Quality of life and functional status in patients with cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx: pretreatment values of a prospective study

We assessed the pretreatment health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional status of patients with advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Eighty patients were investigated. HRQOL was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. Functional status assessment comprised speech and oral function tests. The results revealed a wide range of HRQOL and functional deficits before treatment. HRQOL appeared to be related to some extent to tumor site (patients with oral tumors reported more pain compared to patients with oropharyngeal tumors) and tumor classification (patients with T3–T4 tumors reported more trouble opening the mouth and felt more ill compared to patients with T2 tumors). Comorbidity appeared to have a major impact. Patients with comorbidity had significantly worse scores on several scales/items on both the EORTC questionnaires. Functional deficits were related to tumor site, classification and comorbidity. Patients with oral cavity tumors (versus oropharyngeal tumors), patients with T3–T4 tumors (versus T2 tumors), and patients with comorbidity (versus without comorbidity) scored significantly worse on several speech and oral function tests. Impaired speech and oral function appeared to be clearly related to global quality of life (QLQ-C30) and self-reported speech (QLQ-H&N35). Many patients with advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer have compromised HRQOL and functional status before the start of treatment. In addition to tumor site and tumor classification, comorbidity appears to have a major impact on HRQOL and functional status. Knowledge of pretreatment HRQOL and functional status levels is useful for better understanding the impact of treatment on these outcomes over time

Efficacy of S53P4 Bioactive Glass for the Secondary Obliteration of Chronically Discharging Radical Cavities

Abstract Objective Present the results of the secondary obliteration of chronically discharging radical cavities using S53P4 bioactive glass (BAG). Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Single‐center study. Methods A single‐center retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients that underwent secondary obliteration of persistently draining radical cavities using S53P4 BAG between 2011 and 2022. Patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were excluded. The main outcome was postoperative otorrhea, as indicated by Merchant grading. Results In total, 97 patients were included. The median postoperative follow‐up time was 3.9 years (range 0.5‐10.4). Average time between the original canal wall down surgery and the secondary obliteration was 25.3 years (SD 11.7, range 2‐66). At the most recent follow‐up visit, a Merchant grade of 0 to 1 was observed in 95% of the cases. There were no cases of sensorineural hearing loss or facial palsy, one case developed a retro auricular skin defect and 1 patient developed CSF leakage. Minor complications were seen in 10 patients (10%). Ossicular chain reconstruction with a titanium prosthesis was performed in 42 cases, resulting in a median improvement of 11.2 dB in air conduction thresholds. In 9/42 cases (21%), closure of the postoperative air‐bone gap to ≤20 dB was achieved. Twenty‐five percent of cases could be discharged from out‐patient visits. Conclusion Revision of persistently draining radical cavities with BAG obliteration is feasible and results in a dry and safe ear in 95% of the patients, thereby enabling wearing of a conventional hearing aid. Out‐patient visits could be ceased in 25% of the cases

Cholesteatoma surgery in the pediatric population: remaining challenges in the era of mastoid obliteration

Purpose: To present the first pediatric study on the safety and efficacy of mastoid obliteration using S53P4 bioactive glass (BAG) for cholesteatoma surgery. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. Inclusion criteria were pediatric cases (≤ 18 years) and at least at least one year of follow-up including non-echo planar diffusion-weighted MRI to assess cholesteatoma recidivism. Both canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) procedures were evaluated. Results: A total of 61 cases (56 patients) were included. Most cases had an otologic history before the development of the cholesteatoma. CWU procedure was performed in 18 cases (30%) and CWD procedure in 43 cases (70%). The cholesteatoma recidivism rate was 33% after a mean follow-up period of 58 months. Kaplan–Meier curve estimated a 5-year recidivism rate of 40%. Few complications were seen that were all minor and resolved spontaneously or after local or systemic treatment. Control of the infection (merchant grade 0–1) was achieved in 98% of the cases. Closure of the air–bone gap within 20 dB was achieved in 22% of the cases with complete audiometric evaluation. Conclusion: In this MRI-controlled study, we show the safety and efficacy of S53P4 BAG for mastoid obliteration in a pediatric cholesteatoma cohort. Postoperative complications were both rare and minor, and a dry ear was achieved in almost all patients. Nevertheless, persistent hearing loss and the apparent high recidivism rate reflect the challenging nature of pediatric cholesteatoma

Mastoid Obliteration Using S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Cholesteatoma Surgery: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience in 173 Adult Patients with Long-Term Magnetic Resonance Imaging Controlled Follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To present the long-term outcomes of mastoid obliteration in cholesteatoma surgery using S53P4 bioactive glass (BAG) in an adult population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center study. PATIENTS: All 173 adult patients who underwent primary or revision surgery for cholesteatoma with mastoid obliteration using S53P4 BAG with at least 1 year of follow-up including nonecho planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (non-EP DWI MRI) and/or second-look surgery to evaluate recidivism. Both canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) procedures were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent CWU or CWD mastoidectomy using S53P4 BAG. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Cholesteatoma recidivism, postoperative complications, Merchant grade, hearing outcome. RESULTS: Cholesteatoma recidivism was assessed by MRI in 97% of all cases and second-look surgery look surgery in 3% of cases. After a mean follow-up period of 53 months, cholesteatoma recidivism was seen in 10% of the cases (n = 18). Using the Kaplan-Meier curve to extrapolate, a 5-year recidivism rate of 12% was estimated. Only minor complications occurred, all resolving spontaneously or after minor treatment. Merchant grade of 0 to 1 was achieved 95% of the patients, no persistently wet ears were observed. Closure of the air-bone gap within 20 dB was possible in 32%. CONCLUSION: In this long-term (up to 10 yr) follow-up study, we demonstrated the safety of S53P4 BAG. Minimal and only minor postoperative complications were observed. The effectiveness of BAG was indicated by the low rate of recidivism, even when using non-EP DWI MRI, a sensitive and specific noninvasive technique to detect cholesteatoma recidivism

Efficacy of S53P4 Bioactive Glass for the Secondary Obliteration of Chronically Discharging Radical Cavities

Publication status: PublishedAbstractObjectivePresent the results of the secondary obliteration of chronically discharging radical cavities using S53P4 bioactive glass (BAG).Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingSingle‐center study.MethodsA single‐center retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients that underwent secondary obliteration of persistently draining radical cavities using S53P4 BAG between 2011 and 2022. Patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were excluded. The main outcome was postoperative otorrhea, as indicated by Merchant grading.ResultsIn total, 97 patients were included. The median postoperative follow‐up time was 3.9 years (range 0.5‐10.4). Average time between the original canal wall down surgery and the secondary obliteration was 25.3 years (SD 11.7, range 2‐66). At the most recent follow‐up visit, a Merchant grade of 0 to 1 was observed in 95% of the cases. There were no cases of sensorineural hearing loss or facial palsy, one case developed a retro auricular skin defect and 1 patient developed CSF leakage. Minor complications were seen in 10 patients (10%). Ossicular chain reconstruction with a titanium prosthesis was performed in 42 cases, resulting in a median improvement of 11.2 dB in air conduction thresholds. In 9/42 cases (21%), closure of the postoperative air‐bone gap to ≤20 dB was achieved. Twenty‐five percent of cases could be discharged from out‐patient visits.ConclusionRevision of persistently draining radical cavities with BAG obliteration is feasible and results in a dry and safe ear in 95% of the patients, thereby enabling wearing of a conventional hearing aid. Out‐patient visits could be ceased in 25% of the cases.</jats:sec

Swallowing after major surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of patients treated by microvascular soft tissue reconstruction

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze swallowing outcome in advanced oral/oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with microvascular reconstructive surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS: Eighty patients were included. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were assessed. Postoperative videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) and scintigraphy tests were performed at 6 (n = 54 vs 44) and 12 (n = 32 vs 37) months. Swallowing parameters such as the oropharyngeal swallow efficiency and the Penetration/Aspiration Scale were analyzed. RESULTS: Impaired swallowing status was found at 6 months, which remained stationary at 12 months. Comorbid condition, larger tumors (T3-T4 vs T2), and resections of the base of tongue and soft palate combined (vs defects of other dynamic structures) were associated with most profound swallowing problems (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Swallowing difficulties are relatively frequent and can to a large extent be predicted. With the knowledge of this study, better counseling and vigilance as to swallowing difficulties may be possible