Introduction: Principles and Practices of EU External Representation.

With this working paper, CLEER aims to offer a better insight into selected legal aspects concerning the European Union’s redefined diplomatic persona. In particular, the working paper will address issues pertaining to the Lisbon Treaty’s organising principles of EU external action, both under EU law and international law, and the growing practice of external representation of the European Union, especially in the context of other international organisations and bodies. Many questions remain unanswered in this respect, for instance: how can we best understand the relationship between the way the EU decides upon international positions and organises its external representation on the one hand, and its influence, performance and/or effectiveness on the other hand? Does the European Union’s formal status as a subject of international law justify an upgraded observer status within international organisations, a seat additional to that of the EU Member States, or should the EU replace them? Does it matter who speaks for the EU, and in what way? How should we square the emergence of the European External Action Service (EEAS), a hybrid organ consisting of EU civil servants and seconded diplomats from the Member States, with the traditionally state-centred body of international diplomatic law? And what can be expected from the High Representative, the EEAS and its vast network of diplomatic representations in third countries and multilateral settings in the pursuit of the Treaty’s external objectives

La Formation de Jupille, nouvelle formation dans le Dévonien inférieur de la Haute-Ardenne (Belgique)

The Jupille Formation, new formation in the lower Devonian of the High-Ardenne (Belgium). A new formation named Jupille is proposed to better characterize in the High-Ardenne area the rocks interbedded between the La Roche (or Villé if La Roche is missing) and Pèrnelle Formations, at the transition between the Pragian/Emsian stages (Lower Devonian). This formation is made up of series of grey, blue grey or greenish grey sandstone layers interbedded in blue grey siltstones and slates similar to those of the La Roche Formation. Locally, the sandstones grades to quartzites. Tool marks, current ripples, lenticular and oblique or hummocky cross-stratifications and load casts (pseudonodules) are present in the sandstone layers

Microfaciès d’une lentille biohermale a la limite Eifelien/Givetien (‘Fondry Des Chiens’, Nismes, bord sud du synclinorium de Dinant)

Microfacies of a biohermal lens at the Eifelian.Givetian transition (‘Fondry des Chiens’, Nismes, southern border of the Dinant Synclinorium). The biohermal lens of the ‘Fondry des Chiens’ belongs to the Eifelian-Givetian transition beds near Nismes (southern flank of the Dinant basin). The lens is 64 m thick and composed of a stromatopore-coral framestone. It is overlain by restricted lagoonal algal and cyanophycean facies near the emersion, and overlies Udoteacean and coral-bryozoan coverstones forming the flanks of two other unexposed lenses. Two crinoidal soles stabilized by syntaxial cementation constitute the substratum of these lenses. The reefal sedimentation is regressive. The log is based on the succession of 10 carbonate microfacies (MF1-10, standard sequence). The deepest microfacies (MF1) is open marine at the upper limit of the storm waves and the dysphotic-euphotic boundary. The shallowest sediments were partly emerged (lagoonal sediments, MF10). The exposed reefal lens (rudstones and framestones, MF6-7) and the flanks (grainstones, floatstones and coverstones, MF3-4-5) of the two other lenses are preserved due to early isopachous intergranular cement in the original cavities of the framestones or ‘intramicritic’ (replacement of the matrix) cementation in the floatstones and coverstones. The similarity of the facies and their algal content suggest that the sedimentary model proposed at Wellin is applicable at Nismes. Sequential analysis points to a three steps regressive evolution of the sedimentation probably related to a discontinuous subidence. The sequences have similar thicknesses (sixty or so meters) and grade from the dysphotic-euphotic boundary estimated here around twenty meters deep to emersion. As for Wellin, the subsidence is thus much more important than the eustatic regression

Why Europe Should Harden Its Soft Power to Lawfare

EU law has lost its shine as the legal gold standard. The so-called Brussels effect – the impact of EU law on its neighbours and global corporations operating in the single market, has been waning for years. Nowadays, its effect is mostly felt in anti-trust law, or in the chemicals directive or the General Data Protection Regulation.Covid-19 has sharpened Sino-American rivalry and accelerated the trend towards deglobalisation and a new cold war. Hope is fading that the EU on its own could set world standards on the ethical use of AI or rules on decarbonisation. To defend its interests in the international arena, the EU should consider more hard-nosed ways of instrumentalising the power of law

EU-US Relations: Reinventing the Transatlantic Agenda

With Joe Biden's victory, there is at least a four-year window to revive 'an alliance of democracies', face up to authoritarian powers and closed economies that exploit the openness on which American and European societies are built, and shape those parts of multilateralism that serve transatlantic interests

EEAS reloaded: recommendations for the 2013 review

The original Council Decision establishing the European External Action Service (EEAS) in 2010, called for a review of the organisation and functioning of the EEAS by mid-2013. This CEPS Commentary argues that the review process will offer a formal opportunity to address some of the Service's weaknesses and to give a new impetus to its further development. In particular, it urges stakeholders to go beyond a review of organisational matters and also look into the Service’s overall contribution to attaining the objectives of the EU’s foreign policy, into its cooperation with the member states’ diplomatic services, the services of the European Commission, the Council General Secretariat and the European Parliament. Four sets of recommendations are put forward