Exercise capacity in children after total cavopulmonary connection: lateral tunnel versus extracardiac conduit technique

In patients with univentricular heart disease, the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) is the preferred treatment. TCPC can be performed using the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) or extracardiac conduit (ECC) technique. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate exercise capacity in contemporary TCPC patients and compare the results between the 2 techniques. A total of 101 TCPC patients (ILT, n=42; ECC, n=59; age, 12.2±2.6 years; age at TCPC completion, 3.2±1.1 years) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The patients were recruited prospectively from 5 tertiary referral centers. For the entire group, the mean peak oxygen uptake was 74%±14%, peak heart rate was 90%±8%, peak workload was 62%±13%, and slope of ventilation versus carbon dioxide elimination (VE/VCO2 slope) was 127%±30% of the predicted value. For the ILT and ECC groups, patient age, age at TCPC completion, body surface area, peak workload, and peak heart rate were comparable. The percentage of predicted peak oxygen uptake was lower in the ILT group (70%±12% vs 77%±15%; P=.040), and the percentage of predicted VE/VCO2 slope was greater in the ILT group (123%±36% vs 108%±14%; P=.015). In a subgroup analysis that excluded ILT patients with baffle leak, these differences were not statistically significant. Common exercise parameters were impaired in contemporary Fontan patients. Chronotropic incompetence was uncommon. The peak oxygen uptake and VE/VCO2 slope were less favorable in ILT patients, likely related to baffle leaks in some ILT patients. These results have shown that a reduced exercise capacity in Fontan patients remains an important issue in contemporary cohorts. The ECC had a more favorable exercise outcome at medium-term follow-u

Comprehensive rhythm evaluation in a large contemporary Fontan population

Rhythm disturbances are an important cause of morbidity in Fontan patients. Currently, the total cavopulmonary connection is performed by using the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) ('baffle ILT' or 'prosthetic ILT'), or the extracardiac conduit (ECC). The aim of the study was to evaluate rhythm abnormalities and compare the surgical techniques in a contemporary cohort. In a cross-sectional multicentre study, 115 patients (age 12.5 ± 3.1 years) underwent rhythm evaluation using ECG, exercise testing and Holter, including heart rate variability. Medical history was reviewed for episodes of arrhythmia. Sinus node dysfunction (SND) was found in 29%, 3 of whom required pacemaker therapy. No difference was found in the incidence of SND between ILT and ECC patients. Sinus pauses occurred only in the ILT group. Exercise testing showed no difference in peak heart rate between the groups. Heart rate reserve (P = 0.023) and heart rate recovery (HRrecovery) (P < 0.001) were lower in ILT patients. Atrial arrhythmias were more common in ILT patients (15 vs 1%, P = 0.004), but only in those with a baffle ILT. One patient had symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Holter recordings showed sub-clinical VT in 6% of patients, which was associated with larger end-diastolic (P = 0.035) and end-systolic volumes (P = 0.029). The overall incidence of arrhythmia was low, although SND was frequently present in both Fontan groups. ILT patients had slower HRrecovery, and ILT patients with the more extensive baffle technique had more atrial arrhythmias and more sinus pauses. The significance of asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in this young population remains to be determine

Staged total cavopulmonary connection: serial comparison of intra-atrial lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit taking account of current surgical adaptations

OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to compare the outcome of the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) and the extracardiac conduit (ECC) techniques for staged total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) and to compare the current modifications of the TCPC technique, i.e. the prosthetic ILT technique with the current ECC technique with a ≥18-mm conduit. METHODS: We included patients who had undergone a staged TCPC between 1988 and 2008. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, operative details and events during follow-up (death, surgical and catheter-based reinterventions and arrhythmias). RESULTS: Of the 208 patients included, 103 had the ILT (51 baffle, 52 prosthetic) technique and 105 had the ECC technique. Median follow-up duration was 13.2 years (interquartile range 9.5-16.3). At 15 years after the TCPC, the overall survival rate was comparable (81% ILT vs 89% ECC; P = 0.12). Freedom from late surgical and catheter-based reintervention was higher for patients who had ILT than for those who had ECC (63% vs 44%; P = 0.016). However, freedom from late arrhythmia was lower for patients who had ILT than for those who had ECC (71% vs 85%, P = 0.034). In a subgroup of patients who had the current TCPC technique, when we compared the use of a prosthetic ILT with ≥18-mm ECC, we found no differences in freedom from late arrhythmias (82% vs 86%, P = 0.64) or in freedom from late reinterventions (70% vs 52%, P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: A comparison between the updated prosthetic ILT and current ≥18-mm ECC techniques revealed no differences in late arrhythmia-free survival or late reintervention-free survival. Overall, outcomes after the staged TCPC were relatively good and reinterventions occurred more frequently in the ECC group, whereas late arrhythmias were more common in the ILT group