Bone health in children with Angelman syndrome at the ENCORE Expertise Center

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare genetic disorder due to lack of UBE3A function on chromosome 15q11.2q13 caused by a deletion, uniparental paternal disomy (UPD), imprinting center disorder (ICD), or pathological variant of the UBE3A gene. AS is characterized by developmental delay, epilepsy, and lack of speech. Although fractures are observed frequently in our clinical practice, there are few studies on bone health in AS. The aim of this study is to investigate bone health in children with AS. In this prospective cohort study, we describe bone health in 91 children with AS visiting the ENCORE Expertise Center for AS between April 2010 and December 2021. Bone health was assessed with the bone health index (BHI) in standard deviation score (SDS) measured by digital radiogrammetry of the left hand using BoneXpert software. Risk factors analyzed were age, sex, genetic subtype, epilepsy, anti-seizure medication use, mobility, body mass index (BMI), and onset of puberty. Children with AS had a mean BHI of −1.77 SDS (SD 1.4). A significantly lower BHI was found in children with a deletion (−2.24 SDS) versus non-deletion (−1.02 SDS). Other factors associated with reduced BHI-SDS were inability to walk and late onset of puberty. Children with a history of one or more fractures (22%) had a significantly lower BHI than children without fractures (−2.60 vs −1.56 SDS). Longitudinal analysis showed a significant decrease in BHI-SDS with age in all genetic subtypes. Conclusions: Children with AS have a reduced bone health. Risk factors are deletion genotype, no independent walking, and late onset of puberty. Bone health decreased significantly with age. What is Known: • Children with neurological disorders often have a low bone health and higher risk of fractures. • Little is known about bone health in children with Angelman syndrome (AS). What is New: • Children with AS showed a reduced bone health and this was significantly associated with having a deletion, not being able to walk independently, and late onset of puberty. • Longitudinal analysis showed a significant decrease in bone health as children got older.</p

Interdependence of clinical factors predicting cognition in children with tuberous sclerosis complex

Cognitive development in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex is highly variable. Predictors in the infant years would be valuable to counsel parents and to support development. The aim of this study was to confirm factors that have been reported to be independently correlated with cognitive development. 102 patients included in this study were treated at the ENCORE-TSC expertise center of the Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia Children’s Hospital. Data from the first 24 months of life were used, including details on epilepsy, motor development and mutation status. Outcome was defined as cognitive development (intellectual equivalent, IE) as measured using tests appropriate to the patients age and cognitive abilities (median age at testing 8.2 years, IQR 4.7–12.0). Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used. In a univariable analysis, predictors of lower IE were: the presence of infantile spasms (β = −18.3, p = 0.000), a larger number of antiepileptic drugs used (β = −6.3, p = 0.000), vigabatrin not used as first drug (β = −14.6, p = 0.020), corticosteroid treatment (β = −33.2, p = 0.005), and a later age at which the child could walk independently (β = −2.1, p = 0.000). An older age at seizure onset predicted higher IE (β = 1.7, p = 0.000). In a multivariable analysis, only age at seizure onset was significantly correlated to IE (β = 1.2, p = 0.005), contributing to 28% of the variation in IE. In our cohort, age at seizure onset was the only variable that independently predicted IE. Factors predicting cognitive development could aid parents and physicians in finding the appropriate support and schooling for these patients

An overview of health issues and development in a large clinical cohort of children with Angelman syndrome

This study presents a broad overview of health issues and psychomotor development of 100 children with Angelman syndrome (AS), seen at the ENCORE Expertise Center for AS in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. We aimed to further delineate the phenotype of AS, to evaluate the association of the phenotype with genotype and other determinants such as epilepsy and to get insight in possible targets for intervention. We confirmed the presence of a more severe phenotype in the 15q11.2-q13 deletion subtype. Novel findings were an association of (early onset of) epilepsy with a negative effect on development, a high occurrence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus, a high rate of crouch gait in the older children with risk of deterioration of mobility, a relatively low occurrence of microcephaly, a higher mean weight for height in all genetic subtypes with a significant higher mean in the nondeletion children, and a high occurrence of hyperphagia across all genetic subtypes. Natural history data are needed to design future trials. With this large clinical cohort with structured prospective and multidisciplinary follow-up, we provide unbiased data on AS to support further intervention studies to optimize outcome and quality of life of children with AS and their family

Sleep problems in children with Angelman Syndrome: The effect of a behavioral intervention program

Background & aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a behavioral intervention on sleep problems, which are significant and an unmet clinical need in children with Angelman Syndrome (AS). Methods & procedures: Children (2–18 years) with AS and sleep problems were randomized to a behavioral intervention program or a control group. Intervention consisted of a standardized program including home visits, psycho-education, feedback based on direct observation of bedtime routine and video footage of the night and behavioral treatment techniques by a behavioral therapist. Change in sleep duration (primary) and parental sleep, nighttime visits, sleep hygiene, daytime behavior, parental stress and quality of life (secondary) were assessed post-intervention and at follow-up using questionnaires, diary, actigraphy and videosomnography. Outcomes & results: The groups, 9 children in each, did not differ at baseline. We found a significant effect of intervention on wake after sleep onset with classical statistical analysis (videosomnography). With single case analysis we found a positive effect on total sleep time (diary and actigraphy) and wake after sleep onset (diary) with a persistent effect on total sleep time (actigraphy) and wake after sleep onset (diary). On secondary outcome there was a significant and persistent effect on sleep hygiene and several quality of life domains. Conclusions & implications: Behavioral intervention has a positive and persistent effect on sleep problems in children with AS. We advise psycho-education for all parents and use of videosomnography for both evaluation of and feedback on sleep behavior patterns, individual behavioral advice and specific behavioral techniques for children with sleep problems

Clinical aspects of a large group of adults with Angelman syndrome

Descriptions of the clinical features of Angelman syndrome (AS) have mainly been focused on children. Here, we describe the evolution of the clinical phenotypes of AS in adulthood, using clinical data from 95 individuals (mean age 31.6 years, median 29.0 years, range 18–83 years), with genetically confirmed AS. Data was collected through physical examination and inspection of medical records, combined with questionnaires and interviews. Adults with AS experience substantial debilitating health problems. Constipation, reflux, visual problems, scoliosis, behavioral and sleeping problems occurred frequently and require appropriate attention. Epilepsy was reported in 57% of adults, negatively affecting the level of functioning. Non-convulsive status epilepticus was not observed in the adults, however some individuals developed prolonged episodes of rhythmic shaking while awake. A decline in mobility was noted in the majority of adults. A minority of adults with AS showed microcephaly. Taken together, this first phenotypic study of adults with AS to include in person interviews with care-givers and physical examination of patients, including the eldest adult reported to date, provides important insight in the development of the syndrome into adulthood. This knowledge is required to improve care for adult individuals with AS and to evaluate future therapies for this group

A multidisciplinary approach and consensus statement to establish standards of care for Angelman syndrome

Background: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare neurogenetic disorder present in approximately 1/12,000 individuals and characterized by developmental delay, cognitive impairment, motor dysfunction, seizures, gastrointestinal concerns, and abnormal electroencephalographic background. AS is caused by absent expression of the paternally imprinted gene UBE3A in the central nervous system. Disparities in the management of AS are a major problem in preparing for precision therapies and occur even in patients with access to experts and recognized clinics. AS patients receive care based on collective provider experience due to limited evidence-based literature. We present a consensus statement and comprehensive literature review that proposes a standard of care practices for the management of AS at a critical time when therapeutics to alter the natural history of the disease are on the horizon. Methods: We compiled the key recognized clinical features of AS based on consensus from a team of specialists managing patients with AS. Working groups were established to address each focus area with committees comprised of providers who manage >5 individuals. Committees developed management guidelines for their area of expertise. These were compiled into a final document to provide a framework for standardizing management. Evidence from the medical literature was also comprehensively reviewed. Results: Areas covered by working groups in the consensus document include genetics, developmental medicine, psychology, general health concerns, neurology (including movement disorders), sleep, psychiatry, orthopedics, ophthalmology, communication, early intervention and therapies, and caregiver health. Working groups created frameworks, including flowcharts and tables, to help with quick access for providers. Data from the literature were incorporated to ensure providers had review of experiential versus evidence-based care guidelines. Conclusion: Standards of care in the management of AS are keys to ensure optimal care at a critical time when new disease-modifying therapies are emerging. This document is a framework for providers of all familiarity levels