6 research outputs found

    Outcomes in Knot vs Knotless Surgery in Labrum Tears

    Get PDF
    A Bankart lesion is a tear of the anterior and inferior glenoid labrum. The primary method of repairing this lesion is to sew the detached part back to the joint, however there is a relatively newer method of doing so that does not involve tying a knot in the joint which may cause less joint irritation. The question our research project attempted to answer was: How do the long-term outcomes associated with knotless Bankart labrum repairs compare with the knot repairs? A retrospective cohort study was done with Rothman Institute Bankart lesion patients from 2010-2016. Data was gathered over phone calls and responses to certain categorical questions like motion, function, stability and return to OR were measured on a scale 0-3. The mean score of these categories was calculated and many of them were close to identical. One category where there was some degree of difference was stability (0=no subluxation, 3=recurrent dislocation). Those who had the knot surgery reported a mean of 1.53 level of instability and those who had the knotless surgery reported a mean of 1.13. It was previously hypothesized that the knotless surgery would have fewer detrimental effects and although this is possible with a lower instability rating, the results were not statistically significant since the p-value was 0.43. However, it is possible that this result can be clinically significant for surgeons when deciding which surgical technique to employ

    A Clinical Decision Support Tool to Predict the Risk of Failure in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Undergoing Hip Preservation Surgery

    Get PDF
    In modern orthopaedics, risk prediction scores can help discriminate between ideal and poor candidates for a specifi­c therapeutic intervention. We consider these tools useful during the process of shared medical decision-making1. To our knowledge, such a strategy has never been explored in the ­field of hip preservation surgery. The aim of our study is to generate a clinical decision support tool to predict risk of failure after hip preservation surgery among patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)

    Outcomes of chronic distal biceps reconstruction with tendon grafting: a matched comparison with primary repair.

    Get PDF
    Background: The purpose of this analysis was to analyze outcomes of distal biceps reconstruction with soft tissue allograft in the setting of chronic, irreparable distal biceps ruptures. The outcomes of these cases were then compared with a matched cohort of distal biceps ruptures that were able to be repaired primarily. Methods: Retrospective review of an institutional elbow surgery database was conducted. All cases of distal biceps repairs were identified by Common Procedural Terminology, ICD-9, and ICD-10 codes from January 2009 to March 2018. A direct review of operative reports was then conducted to identify which cases required allograft reconstruction. After identification of this population, a 2:1 manually matched cohort of patients who underwent primary repair was generated using age, gender, body mass index, and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index. Finally, the allograft reconstruction and matched primary repair cohorts were compared for reoperation, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes scores. Results: There were 46 male patients who underwent distal biceps reconstruction with allograft (14 Achilles tendon, 32 semitendinosus) and they were matched to 92 male patients that underwent primary distal biceps repair. Mean patient age (46.9 ± 10.3 vs. 47.0 ± 9.8 years, P = .95), BMI (31.3 ± 5.3 vs. 31.3 ± 4.8 kg/m2, P = .60), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.2 ± 1.1 vs. 1.3 ± 0.9, P = .64) were similar between allograft reconstruction and primary repair groups. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (7.4 ± 18.0 vs. 1.6 ± 4.1, P = .23), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (92.1 ± 19.7 vs. 97.3 ± 6.4, P = .36), and Oxford Elbow Score (43.4 ± 11.0 vs. 46.8 ± 3.2, P = .25) were not significantly different between groups at mean 5.1 years (range, 1.5-10.9 years) after surgery. There were 1 of 42 (2.2%) allograft patients who require revision compared with 3 of 92 (3.3%, P = .719) in the primary repair group. In addition, one primary repair required reoperation for scar tissue excision and lateral antebrachial cutaneous neurolysis. Final range of motion data (twelve-week follow-up) for the allograft reconstruction group was similar to primary repair group in flexion (136.1° ± 5.3° vs. 135.9° ± 2.7°, P = .81), extension (0.8° ± 2.9° vs. 0.4° ± 1.7°, P = .53), pronation (78.0° ± 9.0° vs. 76.4° ± 15.4°, P = .50), supination (77.4° ± 10.7° vs. 77.5° ± 11.9°, P = .96). Conclusion: Patients who underwent distal biceps reconstruction with a graft had similar failure rates, reoperation rates, final range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes scores as those treated without a graft. Patients can be consulted that direct repair in the acute setting is preferred; however, even in the setting of a distal biceps reconstruction with graft augmentation, they can expect low complications and good functional results

    The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview

    Get PDF
    Aziz Sheikh and colleagues report the findings of their systematic overview that assessed the impact of eHealth solutions on the quality and safety of health care

    Total Ankle Arthroplasty

    No full text
    Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Reports of ankle range of motion and how it affects patient outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) have been mixed. Furthermore, recent studies have relied on clinical exam to obtain postoperative range of motion and have lacked preoperative functional scores. The purpose of our study was to analyze how preoperative range of motion and functional scores change with time following TAA using postoperative functional scores and radiographs for range of motion calculations. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 107 patients (109 ankles) that had undergone fixed-bearing implant TAA by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2015. Preoperative range of motion was gathered clinically in office by the senior author. Postoperative range of motion through the ankle joint was evaluated with dedicated weight-bearing maximum dorsiflexion and plantarflexion lateral radiographs at 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years. The range of motion was measured using the angle measurement tool on the picture archiving and communication system. Patients completed visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire subcategorized into activities of daily (ADL) and sports subscale preoperatively and at postoperative intervals of 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years. The mean age was 65 years (range, 31-83 years). Mean BMI was 28.1 (range, 14.9-44.9). There were 53 males (50%). Results: The mean total arc of ankle motion preoperatively was 20.7 degrees and improved significantly to 28.3, 34.3, 33.3, and 33.3 degrees at 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years, respectively (P<0.001) (Figure 1). Mean VAS pain and mean FAAM ADL preoperative scores improved significantly at each postoperative time point as seen in Figure 1 (P<0.001). Increased ankle range of motion was correlated with lower VAS preoperatively (r=-0.38, P=0.007), and at 1 year (r=-0.36, P<0.001), and 2 years (r=-0.2, P=0.033) postoperatively. Increased ankle range of motion was significantly correlated with higher FAAM-ADL at 3 months (r=0.48, P=0.012), 1 year (r=0.24, P<0.034), and 2 years (r=0.37, P<0.001) postoperatively. Conclusion: Patients undergoing fixed-bearing TAA had continued and sustained improvement from preoperative total arc of motion, pain, and function at each postoperative visit, up to 2 years. Ankle range of motion was noted to peak at 6 months, while pain and FAAM-ADL continued to improve up to 2 years postoperatively. Patients with greater ankle range of motion correlated with less pain and improved function at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Though pain and function may continue to improve even as far out as 2 years postoperatively, it is not likely that range of motion will continue to increase

    Ecological processes underlying the emergence of novel enzootic cycles: Arboviruses in the neotropics as a case study

    No full text
    corecore