact of pre-seasonal immunity on vaccine effectiveness, and its implications for age-specific vaccination recommendations, are discussed

Clinical relevance of increased antibody titres in older adults upon vaccination with squalene-adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted influenza vaccines

In older adults, the serum antibody response to inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is often lower than in adolescents and non-elderly adults which may translate into suboptimal protection against influenza. To counteract this expression of immunosenescence, the use of adjuvanted IIV formulations has been explored. Four recent studies (three meta-analyses and one clinical trial) found an antibody increase of up to 1.5-fold in older adults, when a squalene-adjuvanted (MF59™) IIV was used. The clinical relevance of this increase may well continue to be a matter of debate. We would favour a threshold of 1.5 to consider an adjuvanted vaccine formulation superior to standard aqueous IIV because it exceeds the inevitable variation of antibody responses to non-adjuvanted IIV. It is also the same as the upper FDA equivalence limit for IIV lot-to-lot consistency. A corresponding threshold for the seroresponse rate difference could then be +5%