Carcass Yield and Subprimal Cutout Value of Beef, High- and Low-Yielding Beef × Dairy, and Dairy Steers

This study compared carcass yield and cutout value of conventional beef and dairy cattle to high-yielding (HY) and low-yielding (LY) crossbred beef × dairy cattle and identified the contribution of carcass regions to carcass yield andcutout value among beef × dairy crossbreds. Carcasses of conventional beef, beef × dairy crossbred, and dairy cattle were selected according to industry-average slaughter endpoints for their cattle type. Carcasses were fabricated at a commercial processing facility, and weights of carcass components were obtained. Post hoc subsampling was used to segregate HY and LY beef × dairy crossbreds based on subprimal yield. Multiple linear regression was used to assess carcass yield and sub-primal cutout value between the 4 cattle types (n=21 to 26 per cattle type). Beef cattle and HY crossbreds produced 1.59 to 3.04 percentage units greater (P<0.05) subprimal yield than LY crossbreds and dairy cattle. Dairy cattle produced at least 1.16 percentage units more (P<0.05) bone than any other cattle type. Subprimal to bone was not different (P>0.05) between HY crossbreds and beef cattle, and subprimal to fat was lesser (P<0.05) in HY crossbreds than beef cattle. Subprimal cutout value was more than 5 US dollars (USD)/45.4 kg different (P<0.05) between cattle types, which were ranked HY crossbreds > beef cattle > LY crossbreds > dairy cattle. In beef × dairy cattle, subprimal to bone in the round contributed most greatly to an increase (P=0.02), by 3.79 USD/45.4 kg, in subprimal cutout value. Together, these results suggested carcass value of beef × dairy cattle may be maximized when cattle are harvested at a lesser overall fatness than conventional beef cattle and when considerable muscling, especially in the round, is achieved

Expression of Beef- Versus Dairy-Type in Crossbred Beef × Dairy Cattle Does Not Impact Shape, Eating Quality, or Color of Strip Loin Steaks

Phenotypic expression of dairy influence often carries negative implications in beef production; thus, considerable variation in expression of beef- versus dairy-type might adversely affect value of crossbred beef × dairy cattle. This study evaluated effects of phenotype in crossbred beef × dairy cattle, specifically that associated with beef- versus dairy-type, on meat quality. Effects were blocked within commercial feedlot pens because cattle within a pen were contemporaries for sex, age, management, and source. On their harvest date, 592 Angus or [Simmental × Angus] × Holstein cattle from 9 pens were assessed by 3 expert evaluators. Scores for muscling and frame size were used to categorize and subset cattle in a pen into 4 phenotype groups: (1) fully dairy-type, (2) partially dairy-type, (3) partially beef-type, and (4) fully beef-type. Strip loin steaks were obtained from selected cattle (n = 82 to 84 per group) and evaluated for descriptive sensory attributes, shear force, pH, color at retail display, steak dimensions, muscle fiber type, and fatty acid composition. Data were tested for fixed effects of phenotype group with random effects of pen. Despite distinct expression of visual beef- versus dairy-type among cattle sampled, phenotype groups were largely not different (P > 0.05) in shape, sensory attributes, color, or biochemical properties of strip loin steaks. Other body regions, separate from the loin, were likely responsible for differences in live animal muscling. Additional research is needed on effects of sire breed, individual sire, and management strategies on meat quality in beef × dairy crossbreds. Complementarity of beef breeds and sires to produce more profitable beef-type cattle from the beef × dairy mating system should not be expected to negatively influence meat quality. Marketing programs rooted in production of consistent and premium products may benefit from including beef from beef × dairy crossbreds

Flavor, Tenderness, and Related Chemical Changes of Aged Beef Strip Loins

Varying aging times and methods were evaluated for their effect on flavor, tenderness, and related changes involatile compounds and flavor precursors. Strip loin sections from USDA Choice beef carcasses (n = 38) were randomly assigned to treatments: (1) 3 d wet-aged, (2) 14 d wet-aged, (3) 28 d wet-aged, (4) 35 d wet-aged, (5) 49 d wet-aged, (6) 63 d wet-aged, (7) 21 d dry-aged, and (8) 14 d wet-aged followed by 21 d dry-aged. Samples were analyzed for trained sensory attributes, shear force, volatile compounds, and flavor precursors (fatty acids, free amino acids, and sugars). Discriminant function analysis was used to identify sensory attributes contributing the greatest to treatment differences. Flavor notes were not differentiated in beef aged up to 35 d, regardless of aging method. A shift in flavor occurred between 35 d and 49 d of wet-aging time that was characterized by more intense sour and musty/earthy notes. Both shear force assessment and trained panelists agreed that tenderness was not affected (P > 0.05) by additional aging beyond 28 d. Volatile compound production and liberation of amino acids and sugars increased (P < 0.01) during the progression of aging time, with no change (P > 0.05) in fatty acid composition, which may be a result of metabolic processes like microbial metabolism. Chemical properties shared strong positive relationships (r > 0.50, P < 0.001) with sour, musty/earthy, and overall tenderness. These results substantiate the deteriorative effect of extended aging times of 49 d or greater on flavor of beef strip loins without tenderness improvement