32 research outputs found

    Bone regeneration with umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells in femoral defects of ovariectomized rats

    No full text
    Objectives: Current treatments for osteoporosis were prevention of progression, yet it has been questionable in the stimulation of bone growth. The mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) treatment for osteoporosis aims to induce differentiation of bone progenitor cells into bone-forming osteoblasts. We investigate whether human umbilical cord blood (hUCB)-MSCs transplantation may induce bone regeneration for osteoporotic rat model induced by ovariectomy. Methods: The ovariectomized (OVX) group (n = 10) and OVX-MSCs group (n = 10) underwent bilateral ovariectomy to induce osteoporosis, while the Sham group (n = 10) underwent sham operation at aged 12 weeks. After a femoral defect was made at 9 months, Sham group and OVX group were injected with Hartmann solution, while the OVX-MSCs group was injected with Hartmann solution containing 1 × 107 hUCB-MSCs. The volume of regenerated bone was evaluated using micro-computed tomography at 4 and 8 weeks postoperation. Results: At 4- and 8-week postoperation, the OVX group (5.0% ± 1.5%; 6.1% ± 0.7%) had a significantly lower regenerated bone volume than the Sham group (8.6% ± 1.3%; 12.0% ± 1.8%, P < 0.01), respectively. However, there was no significant difference between the OVX-MSCs and Sham groups. The OVX-MSCs group resulted in about 53% and 65% significantly higher new bone formation than the OVX group (7.7% ± 1.9%; 10.0% ± 2.9%, P < 0.05). Conclusions: hUCB-MSCs in bone defects may enhance bone regeneration in osteoporotic rat model similar to nonosteoporotic bone regeneration. hUCB-MSCs may be a promising alternative stem cell therapy for osteoporosis. Keywords: Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, Osteoporosi

    The Effect of Intravenous Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine on Analgesia Duration of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized, Four-Arm, Triple-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

    No full text
    Intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine, in conjunction with peripheral nerve blockade, have each been reported to prolong the duration of analgesia. This study tested whether combined use further prolongs analgesia duration after supraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) in patients undergoing orthopedic upper extremity surgery. One hundred twenty patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to Control (saline bolus and midazolam infusion [0.05 mg/kg loading, 20 &micro;g/kg/h thereafter]); DMED (saline bolus and dexmedetomidine infusion [1 &mu;g/kg loading, 0.4 &mu;g/kg/h thereafter]); DEXA (dexamethasone [10 mg] bolus and midazolam infusion); and DMED-DEXA (dexmedetomidine infusion and dexamethasone bolus) groups. The primary outcome was the duration of postoperative analgesia, defined as the time from the end of the BPB to the first dose of analgesia via a patient-controlled device. Median (interquartile range) times to first dose of analgesia in the Control, DMED, DEXA, and DMED-DEXA groups were 8.1 (6.2&ndash;11.6), 9.0 (8.1&ndash;11.3), 10.7 (8.1&ndash;20.5), and 13.2 (11.5&ndash;19.1) hours, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed significant prolongation of analgesia in the DEXA included groups compared with the non-DEXA included groups (DEXA vs. control, p = 0.045; DEXA vs. DMED, p = 0.045; DMED-DEXA vs. control, p &lt; 0.001; DMED-DEXA vs. DMED, p &lt; 0.001). A mixed effect model showed that dexamethasone was the only significant factor for the prolongation of analgesia (p &lt; 0.001). Intravenous dexamethasone prolonged the analgesia duration of supraclavicular BPB after orthopedic upper extremity surgery. The concurrent use of mild to moderate sedation dose of intravenous dexmedetomidine in addition to intravenous dexamethasone showed no additional benefit to the prolongation of analgesia

    Ultrasound-guided perioperative management of 28-month-old patient with congenital diaphragmatic eventration

    No full text
    Diaphragmatic eventration is a rare anomaly. When patients with this condition undergo general anesthesia, anesthetic management should be performed with particular care owing to the risk of diaphragmatic rupture. Such a rupture can be perioperatively diagnosed using multiple tools including lung ultrasonography. This case report describes the anesthetic management of a male infant with osteochondroma in the distal ulna, presenting with diaphragmatic eventration on the right side

    Optimal view detection for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block using deep learning approaches

    No full text
    Abstract Successful ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (SCB) requires the understanding of sonoanatomy and identification of the optimal view. Segmentation using a convolutional neural network (CNN) is limited in clearly determining the optimal view. The present study describes the development of a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system using a CNN that can determine the optimal view for complete SCB in real time. The aim of this study was the development of computer-aided diagnosis system that aid non-expert to determine the optimal view for complete supraclavicular block in real time. Ultrasound videos were retrospectively collected from 881 patients to develop the CADx system (600 to the training and validation set and 281 to the test set). The CADx system included classification and segmentation approaches, with Residual neural network (ResNet) and U-Net, respectively, applied as backbone networks. In the classification approach, an ablation study was performed to determine the optimal architecture and improve the performance of the model. In the segmentation approach, a cascade structure, in which U-Net is connected to ResNet, was implemented. The performance of the two approaches was evaluated based on a confusion matrix. Using the classification approach, ResNet34 and gated recurrent units with augmentation showed the highest performance, with average accuracy 0.901, precision 0.613, recall 0.757, f1-score 0.677 and AUROC 0.936. Using the segmentation approach, U-Net combined with ResNet34 and augmentation showed poorer performance than the classification approach. The CADx system described in this study showed high performance in determining the optimal view for SCB. This system could be expanded to include many anatomical regions and may have potential to aid clinicians in real-time settings. Trial registration The protocol was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (KCT0005822, https://cris.nih.go.kr )

    Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Sagittal Cervical Spine Alignment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

    No full text
    (1) Background: Although radiography performed on the subject in an upright position is considered the standard method for assessing sagittal cervical alignment, it is frequently determined, or reported, based on MRI performed on the subject in a supine position. (2) Methods: Cervical alignment observed in both imaging modalities was assessed using four methods: the C2-7 Cobb angle, the absolute rotation angle (ARA), Borden&rsquo;s method, and the sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Cervical alignment was determined (lordosis, kyphosis, and straight) based on radiography. Then, the diagnostic cut-off values for the MRI images and their corresponding diagnostic accuracies were assessed. (3) Results: The analysis included 142 outpatients. The determined diagnostic cut-off values for lordosis, using three measurements (Cobb angle, ARA, and Borden&rsquo;s method), were &minus;8.5&deg;, &minus;12.5&deg;, and 3.5 mm, respectively, and the cut-off values for kyphosis were &minus;4.5&deg;, 0.5&deg;, and &minus;1.5 mm, respectively. The cut-off value for SVA &gt; 40 mm was 19.5 mm. The Cobb angle, ARA, and Borden&rsquo;s method, on MRI, showed high negative predictive values for determining kyphosis. The SVA on MRI measurements also showed high negative predictive values for determining &gt;40 mm. (4) Conclusions: MRI measurements may be predictive of cervical alignment, especially for the exclusion of kyphosis and SVA &gt; 40 mm. However, caution is needed in the other determinations using MRI, as their accuracies are limited
    corecore