General anaesthetic and airway management practice for obstetric surgery in England: a prospective, multicentre observational study

There are no current descriptions of general anaesthesia characteristics for obstetric surgery, despite recent changes to patient baseline characteristics and airway management guidelines. This analysis of data from the direct reporting of awareness in maternity patients’ (DREAMY) study of accidental awareness during obstetric anaesthesia aimed to describe practice for obstetric general anaesthesia in England and compare with earlier surveys and best-practice recommendations. Consenting patients who received general anaesthesia for obstetric surgery in 72 hospitals from May 2017 to August 2018 were included. Baseline characteristics, airway management, anaesthetic techniques and major complications were collected. Descriptive analysis, binary logistic regression modelling and comparisons with earlier data were conducted. Data were collected from 3117 procedures, including 2554 (81.9%) caesarean deliveries. Thiopental was the induction drug in 1649 (52.9%) patients, compared with propofol in 1419 (45.5%). Suxamethonium was the neuromuscular blocking drug for tracheal intubation in 2631 (86.1%), compared with rocuronium in 367 (11.8%). Difficult tracheal intubation was reported in 1 in 19 (95%CI 1 in 16–22) and failed intubation in 1 in 312 (95%CI 1 in 169–667). Obese patients were over-represented compared with national baselines and associated with difficult, but not failed intubation. There was more evidence of change in practice for induction drugs (increased use of propofol) than neuromuscular blocking drugs (suxamethonium remains the most popular). There was evidence of improvement in practice, with increased monitoring and reversal of neuromuscular blockade (although this remains suboptimal). Despite a high risk of difficult intubation in this population, videolaryngoscopy was rarely used (1.9%)

General anaesthetic and airway management practice for obstetric surgery in England: a prospective, multi-centre observational study

There are no current descriptions of general anaesthesia characteristics for obstetric surgery, despite recent changes to patient baseline characteristics and airway management guidelines. This analysis of data from the direct reporting of awareness in maternity patients' (DREAMY) study of accidental awareness during obstetric anaesthesia aimed to describe practice for obstetric general anaesthesia in England and compare with earlier surveys and best-practice recommendations. Consenting patients who received general anaesthesia for obstetric surgery in 72 hospitals from May 2017 to August 2018 were included. Baseline characteristics, airway management, anaesthetic techniques and major complications were collected. Descriptive analysis, binary logistic regression modelling and comparisons with earlier data were conducted. Data were collected from 3117 procedures, including 2554 (81.9%) caesarean deliveries. Thiopental was the induction drug in 1649 (52.9%) patients, compared with propofol in 1419 (45.5%). Suxamethonium was the neuromuscular blocking drug for tracheal intubation in 2631 (86.1%), compared with rocuronium in 367 (11.8%). Difficult tracheal intubation was reported in 1 in 19 (95%CI 1 in 16-22) and failed intubation in 1 in 312 (95%CI 1 in 169-667). Obese patients were over-represented compared with national baselines and associated with difficult, but not failed intubation. There was more evidence of change in practice for induction drugs (increased use of propofol) than neuromuscular blocking drugs (suxamethonium remains the most popular). There was evidence of improvement in practice, with increased monitoring and reversal of neuromuscular blockade (although this remains suboptimal). Despite a high risk of difficult intubation in this population, videolaryngoscopy was rarely used (1.9%)

Randomised trial of filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation versus autologous bone-marrow transplantation in lymphoma patients

Background A randomised trial comparing filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplants with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for haematopoietic stem cell support has not been done. We compared the effects of filgrastim-mobilised PBPC or autologous bone marrow reinfused to lymphoma patients after high-dose chemotherapy in a prospective randomised multicentre trial. Methods The trial was done at six centres in three European countries. After high-dose chemotherapy (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan [BEAM protocol]) 58 patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease or high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma received either filgrastim-mobilised PBPC (n=27) or bone marrow (n=31) for haemopoietic reconstitution. Findings The median number of days with platelet transfusions after grafting was 6 in the PBPC transplantation group and 10 in the ABMT group (estimate of treatment difference 5 days, 95% CI 3-7 days). Time to platelet recovery above 20x10(9)/L was 16 days in the PBPC transplantation group and 23 days in the ABMT group (p=0.02). Time to neutrophil recovery above 0.5x10(9)/L was also reduced in the PBPC transplantation group (11 vs 14 days, p=0.005). Patients randomised to PBPC transplantation needed fewer red blood cell transfusions (two vs three, p=0.002) and spent less time in hospital (17 vs 23 days, p=0.002). Early post-transplant morbidity and mortality as well as overall survival (median follow-up 311 days) were similar in both groups. There was no notable toxicity ascribed to filgrastim administration or the leucapheresis procedures. Interpretation In patients with lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy, reinfusing filgrastim-mobilised PBPC instead of autologous bone marrow significantly reduced the number of platelet transfusions, the time to platelet and neutrophil recovery, and led to earlier discharge from hospital

Survival and freedom from progression in autotransplant lymphoma patients is independent of stem cell source: Further follow-up from the original randomised study to assess engraftment

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have become the stem cell source of choice in autologous transplantation. In a prospective randomised trial, we previously demonstrated that autologous transplantation using filgrastim-mobilised PBPCs resulted in faster haematopoietic recovery with shorter hospitalisation and reduced platelet transfusions compared to bone marrow transplant (BMT). This study is a follow-up analysis evaluating the long-term clinical outcome. Seventy-two patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease or high-grade lymphoma were randomised to receive either filgrastim-mobilised PBPCs (n = 37) or bone marrow (n = 35) after BEAM chemotherapy. Fourteen patients withdrew from the study before commencing high-dose chemotherapy. Fourteen of the 58 patients who received treatment with chemotherapy and transplant have died, 6 (19%) in the ABMT arm and 8 (30%) in the PBPC transplant (PBPCT) arm. Twenty-five patients (81%) in the ABMT arm and 17 (63%) in the PBPCT arm, who received treatment, were in complete remission at the date of last follow-up. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were similar for both arms (OS 81% at 46 months for ABMT versus 63% for PBPC; p = 0.38). Further prospective studies with larger number of patients need to be done to assess which source of stem cells may translate into a long-term clinical benefit for the patient