Differences in Trial and Real-world Populations in the Dutch Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Registry

__Background:__ Trials in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treatment have shown improved outcomes, including survival. However, as trial populations are selected, results may not be representative for the real-world population. The aim of this study was to assess the differences between patients treated in a clinical trial versus standard care during the course of CRPC in a real-world CRPC population. __Design, setting, and participants:__ Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Registry is a population-based, observational, retrospective registry. CRPC patients from 20 hospitals in the Netherlands have been included from 2010 to 2013. __Outcome measurements and statistical analysis:__ Baseline characteristics, systemic treatment, and overall survival were the main outcomes. Descriptive statistics, multivariate Cox regression, and multiple imputations with the Monte Carlo Markov Chain method were used. __Results and limitations:__ In total, 1524 patients were enrolled of which 203 patients had participated in trials at any time. The median follow-up period was 23 mo. Patients in the trial group were significantly younger and had less comorbidities. Docetaxel treatment was more freque

Current status of minimally invasive treatment options for localized prostate carcinoma

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the leading malignancy in men today and an increase in detected localized prostate cancers is expected in the years to come. Even though radical prostatectomy is an effective treatment, it is associated with a considerable morbidity in some cases and efforts are made to provide minimally invasive alternative treatment options with equal efficacy but fewer side effects. Methods: Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate (CSAP), brachytherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation (RITA) were evaluated after a literature review from a Medline Search (1966-1998). Furthermore, personal experience and latest data from the authors were taken into account. Results: All alternative treatments nowadays make use of sophisticated technology including the latest ultrasound devices for exact planning and monitoring of treatment, leading to increased safety compared to treatments in the 1960s and 1970s. Five-year results of CSAP show a PSA < 1 ng/ml in 60 of cases whereas brachytherapy is able to achieve PSA < 1 ng/ml in 80 of cases in a selected group. Recent outcome data come close to results of radical prostatectomy series. HIFU and RITA are promising new technologies that proved to be able to induce extensive necrosis, but the follow-up is too short to determine their definite places in the treatment of prostate cancer. Conclusion: Two alternative treatment options for localized prostate carcinoma, CSAP and brachytherapy, have been studied with a sufficient number of patients and an adequate followup. The overall results of brachytherapy are favorable when compared to CSAP and are in the same range as the outcome after radical prostatectomy. HIFU and RITA are relatively new techniques based on sophisticated technology that are very promising at present, but a longer follow-up is mandatory. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.SCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe