19 research outputs found
Bookreview of: Roland Brake and Ulrich Deller (eds): Community Development—A European Challenge
This edited volume contains more than 20 chapters of varying lengths on the topic
of community development in various European countries (and one chapter from an
American perspective). All contributions emerged from the EU-funded project
‘Community Care Approach: A Strategy for Social Inclusion’, running from around
2005 to 2008. The various chapters aim to deal with issues such as the relevance of
community development approaches for the working practices of social work, how
socio-economic projects are developed and implemented, assessing the experiences
in the different countries and considering their applicability for other countries, and
last but not least, the (negative) influence of politics on community work. The
introductory chapter by the editors identifies the ‘tension between the official
support [funding] on the one hand and the autonomous community development
actions that are sometimes directed against the authorities on the other’ (Brake and
Deller, 11) a
Explaining slow economic growth and poor social development indicators: The case of Morocco
Drawing on elements of a political economy framework, this paper addresses two
inter-related questions with regard to economic growth and public expenditure
patterns in Morocco. The main factors that help explain Morocco’s relatively slow
economic growth for the last few decades have to do with problems of:
• representation (policy makers mainly represented their own and family/clan
interests rather than the public at large);
• coordination (coordination among ministries is constrained by the centralized
nature of information and power); and
• commitment (to the trade and economic liberalization as well as privatization
policies, linked to rent seeking activities by certain interests groups).
An overarching trend is the disproportionate influence of political considerations on economic decisions. The paper illustrates this point with numerous examples,
including the tax exemption of the agricultural sector.
The second part of the paper identifies the main causes of Morocco’s disappointing
social development indicators compared to other middle-income countries. These
causes are mainly linked to unsatisfactory outcomes in the education sector, and
weak pro-poor targeting of government programs, which can in turn be explained by
political economy imperatives discussed in the first part of the paper
Constraints to strengthening public sector accountability through civil society: the case of Morocco
This paper discusses the extent to which civil society contributes to strengthening public sector accountability in Morocco. The main argument in this paper is that despite a few recent encouraging examples, civil society’s role in strengthening public sector accountability remains limited at both the national and local levels. This is due to three main reasons. The first relates to
certain characteristics of the Moroccan governance system, including the dominance of upward accountability mechanisms, given the unique position of the King. The second set of reasons refers to certain internal features of the Moroccan civil society. The third reason can be found in civil society’s position with regard to its external environment, i.e., the nature of its relationships with the public sector in the form of both local governments and ministerial public administrations
To Know is to be empowered
Celia Reyes is senior research fellow at the Philippine Institute for
Development Studies, and is affiliated with the Angelo King Institute for
Economic and Business Studies at De La Salle University in Manila,
Philippines. One of her major research interests is the impact of policies
and programmes on poverty and equity. She directed the Micro Impacts
of Macroeconomic Adjustment Policies (MIMAP) project in the
Philippines, supported by the International Development Research
Centre (IDRC) in Canada
Traditional village councils, modern associations, and the emergence of hybrid political orders in rural Morocco
This essay aims to emphasize the relevance and analytical usefulness of the concept of hybrid political orders with regard to a state and a society that is neither in a post-war nor peace-building situation. Rather, the case of rural Morocco illustrates how hybrid political orders emerge over time, in the context of post-colonial state-building in general, and in the context of decentralization reforms, the proliferation of participatory
programs, and the growth of ‘‘civil society’’ in particular
Bookreview on: Jenny Pearce (ed.): Participation and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century City
This edited volume brings together six urban case studies (three in the UK and three
in Latin America) that together try to ‘‘draw out the potentialities, record the
transforming moments as well as recognise the limitations of new participation
spaces’’ (p. 252). While it is not a comparative study, the volume claims to ‘‘offer
insight into the conditions which make participation feasible, self-generating,
meaningful and progressive and which do not’’ (p. 253). This book is the product of
a two-year research project entitled ‘‘Municipal Innovations in Non-Governmental
Public Participation UK/Latin America’’, funded by the UK’s Economic and Social
Science Research Council
Can there be a developmental state in Morocco? Finding the right balance between autonomy and embeddedness
Abstract
This paper draws on Peter Evans’ approach to the developmental state and applies it
to examine the scope for state-society synergy at the local level in Morocco. In doing
so, it highlights the usefulness of Evans’ concept of ‘embedded autonomy’ for
theorizing about the developmental state. The paper studies the internal and
interactive capacities of local government and local civil society organizations in
Morocco. It argues that there are certain pre-conditions with regard to state capacity
which enable complementarity and embeddedness to emerge. The main finding of the
paper though (drawing on my extensive fieldwork in two rural municipalities in
Morocco) is the high degree of political instrumentalisation that characterizes the
relationships between local government and local civil society. The paper therefore
aims to enrich the debate on the developmental state by emphasizing the importance
of finding the right balance between autonomy and embeddedness if networks that
cross the public-private divide are to lead to developmentally valuable outcomes
Partnerships as entities, agreements, and venues to interact: The case of the Uganda AIDS Commission and the Uganda HIV/AIDS Partnership
Partnerships as a framework for development have long been used in the delivery of
public policy and programmes. However, the literature suggests that the concept of
partnership is often uncritically used and partnerships are understood and practised
differently in the delivery of public services. Yet there is little research on the
discourse, interests and practices of partnership arrangements and the range of
structural factors and agendas underlying these relationships. This article is based on
a rapid assessment of the HIV/AIDS Partnership in Uganda as coordinated by the
Uganda AIDS Commission (UAC) to explore: (i) how actors (and the UAC in
particular) understand the concept of partnership in everyday development delivery
and (ii) how actors (and the UAC in particular) practise the concept of partnersh
Plus ça Change? Observing the Dynamics of Morocco's ‘Arab Spring’ in the High Atlas
This contribution focuses on the ‘Arab Spring’ in Morocco and on the
interactions between the mainly urban-based activists that made up the 20 February
Movement (F20M), and the population in rural areas. Based on six weeks of fieldwork
between November 2013 and March 2014, mostly in the areas in and near Marrakech, we find
that while the urban F20M events stimulated and inspired protests in rural areas, in practice
there were only sporadic contacts based on the activists’ personal feelings of belonging rather
than their organizational membership. This is mainly due to discursive disconnects between
the centre and periphery. As for the outcomes, in particular the new constitution, many
respondents believe that nothing has changed so far