Low-dose valganciclovir is efficacious and safe for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplantation

Background: Optimal valganciclovir (VGC) dosage and duration for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients remains controversial. This study aimed to determine GCV blood levels and efficacy/safety observed under low-dose oral VGC in kidney transplant recipients. Secondly, to quantify the variability of GCV blood levels, and its potential clinical impact. Methods: In this prospective study, each patient at risk for CMV undergoing kidney transplantation received low-dose VGC (450 mg qd) prophylaxis for 3 months, unless GFR was below 40 mL/min, in which case the dose was adapted to 450 mg every other day. GCV levels, at trough (Ctrough) and at peak (C3h) were measured monthly and CMV viremia was assessed during and after prophylaxis using real time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction. Adverse effects were recorded on each GCV sampling. Patients were followed up to one year after transplantation. Results: 38 kidney recipients (19 D+/R+, 11 D+/R-, 8 D-/R+) received 3-month VGC prophylaxis. Most patients (mean GFR of 59 mL/min) received 450 mg qd but the dose was reduced to 450 mg every other day in 6 patients with mean GFR of 22 mL/min. Average GCV C3h and Ctrough (regressed at 24h or 48h) were 3.9 mg/L (CV 33%, range: 1.3-8.2) and 0.4 mg/L (CV 111%, range 0.1-3.3). Population pharmacokinetic analysis showed a fair dispersion of the parameters mainly influenced by renal function. Despite this variability, patients remained aviremic during VGC prophylaxis. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (grade 2-4) were reported in 4% and 3% of patients respectively. During follow-up, asymptomatic CMV viremia was reported in 25% patients. One year after transplantation, 12% patients (all D+/R-) had developed a CMV disease, which was treated with a therapeutic 6-week course of oral VGC. Conclusion: Average GCV blood levels after oral administration of low-dose VGC in kidney transplant recipients were comparable to those previously reported with oral GCV prophylaxis, efficacious and well tolerated. Thus, a 3-month course of low-dose VGC is appropriate for the renal function of most kidney transplant recipients

Disposition of oral valganciclovir during continuous renal replacement therapy in two lung transplant recipients

Background: Oral valganciclovir (VGC) is hydrolysed into active ganciclovir (GCV) which is eliminated in the kidney by filtration and secretion. VGC dosage has to be adapted in renal failure with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), a condition sometimes encountered early after solid organ transplantation. This investigation aimed to determine whether VGC 450 mg every 48 hours provides appropriate GCV exposure for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis during CRRT. Methods: GCV pharmacokinetics were extensively studied during CRRT in two lung transplant recipients with acute renal failure receiving VGC 450 mg every 48 hours trough a nasogastric tube. In vitro experiments using blank whole blood spiked with GCV further investigated exchanges between plasma and erythrocytes. Results: GCV disposition was characterised by an area under the curve (AUC) of 98.0 and 55.4 mg h/L, resulting in trough concentrations of 0.7 and 0.2 mg/L, an apparent total body clearance of 3.3 and 5.8 L/h, a terminal half-life of 16.9 and 14.1 h, and an apparent volume of distribution of 60.3 and 104.9 L. The observed sieving coefficient (filtrate/plasma) was 1.05 and 0.96, and the hemofiltration clearance 3.3 and 3.1 L/h, respectively. High sieving values could be explained by an efflux of GCV from erythrocytes. In vitro experiments confirmed that erythrocytes are loaded with significant GCV amount and release it quickly into plasma, thus contributing to the apparent efficacy of hemofiltration. Conclusion: These results indicate that a VGC dosage of 450 mg every 48 hours was adequate for CMV prophylaxis during CRRT, providing GCV levels similar to those reported using 900 mg qd in transplant recipients with normal renal function

"Iatrogenicity cascade": doing harm by treating harm?

An electronic survey on substance-induced epileptic crisis was conducted in order to investigate whether doctors, who recognise their own prescription errors, increase their therapeutic aggressiveness, resulting in a so-called "iatrogenicity cascade". Two pairs of clinical vignettes were constructed, in which a patient suffers from iatrogenic (original version) or non-iatrogenic (control version) epileptic crisis. Vignettes were randomised and sent to doctors at the University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland, at an interval of 3 weeks. The results of the present survey in the surveyed population of doctors suggest that inappropriate prescription does not increase therapeutic aggressiveness