3 research outputs found

    In vitro determination of the protein quality of maize varieties cultivated in Malawi using the INFOGEST digestion method

    Get PDF
    There is an urgent need to alleviate protein deficiencies in low-income countries where cereal-based diets dominate. The objective of this study was to use the INFOGEST static digestion method and a recently established analytical workflow to determine the in vitro amino acid digestibility and protein quality of seven maize varieties grown in Malawi. Protein quality was measured using the in vitro digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS). Amino acid digestibility was higher for the dehulled, low fibre, provitamin A maize flour (66%), compared to whole grain maize flours (51 – 61%), suggesting that the presence of fibre reduced digestibility (p < 0.05). Lysine was the limiting amino acid in all varieties, with the following DIAAS values for each variety; Provitamin A maize – 24, SC 719 – 32, Mtsikinya – 37, SC 167 – 39, Quality protein maize (QPM) – 40, Bantum – 40, SC 403 – 44. In addition to the variety of maize, protein quality was dependent on the level of processing and the agronomic practice applied with higher protein quality for the SC 403 variety in which zinc enriched fertiliser was applied. Comparing protein quality data with published in vivo data showed that DIAAS data were in closer agreement than amino acid digestibility data, which was slightly lower than published values, with mean in vitro amino acid digestibilities of 56 - 70% compared to a mean in vivo value of 77%. Overall, the in vitro method was able to correctly predict both the direction and magnitude of response. The INFOGEST digestion method coupled with the new analytical workflow will therefore be useful in the screening of high protein cereal crops and subsequent development of cereal-based foods with high protein quality

    Assessing the residual benefit of soil-applied zinc on grain zinc nutritional quality of maize grown under contrasting soil types in Malawi.

    Get PDF
    A proper understanding of the residual value of zinc (Zn) is necessary for sustainable biofortification of food crops. This study aimed to establish the extent to which application of Zn at the national rate, plus two experimentally elevated rates, in one year provided any benefit to plant yield and nutritional quality in the following growing season. Residual effects of soil-applied Zn on grain Zn concentration and uptake were estimated by an experiment in which maize was grown in successive seasons at two agricultural research stations in Malawi, with Zn applied to the soil in the first season but not the second. At each site two common soil types were used: Lixisols and Vertisols. The study used three Zn fertilizer rates of 1, 30 and 90 kg Zn ha -1 applied to the soil in the previous cropping season, arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 10 replications at each experimental site. At harvest, maize grain yield and Zn concentration in grain and stover were measured; Zn uptake by maize grain and stover were determined and Zn harvest index was calculated. Effects on grain yield and Zn uptake by the crop were assessed in relation to residual Zn fertilizer and soil type. Maize grain yield on plots in the second season where 30 kg Zn ha -1 had been applied exceeded that on second season plots where 1 kg Zn ha -1 had been applied by 25%. The grain Zn concentration and Zn uptake in the second season after fertilizer application were larger by 13% and 30% respectively on the plots which had received 30 kg Zn ha -1 than those which had received 1 kg Zn ha -1 . There was no evidence that applying Zn at 90 kg Zn ha -1 resulted in larger crop yield, grain Zn concentration, or Zn uptake the second year after application than was seen in plots the second year after application of 30 kg Zn ha -1 . The magnitude of the benefits attributed to residual effects of soil-applied Zn did not depend on soil type. Conclusively, the residual effects of 30 kg ha -1 of soil-applied Zn in the preceding season benefited the subsequent maize compared to the national recommendation of 1 kg Zn ha -1 . The benefits of larger applications of Zn than the current national recommendations should be considered across at least two seasons and for different crops

    Increasing zinc concentration in maize grown under contrasting soil types in Malawi through agronomic biofortification: trial protocol for a field experiment to detect small effect sizes

    Get PDF
    The prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies including zinc (Zn) is widespread in Malawi, especially among poor and marginalized rural populations. This is due to low concentrations of Zn in most staple cereal crops and limited consumption of animal source foods. The Zn concentration of cereal grain can be increased through application of Zn‐enriched fertilizers; a process termed agronomic biofortification or agro‐fortification. This trial protocol describes a field experiment which aims to assess the potential of agronomic biofortification to improve the grain Zn concentration of maize, the predominant staple crop of Malawi. The hypotheses of the study are that application of Zn‐enriched fertilizers will create a relatively small increase in the concentration of Zn in maize grains that will be sufficient to benefit dietary supplies of Zn, and that the effectiveness of agronomic biofortification will differ between soil types. The study will be conducted at three sites, Chitedze, Chitala, and Ngabu Agricultural Research Stations, in Lilongwe, Salima, and Chikwawa Districts respectively. These three sites represent locations in the Central and Southern Regions of Malawi. At each site, two different sub‐sites will be used, each corresponding to one of two agriculturally important soil types of Malawi, Lixisols, and Vertisols. Within each sub‐site, three Zn fertilizer rates (1, 30, and 90 kg/ha) will be applied to experimental plots using standard soil application methods, in a randomized complete block design. The number of replicates at plot level has been informed by a power analysis from pilot study data, assuming that a minimum 10% increase in Zn concentration of grain at 90 kg/ha relative to the concentration at 1 kg/ha is of interest. Grain mass (yield), stover mass, and both stover and grain Zn concentrations will be measured at harvest. A second year of cropping will be used to establish whether there are any residual benefits to grain Zn concentration. The potential for Zn agronomic biofortification will be communicated to relevant academic and government stakeholders through a peer review journal article and a briefing paper
    corecore