Lack of phenotypic and evolutionary cross-resistance against parasitoids and pathogens in Drosophila melanogaster

BackgroundWhen organisms are attacked by multiple natural enemies, the evolution of a resistance mechanism to one natural enemy will be influenced by the degree of cross-resistance to another natural enemy. Cross-resistance can be positive, when a resistance mechanism against one natural enemy also offers resistance to another; or negative, in the form of a trade-off, when an increase in resistance against one natural enemy results in a decrease in resistance against another. Using Drosophila melanogaster, an important model system for the evolution of invertebrate immunity, we test for the existence of cross-resistance against parasites and pathogens, at both a phenotypic and evolutionary level.MethodsWe used a field strain of D. melanogaster to test whether surviving parasitism by the parasitoid Asobara tabida has an effect on the resistance against Beauveria bassiana, an entomopathogenic fungus; and whether infection with the microsporidian Tubulinosema kingi has an effect on the resistance against A. tabida. We used lines selected for increased resistance to A. tabida to test whether increased parasitoid resistance has an effect on resistance against B. bassiana and T. kingi. We used lines selected for increased tolerance against B. bassiana to test whether increased fungal resistance has an effect on resistance against A. tabida.Results/ConclusionsWe found no positive cross-resistance or trade-offs in the resistance to parasites and pathogens. This is an important finding, given the use of D. melanogaster as a model system for the evolution of invertebrate immunity. The lack of any cross-resistance to parasites and pathogens, at both the phenotypic and the evolutionary level, suggests that evolution of resistance against one class of natural enemies is largely independent of evolution of resistance against the other

[Selective activation of blood pressure monitoring alarms: effect of noise pollution in the intensive care unit]

International audienceOBJECTIVE: To evaluate a selective activation of sounding alarms on non-invasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring according to the patient haemodynamic status. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Activation of alarms on BP was regulated with a protocol. Sounding alarms were either inactivated when patient's haemodynamic status was stable (group 1), or activated when it was unstable (group 2). The frequency of BP measurement was one every 15 min. For all mean BP value recorded, the following criteria were analyzed: 1) normality of the value compared to ranges 65-115 mmHg in group 1 or compared to alarm thresholds in group 2; 2) consequences on the care and therapeutic; 3) delay when an abnormal value was detected and managed after more than 15 min. RESULTS: 1,674 hours of monitoring from 42 patients, allowed the analysis of 6,695 measurements of mean BP, 3,092 in group 1 and 3,603 in group 2. In group 1, 2,822 measurements were considered as normal and 3,094 measures in group 2. Eight measurements had consequences on therapeutic in group 1, with only one with delay in care giving. 287 measurements had consequences on therapeutic in group 2, 8 with delay in care giving. Six per cent of abnormal measurements in group 2 were managed with delay. This protocol reduced by 52% the production of sounding alarms on BP, without noxious effects for the patients. CONCLUSION: Selective activation of sounding alarms on BP, according to the patient haemodynamic status, reduced noise pollution and could be one solution to improve monitoring efficiency in intensive care unit