20 research outputs found
Radiotherapy Timing in 4,820 Patients With Breast Cancer: University of Florence Experience
PURPOSE:
To analyze the relationship between a delay in radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery and ipsilateral breast recurrence (BR).
METHODS AND MATERIALS:
We included in our analysis 4,820 breast cancer patients who had undergone postoperative RT at the University of Florence. The patients were categorized into four groups according to the interval between surgery and RT (T1, 180 days).
RESULTS:
On multivariate analysis, the timing of RT did not reach statistical significance in patients who received only postoperative RT (n = 1,935) or RT and hormonal therapy (HT) (n = 1,684) or RT, chemotherapy (CHT), and HT (n = 529). In the postoperative RT-only group, age at presentation, surgical margin status, and a boost to the tumor bed were independent prognostic factors for BR. In the RT plus HT group, age at presentation and boost emerged as independent prognostic factors for BR (p = 0.006 and p = 0.049, respectively). Finally, in the RT, CHT, and HT group, only multifocality was an independent BR predictor (p = 0.01). Only in the group of patients treated with RT and CHT (n = 672) did multivariate analysis with stepwise selection show RT timing as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.52; p = 0.045). Analyzing this group of patients, we found that most patients included had worse prognostic factors and had received CHT consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil before undergoing RT.
CONCLUSION:
The results of our study have shown that the timing of RT itself does not affect local recurrence, which is mainly related to prognostic factors. Thus, the "waiting list" should be thought of as a "programming list," with patients scheduled for RT according to their prognostic factors
Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma: a single institution retrospective analysis and a review of the literature
BACKGROUND:  Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is a rare low-grade brain tumor. To date, limited studies have analyzed factors affecting survival outcomes and defined the therapeutic strategy. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics of PXA and identify factors associated with outcomes. METHODS:  We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 16 adult and children patients with PXA who underwent primary resection from 1997 to 2019, referred to our Radiation Oncology Unit and to Meyer’s Paediatric Hospital. We also reviewed the relevant literature. RESULTS:  All patients underwent primary surgical resection; 10 patients received adjuvant radiation treatment course, ranging from DTF 54 to 64 Gy; 8 of them received, in addition, concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy; 6 patients underwent only radiological follow-up. After a median follow up was 60 months: median OS was 34.9 months (95% CI 30–218), 1-year OS 87%, 5-years OS 50%, 10-years OS 50%; median PFS 24.4 months (95% CI 13–156), 1-year PFS 80%, 5-years PFS 33%, 10-years PFS 33%. A chi-square test showed a significant association between OS and recurrent disease (p = 0.002) and with chemotherapy adjuvant treatment (p = 0.049). A borderline statistical significant association was instead recognized with BRAF mutation (p = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: Despite our analysis did not reveal a strong prognostic or predictive factor able to address pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma management; however, in selected patients could be considered the addition of adjuvant radiation chemotherapy treatment after adequate neurosurgical primary resection. Furthermore, recurrent disease evidenced a detrimental impact on survival
From a waiting list to a priority list: A computerized model for an easy-to-manage and automatically updated priority list in the booking of patients waiting for radiotherapy
Aims and background. Waiting time for radiotherapy is a major problem in clinical practice. We developed a model to create a priority list of patients waiting for radiotherapy according to clinical criteria, where booking of patients is not on a "firstcome, first-served" basis and where prioritization has not been left up to individual discretion. Methods. The system is based on an algorithm that assigns to each patient a personal code (priority code, PC) that can be used as a continuous variable to have a priority list. PCpatient = D0patient + PWT subgroup of treatment. Palliative treatments were categorized according to the clinical urgency. Radical treatments were stratified by primary tumors, by the setting of treatment (preoperative, curative, postoperative) and by the main prognostic factors. Each subgroup of patients has a "priority waiting time" (PWT subgroup of treatment). Calculation of the PC starts from a differentiated date according to clinical scenario [Reference date (D0)], which is taken from the clinical history of the patient. Results. Patients are differentiated according to clinical criteria and according to time elapsed from diagnosis. The priority list can be automatically updated day by day. Delays in patient referral or imaging availability are minimized. Conclusions. The model represents a tool for an objective and automatic prioritization of the patients who are waiting for radiotherapy. © II Pensiero Scientifico Editore downloaded by EXCERPTA MEDICA
Role of chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a unique malignant head and neck cancer with clinical, demographic, and geographic features distinct from other head and neck epithelial malignancies. Non-keratinizing, poorly differentiated, and undifferentiated WHO types 2 and 3 is the most common subtypes of NPC. NPC is also characterized by its relatively high sensitivity to radiation, so that in the last decades radiotherapy (RT) has been the cornerstone of treatment. However, in the majority of cases NPC is discovered at locally advanced stage. The results are disappointing when RT alone is offered. The 5-year survival rates have been reported to be about 34-52%. The poor prognosis for advanced NPC led to increasing interests in exploring the use of chemotherapy (CT). NPC has been considered to be not only radiosensitive but also chemo-sensitive and has shown high response rate to various chemotherapeutic agents. Certainly, the treatment strategies for NPC will continue to change and evolve as a better understanding is gained of the molecular and immune mechanisms that drive this disease. We reviewed the current literature focusing on the role of CT and new-targeted agents. © Copyright F. Paiar et al., 2012
Survival and breast relapse in 3834 patients with T1-T2 breast cancer after conserving surgery and adjuvant treatment
PURPOSE:
The aim of the present analysis is to determine the long-term results in terms of breast relapse and specific survival in patients treated with conserving surgery and adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer.
METHODS:
From January 1980 to December 2001, 3834 patients with pT1-T2 breast cancer were treated consecutively at the University of Florence. The median age of the patient population was 55 years (range 30-80). All patients were followed for a median of 7.4 years (range 0.6 year to 22.5 years). The crude probability of survival (or local recurrence) was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier method, and survival (or local recurrence) comparisons were carried out using Cox proportional hazard regression models.
RESULTS:
The Cox regression model by stepwise selection showed some parameters, such as chemotherapy (HR 1.53; CI 1.19-1.95), pT status (HR 1.62, CI 1.31-2.01), positive axillary lymph nodes (HR 1.92, CI 1.66-2.22), and local recurrence (HR 4.58; CI 3.66-5.73), as independent prognostic factors for breast cancer death. Moreover, we found lower rate survival among patients treated before 1991 in comparison to women treated after 1991 (p=0.0001) probably due to inadequate treatment. For local disease free survival, age at presentation (HR 0.47; CI 0.35-0.63), use of tamoxifen (HR 0.42; CI 0.25-0.71), surgical margins (HR 2.00; CI 1.21-3.30), and chemotherapy (HR 0.53; CI 0.31-0.91) emerged by multivariate analyses as significant breast relapse predictors.
CONCLUSION:
In our experience breast conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy treatment gives high rates of local control in women with early breast cancer. The use of routinely adjuvant chemotherapy and hormone therapy lowered the local recurrence and probably the modification of therapeutic approach in the last decades also improved the specific survival
Alternating intravenous and oral vinorelbine plus epirubicin with pegfilgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced breast cancer
In order to downstage locally advanced breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m plus epirubicin 75 mg/m given on day 1 and oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m on day 8 was administered every 3 weeks for four courses. On day 2, all patients received a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (6 mg). From March 2004 to June 2005, 22 patients were enrolled. Patients characteristics were: median age, 53 years (range: 39-70 years); postmenopausal, 7/22; clinical TNM stage, T2 (n=14), T3 (n=8), N0 (n=17) and N1 (n=5). The median number of courses was four (range: two to six courses) with full dose intensity. National Cancer Institute grade 3 haematological toxicities observed were neutropenia in 9% of patients, anaemia in 13% of patients and thrombocytopenia in 9% of patients; no toxicity grade 4 occurred. Two patients (9%) registered grade 2 polyneuropathy; no cardiac failure was observed. Conservative surgery was performed in 14 patients (63%). All patients were evaluable for response: complete pathological response was documented in three patients (13.6%); three patients (13.6%) obtained more than 75% of tumour size reduction; 11 other patients (50%) had 50% of tumour size reduction; stable disease was observed in five patients (22.7%). The present findings indicate that vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin is an effective and safe treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: this regimen obtained more than 50% of tumour size reduction in 77% of patients; the use of pegfilgrastim allowed full dose intensity. Oral vinorelbine on day 8 offers greater convenience to the patient by reducing the need for intravenous injection and the time spent in hospital
Prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concurrent radiochemotherapy
This study was undertaken to evaluate the association of individual parameters and outcome in patients with unresectable locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with radiochemotherapy
Salvage stereotactic re-irradiation with CyberKnife for locally recurrent head and neck cancer: A single center experience
Aims and background. We report the toxicity and preliminary clinical outcome in patients affected by locally recurrent head and neck cancer treated with stereotactic reirradiation. Methods: Between February 2012 and August 2013, 17 patients were treated with CyberKnife as stereotactic re-irradiation for locally recurrent head and neck cancer. All patients had previously received a full dose radiation treatment with radical intent, with a median total dose of 66 Gy (range, 50-70) delivered with standard fractionation. The median interval between the primary radiotherapy and re-irradiation was 24 months (range, 10-168). Results. All patients completed the prescribed treatment, which was delivered in 5 fractions. The median tumor dose administered was 30 Gy (range, 25-35) prescribed to the 80% isodose line. Treatment sites were as follows: neck lymph nodes in 5 patients, paranasal sinuses in 5, oropharynx in 2, nasopharynx, and larynx, oral cavity, nasal fossa and parotid gland each in 1 patient. The median target volume treated was 58.7 cm3 (range, 8.5-211.3). Sixteen patients (94%) were evaluated for response. At a median follow-up of 7.5 months (range, 2-17), 4 patients achieved complete response (25%), 5 had partial response (31%) and 7 showed stable disease (44%). No patient showed in-field progression after re-irradiation. Grade 3 acute toxicity was noted in one patient only; no late side effect was observed during the follow-up. Conclusions. Stereotactic re-irradiation with CyberKnife is an appealing non-surgical salvage treatment for selected patients with local-regionally recurrent head and neck cancer. Copyright - Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore
Outcome After Conservative Surgery and Breast Irradiation in 5,717 Patients With Breast Cancer: Implications for Supraclavicular Nodal Irradiation
Purpose: To evaluate the outcome and predictive factors of patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy to the whole breast only, without supraclavicular nodal irradiation. Methods and Materials: A total of 5,717 patients with pT1-T4 breast cancer were treated at the University of Florence. The median age of the patient population was 55 years (range, 30-80 years). All patients were followed for a median of 6.8 years (range, 1-27 years). Adjuvant chemotherapy was recommended in 1,535 patients (26.9%). Tamoxifen was prescribed in 2,951 patients (51.6%). The patients were split into three groups according to number of positive axillary nodes (PAN): P1, negative axillary lymph nodes; P2, one to three PAN; P3, more than three PAN. Results: The P3 patients had a higher incidence of supraclavicular fossa recurrence (SFR) compared with P2 and P1 patients. However, the incidence of SFR in P3 patients was low (only 5.5%), whereas the incidence of distant metastases (DM) was 27.2%. Distant metastasis was the only independent prognostic factor for breast cancer survival. Additionally, in the subgroup of patients who developed local recurrence, DM was the most important death predictor. Conclusion: Our series suggests that isolated SFR in patients who did not receive supraclavicular radiotherapy is infrequent, as well as in those patients who have more than three PAN, and SFR seems not to influence the outcome, which depends on DM occurrence. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved