6 research outputs found
The effect of diet on the structure of gut bacterial community of sympatric pair of whitefishes (Coregonus lavaretus): one story more
In the Coregonus lavaretus complex may be found lacustrine sympatric pairs, which serves as an intriguing model for studying different aspects of fish evolutionary biology. One such sympatric whitefish pair inhabits Teletskoye Lake (West Siberia, Russia) and includes a βlargeβ form (Coregonus lavaretus pidschian (Gmelin, 1789)) and a βsmallβ form (C. l. pravdinellus (Dulkeit, 1949)). C. l. pravdinellus has a narrow trophic specialization and feeds on zooplankton, whereas the diet of C. l. pidschian is based on benthic prey. In the present study we aimed to address the question of how the gut microbial community reflects the divergence in diet of a sympatric pair of whitefish. Studied samples included the mucosa and content were collected for cardiac and pyloric stomach, anterior, middle, and posterior intestine, but only mucosa was collected for the pyloric caeca. In addition, water, sediment, macrophyte (environmental microbiota) and invertebrate (microbiota of prey) samples were collected in the same location. The V3βV4 region of the 16S rRNA genes was chosen for microbiome analysis and the software PICRUSt used to estimate the difference functional roles of the microbiota. The number of OTUs and Chao1 index in mucosa and content of cardiac and pyloric stomach were significantly different between whitefish. Significant differences were observed between whitefish for content from different parts of the intestine in terms of OTU number and Chao1 indices, whereas for mucosa from the same parts of intestine these differences were absent. No significant differences were found for diversity estimates of mucosa and content of different parts of the gut (there were a few exceptions) between whitefish. The form of whitefish and the segment of the digestive system were factors with a significant determinative effect on the structure of the microbiota from gut mucosa and content. The most dominant phyla in mucosa and content of cardiac and pyloric stomach was Proteobacteria (57.0β84.0%) for both whitefish. Throughout the intestine of C. l. pidschian the dominant phyla in mucosa were Proteobacteria (38.8%) and Firmicutes (15.6%), whereas for C. l. pravdinellusβTenericutes (49.6%) and Proteobacteria (28.1%). For both forms, the phylum Spirochaetes was found in a significant amount (20.0β25.0%) in the mucosa of the posterior intestine. While for the content obtained from anterior, middle and posterior intestines, the dominant bacterial phyla were the same as those described for mucosa from the same parts of the intestine for both whitefish. The bacterial community of the prey and environment was significantly different from bacterial communities found for all parts of the gut mucosa for both whitefish, with the exception of the mucosa of the cardiac stomach. According to PICRUSt the highest level of differences between whitefish at the L3 level were found for the intestinal mucosa (75.3%), whereas the lowest one was registered for stomach content (38.8%).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Intraspecific structure of the Coregonus lavaretus complex in water bodies of Siberia: a case of postglacial allopatric origin of Yukagirian whitefish
The results of morphological and genetic analyses of forms/species of the Coregonus lavaretus pidschian (Gmelin, 1789) complex from the Indigirka and Kolyma river basins are presented in the context of there being recent postglacial speciation events. It has been found that the studied whitefishes belong to the sparsely rakered and low lateral-line forms and have previously been described as Coregonus lavaretus pidschian n. jucagiricus Drjagin (Berg), 1932. Based on these characters, this whitefish does not differ from most Arctic whitefish populations (in particular from Coregonus lavaretus glacialis Kirillov, 1972). Analysis of variability of the ND1 gene (mtDNA) showed that whitefishes from the Indigirka and Kolyma basins belong to a distant phylogenetic lineage, which is significantly different from all previously studied whitefish lineages from the Ob, Yenisei, Lena, Anadyr, and Amur river basins. Analysis of variability of the ITS1 fragment (nDNA) showed that all studied forms/species (from Ob River to Amur River basins), including C. l. pidschian n. jucagiricus, have a tandem arrangement of two identical nucleotide fragments and very similar nucleotide composition of the ITS1 region. Based on contemporary data, this phylogenetic lineage of the C. pidschian complex could be considered a young postglacial allopatric species.info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersio
Unexpected endemism in the Daphnia longispina complex (Crustacea: Cladocera) in Southern Siberia.
The biological significance of regional cladoceran morphotypes in the montane regions of the central Palearctic remains poorly understood. In the Holarctic Daphnia longispina complex (Cladocera: Daphniidae), several variants, lineages and species have been proposed as endemic for Southern Siberia. Daphnia turbinata Sars, for example, named after its unusual head shape, is known only from Southern Siberia. Here we sequence DNA of Daphnia from three mitochondrial genes (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2, ND2) from 57 localities in Russia and Mongolia (the majority being from Southern Siberia) and place them in evolutionary context with existing data. Our aim was to examine regional endemism of the Daphnia longispina complex in Southern Siberian; to improve the phylogenetic understanding with improved taxonomic and regional sampling, and to better understand the influence of Pleistocene glaciation on the biogeography of these lineages. At least three lineages showed genetic evidence for endemism in Southern Siberia. There was strong support for D. turbinata as a sister lineage to to D. longispina/D. dentifera. Another endemic, Siberian D. cf. longispina, is a sister group to the longispina group in general. Within D. longispina s. str. there was an endemic Siberian clade with a western range boundary near the Yenisei River Basin. Gene flow estimates among populations (based on FST values) were very low for clades of D. longispina on a regional (the original 12S dataset), and on a pan-Eurasian (the extended 12S dataset) scale. Negative values of Fu's FS and Tajima's D tests prevailed for the species examined with significant values found for two D. longispina clades, D. dentifera, D. galeata and D. cristata. Our results support the notion that Southern Siberia is an important biogeographic region for cladocerans as it contained unexpected diversity of endemics (such as D. turbinata, D. cf. longispina and lineages of D. umbra and D. longsipina s.str.) and from being the geographic meeting place of expanding postglacial lineages from eastern and western refugia
Morphological Differentiation, Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Variability Between Geographically Distant Populations of Daphnia galeata and Daphnia cucullata (Anomopoda, Daphniidae)
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Ρ. Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
, ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΌΠ° Π·Π°ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 ΠΈ Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862
(Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΠ°Π»ΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΡΡ - ΠΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΠ²Π° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ,
ΠΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ) ΠΈ ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ, ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ).
ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ². Π‘Π°ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Ρ, ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ
Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ³Π»Ρ. Π Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π°
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ 16S ΠΈ 12S Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ITS2 ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ.
ΠΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ D. galeata ΠΈ D. cucullata Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ
Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ± ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ
Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅.Although members of genus Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) are the most common water
invertebrates and are considered as model organisms for many taxonomic, ecological and
evolutionary studies their systematics remains unresolved. Here, morphological differentiation
and genetic polymorphism between the geographically distant populations of the sister species
Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 and Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862 in the Curonian Lagoon, a large
shallow freshwater lagoon of the Baltic Sea (Russia, Kaliningrad Oblast) and Novosibirsk Reservoir
(Russia, Novosibirsk Oblast) are presented. The divergence between species and their populations
was analyzed based on traditional morphological traits and a large set of morphometric traits
describing the body shape. The traits describing the shape of head and helmet, and spine were the
most variable morphological characters. Phylogenetic relationships between species and populations
were constructed based on variation in mitochondrial 16S and 12S rRNA genes and nuclear ITS2
rDNA sequences. The mitochondrial DNA divergence between D. galeata and D. cucullata species
was significant and reflected their monophyletic origin, whereas intraspecific genetic distances are
estimated as insignificant
Contrasting phylogeographic patterns and demographic history in closely related species of Daphnia longispina group (Crustacea: Cladocera) with focus on North-Eastern Eurasia.
Species with large geographic distributions present a challenge for phylogeographic studies due to the logistic difficulties of obtaining adequate samples. Daphnia O.F. MΓΌller (Anomopoda: Daphniidae) is a model genus for evolutionary biology and ecology, but many regions such as the remote areas of Siberia, remain poorly studied. Here we examined genetic polymorphism in the ribosomal 12S and the protein-coding ND2 mitochondrial genes of three closely related taxa of the Daphnia (Daphnia) longispina complex, namely D. galeata Sars, D. longispina O.F. MΓΌller and D. dentifera Forbes. We estimated the phylogenetic relationships among these taxa based on a concatenated alignment of these two genes. Using sequences from the present study and those available in GenBank, we investigated the geographic distributions of the mitochondrial haplotypes of these species and proposed an evolutionary scenario for each taxon. Network structures, haplotype distribution patterns, and FST values indicated significant differences in the evolutionary history of the examined species. Our analysis of D. galeata populations confirmed its recent and fast expansion, without a previous phase of a strong population disconnection. In contrast, the high haplotype diversity in D. dentifera and D. longispina could be explained by the survival of different phylogroups in several glacial refugia located in different geographic regions. For all studied species, maximum haplotype diversity was recorded in the remote regions of Siberia-lakes of the Yenisei River and Transbaikalia. Our study is an important step in our understanding of the evolutionary history of the Daphnia longispina group and provides further evidence of the biogeographic significance of Siberia for freshwater taxa
Morphological Differentiation, Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Variability Between Geographically Distant Populations of Daphnia galeata and Daphnia cucullata (Anomopoda, Daphniidae)
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Ρ. Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
, ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΌΠ° Π·Π°ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 ΠΈ Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862
(Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΠ°Π»ΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΡΡ - ΠΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΠ²Π° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ,
ΠΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ) ΠΈ ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ, ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ).
ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ². Π‘Π°ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Ρ, ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ
Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ³Π»Ρ. Π Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π°
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ 16S ΠΈ 12S Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ITS2 ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ.
ΠΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ D. galeata ΠΈ D. cucullata Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ
Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ± ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ
Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅.Although members of genus Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) are the most common water
invertebrates and are considered as model organisms for many taxonomic, ecological and
evolutionary studies their systematics remains unresolved. Here, morphological differentiation
and genetic polymorphism between the geographically distant populations of the sister species
Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 and Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862 in the Curonian Lagoon, a large
shallow freshwater lagoon of the Baltic Sea (Russia, Kaliningrad Oblast) and Novosibirsk Reservoir
(Russia, Novosibirsk Oblast) are presented. The divergence between species and their populations
was analyzed based on traditional morphological traits and a large set of morphometric traits
describing the body shape. The traits describing the shape of head and helmet, and spine were the
most variable morphological characters. Phylogenetic relationships between species and populations
were constructed based on variation in mitochondrial 16S and 12S rRNA genes and nuclear ITS2
rDNA sequences. The mitochondrial DNA divergence between D. galeata and D. cucullata species
was significant and reflected their monophyletic origin, whereas intraspecific genetic distances are
estimated as insignificant