2 research outputs found
Correlates of zooplankton beta diversity in tropical lake systems
The changes in species composition between habitat patches (beta diversity) are likely related to a number of factors, including environmental heterogeneity, connectivity, disturbance and productivity. Here, we used data from aquatic environments in five Brazilian regions over two years and two seasons (rainy and dry seasons or high and low water level periods in floodplain lakes) in each year to test hypotheses underlying zooplankton beta diversity variation. The regions present different levels of hydrological connectivity, where three regions present lakes that are permanent and connected with the main river, while the water bodies of the other two regions consist of permanent lakes and temporary ponds, with no hydrological connections between them. We tested for relationships between zooplankton beta diversity and environmental heterogeneity, spatial extent, hydrological connectivity, seasonality, disturbance and productivity. Negative relationships were detected between zooplankton beta diversity and both hydrological connectivity and disturbance (periodic dry-outs). Hydrological connectivity is likely to affect beta diversity by facilitating dispersal between habitats. In addition, the harsh environmental filter imposed by disturbance selected for only a small portion of the species from the regional pool that were able to cope with periodic dry-outs (e.g., those with a high production of resting eggs). In summary, this study suggests that faunal exchange and disturbance play important roles in structuring local zooplankton communitie
Evidence against the use of surrogates for biomonitoring of Neotropical floodplains
1. Community concordance measures the level of association between the compositional patterns
shown by two groups of organisms. If strong community concordance occurs, one group could be
used as a surrogate for another in conservation planning and biodiversity monitoring. In this
study, we evaluated the variability in the strength of community concordance, the likely
mechanisms underlying community concordance and the degree to which one community can
predict another in a set of Neotropical floodplain lakes (Upper Parana´ River floodplain, Brazil).
2. We used a data set including six aquatic communities: fish, macrophytes, benthic macroinvertebrates,
zooplankton, phytoplankton and periphyton. We used Mantel and PROTEST
approaches to evaluate the levels of community concordance in up to four sampling periods. Also,
we used partial Mantel test and information about biotic interactions to investigate reasons for
observed patterns of concordance. Finally, we used co-correspondence analysis to evaluate the
performance of one taxonomic group in predicting the structures of other communities.
3. The levels of community concordance varied over time for almost all cross-taxa comparisons.
Concordance between phytoplankton and periphyton probably resulted from similar responses to
environmental gradients, whereas other patterns of concordance were likely generated by
interactions among groups. However, the levels of predictability were low, and no particular
taxonomic group significantly predicted all other groups.
4. The low and temporally variable levels of community concordance cast doubts on the use of
surrogate groups for biodiversity management in Neotropical floodplains.