53 research outputs found
Unravelling the molecular determinants of bee sensitivity to neonicotinoid insecticides
This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.The impact of neonicotinoid insecticides on the health of bee pollinators is a topic of intensive research and considerable current debate [1]. As insecticides, certain neonicotinoids, i.e., N-nitroguanidine compounds such as imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, are as intrinsically toxic to bees as to the insect pests they target. However, this is not the case for all neonicotinoids, with honeybees orders of magnitude less sensitive to N-cyanoamidine compounds such as thiacloprid [2]. Although previous work has suggested that this is due to rapid metabolism of these compounds [2, 3, 4, 5], the specific gene(s) or enzyme(s) involved remain unknown. Here, we show that the sensitivity of the two most economically important bee species to neonicotinoids is determined by cytochrome P450s of the CYP9Q subfamily. Radioligand binding and inhibitor assays showed that variation in honeybee sensitivity to N-nitroguanidine and N-cyanoamidine neonicotinoids does not reside in differences in their affinity for the receptor but rather in divergent metabolism by P450s. Functional expression of the entire CYP3 clade of P450s from honeybees identified a single P450, CYP9Q3, that metabolizes thiacloprid with high efficiency but has little activity against imidacloprid. We demonstrate that bumble bees also exhibit profound differences in their sensitivity to different neonicotinoids, and we identify CYP9Q4 as a functional ortholog of honeybee CYP9Q3 and a key metabolic determinant of neonicotinoid sensitivity in this species. Our results demonstrate that bee pollinators are equipped with biochemical defense systems that define their sensitivity to insecticides and this knowledge can be leveraged to safeguard bee health.his study received funding from Bayer AG. C.B. received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unionβs Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 646625 ). C.B. and K.B. received funding from Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, award number 15076182 ). The work at Rothamsted forms part of the Smart Crop Protection (SCP) strategic programme ( BBS/OS/CP/000001 ) funded through the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilβs Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund
The Plasmodium Export Element Revisited
We performed a bioinformatical analysis of protein export elements (PEXEL) in the putative proteome of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. A protein family-specific conservation of physicochemical residue profiles was found for PEXEL-flanking sequence regions. We demonstrate that the family members can be clustered based on the flanking regions only and display characteristic hydrophobicity patterns. This raises the possibility that the flanking regions may contain additional information for a family-specific role of PEXEL. We further show that signal peptide cleavage results in a positional alignment of PEXEL from both proteins with, and without, a signal peptide
N-Glycans and Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-Anchor Act on Polarized Sorting of Mouse PrPC in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells
The cellular prion protein (PrPC) plays a fundamental role in prion disease. PrPC is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein with two variably occupied N-glycosylation sites. In general, GPI-anchor and N-glycosylation direct proteins to apical membranes in polarized cells whereas the majority of mouse PrPC is found in basolateral membranes in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. In this study we have mutated the first, the second, and both N-glycosylation sites of PrPC and also replaced the GPI-anchor of PrPC by the Thy-1 GPI-anchor in order to investigate the role of these signals in sorting of PrPC in MDCK cells. Cell surface biotinylation experiments and confocal microscopy showed that lack of one N-linked oligosaccharide leads to loss of polarized sorting of PrPC. Exchange of the PrPC GPI-anchor for the one of Thy-1 redirects PrPC to the apical membrane. In conclusion, both N-glycosylation and GPI-anchor act on polarized sorting of PrPC, with the GPI-anchor being dominant over N-glycans
The flagellar developmental cycle in algae: two types of flagellar development in uniflagellate algae
Flagellar development during cell division was studied by light microscopy in three taxa of uniflagellated algae, Pedinomonas tuberculata (Chlorophyta), Monomastix spec. (Chlorophyta), and Pseudopedinella elastica (Chromophyta). As shown by electron microscopy during interphase M. spec, and P. elastica contain a mature, non-functional second basal body, and P. tuberculata contains an immature (i.e., shorter) non-functional second basal body. Two different types of flagellar development were observed in the three taxa: in P. tuberculata the parental flagellum is transferred to one of the progeny cells, whereas the other progeny cell receives a newly formed flagellum that grows from the second non-functional basal body. In M. spec. and P. elastica the parental flagellum is either completely retracted (P. elastica) or partially retracted and autotomized (M. spec); each dividing cell develops two new flagella (from two newly formed basal bodies) which are distributed to the two progeny cells. The uniflagellated condition in algae can thus be attained by two completely different mechanisms: a non-functional second basal body is either the younger (no. 2; in P. tuberculata and other Chlorophyta) or the older (no. 1; in P. elastica and presumably other Chromophyta) of the two basal bodies
- β¦