Diagnosis of thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor in cytology

INTRODUCTION: Although alterations in SMARCA4-deficient occur in non-small cell lung carcinoma (SD-NSCLC), thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (TSDUT) is recognized as a distinct entity in the 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Thoracic Tumors because of unique morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular features, and worse survival compared with SD-NSCLC. Cytologic diagnosis of TSDUT is clinically important because of its aggressive behavior and because it is often diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration because TSDUTs are usually unresectable at presentation. Here, we identify cytologic features that can be used for recognition of TSDUT and distinction from SD-NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cytomorphologic features were investigated in cytology specimens from patients with TSDUT (n = 11) and compared with a control group of patients with SD-NSCLC (n = 20). RESULTS: The presence of classic rhabdoid morphology, at least focally, was entirely specific for TSDUT (n = 6, 55%) compared with SD-NSCLC (n = 0) in this study. TSDUT more frequently showed tumor necrosis (n = 11, 100% vs. n = 8, 40%; p = .001), dominant single-cell pattern on aspirate smears or touch preparation slides (n = 8 [of 9], 80% vs. n = 3, 15%; p = .010), nuclear molding (n = 5, 45% vs. n = 1, 5%; p = .013), and indistinct cell borders (n = 11, 100% vs. n = 5, 25%; P \u3c .001) compared with SD-NSCLC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cytomorphologic features occurring more frequently in TSDUT include tumor necrosis, dominant single-cell pattern, nuclear molding indistinct cell borders, and focal rhabdoid cells. Presence of these features in a cytology specimen of an undifferentiated tumor, particularly in a patient with a thoracic mass, should raise suspicion for TSDUT and prompt appropriate ancillary workup

SCLC Subtypes Defined by ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1: A Comprehensive Immunohistochemical and Histopathologic Characterization

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have identified subtypes of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) defined by the RNA expression of ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1 transcriptional regulators. There are only limited data on the distribution of these markers at the protein level and associated pathologic characteristics in clinical SCLC samples. METHODS: The expression of ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 174 patient samples with SCLC. Subtypes defined by these markers were correlated with histologic characteristics, expression of classic neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CD56, INSM1), and other SCLC markers, including the neuroendocrine phenotype-associated markers TTF-1 and DLL3. RESULTS: ASCL1 and NEUROD1 expression had the following distribution: ASCL1+/NEUROD1- 41%, ASCL1+/NEUROD1+ 37%, ASCL1-/NEUROD1+ 8% and ASCL1-/NEUROD1- 14%. Based on the relative expression, 69% of cases were ASCL1-dominant and 17% NEUROD1-dominant. POU2F3 was expressed in 7% of SCLC, and was mutually exclusive of ASCL1 and NEUROD1. YAP1 was expressed at low levels, primarily in combined SCLC, and was not exclusive of other subtypes. Both ASCL1-dominant and NEUROD1-dominant subtypes were associated with neuroendocrine marker(high)/DLL3(high) profile, whereas POU2F3 and other ASCL1/NEUROD1-double-negative tumors were neuroendocrine marker(low)/DLL3(low). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive immunohistochemical and histopathologic analysis of novel SCLC subtypes in patient samples. We confirm that ASCL1/NEUROD1 double-negative tumors represent a distinct neuroendocrine-low subtype of SCLC, which is either uniquely associated with POU2F3 or lacks a known dominant regulator. The expression profiles of these markers appear more heterogeneous in native samples than in experimental models, particularly with regard to the high prevalence of ASCL1/NEUROD1 coexpression. These findings may have prognostic and therapeutic implications and warrant further clinical investigation