Hemodialysis vascular access options in pediatrics: considerations for patients and practitioners

Recent data indicate that the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in pediatric patients (age 0–19 years) has increased over the past two decades. Similarly, the prevalence of ESRD has increased threefold over the same period. Hemodialysis (HD) continues to be the most frequently utilized modality for renal replacement therapy in incident pediatric ESRD patients. The number of children on HD exceeded the sum total of those on peritoneal dialysis and those undergoing pre-emptive renal transplantation. Choosing the best vascular access option for pediatric HD patients remains challenging. Despite a national initiative for fistula first in the adult hemodialysis population, the pediatric nephrology community in the United States of America utilizes central venous catheters as the primary dialysis access for most patients. Vascular access management requires proper advance planning to assure that the best permanent access is placed, seamless communication involving a multidisciplinary team of nephrologists, nurses, surgeons, and interventional radiologists, and ongoing monitoring to ensure a long life of use. It is imperative that practitioners have a long-term vision to decrease morbidity in this unique patient population. This article reviews the various types of pediatric vascular accesses used worldwide and the benefits and disadvantages of these various forms of access

The DRIL procedure for arteriovenous access ischemic steal : a controversial approach

The DRIL procedure first described in 1988 has long been considered the preferred treatment for arteriovenous access ischemic steal (AVAIS). At the time it was a brilliant concept and breakthrough. In the last decade, the DRIL procedure has become less used. With the increasing age of the dialysis population, patients developing AVAIS are more likely to be elderly with advanced peripheral arterial disease, making the distal revascularization anastomosis difficult and risky if not impossible to perform. In addition, the distal ligation of the main artery to the arm is something most surgeons are reluctant to do. The occlusion of the arterial bypass over time is not uncommon with recurrence of hand ischemia. The multistep DRIL procedure requires general anesthesia and the need to harvest the saphenous vein for the bypass, add to the surgical risk in patients with multiple co-morbidities. For these reasons, some surgeons prefer to do only the DR (distal re-vascularization) portion of the procedure omitting the IL (interval ligation). Increasing the bypass distance from the original anastomosis, makes this modification similar to the less invasive proximal arterial inflow (PAI) procedure. Conclusions: Because of changes in the patient population clinical presentation, most notably forearm atherosclerosis and with new technologies, this editorial addresses the current validity of the DRIL procedure as a safe option in treating AVAIS

Avaliação da perviedade precoce das fístulas arteriovenosas para hemodiálise Evaluation of early patency of the arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis

CONTEXTO: A insuficiência renal crônica é uma doença de alta prevalência e morbidade, o que determina queda da qualidade de vida. Pacientes em hemodiálise necessitam de um acesso vascular que permita a conexão da circulação do paciente ao circuito externo de hemodiálise. Dentre os acessos disponíveis, as fístulas arteriovenosas (FAV) são as que mais se aproximam do acesso ideal. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a perviedade precoce das FAV, identificando os fatores relacionados ao insucesso destas. MÉTODOS: Foram acompanhados todos os pacientes submetidos à confecção das FAV no Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São Paulo, no período de agosto de 2008 a janeiro de 2009, avaliando-se a perviedade destas no 1º, 10º e 30º pós-operatório. Foram realizadas 31 FAV no período, apresentando-se média de idade de 63,06 anos, sendo 18 pacientes do sexo masculino e 13 do feminino. RESULTADOS: Vinte e seis FAV foram distais, todas radiocefálicas; quatro foram proximais, das quais duas braquiocefálicas e duas braquiobasílicas superficializadas; uma FAV confeccionada com alça de politetrafluoretileno (PTFE) fêmoro-femoral esquerda. A taxa de perviedade no primeiro mês foi de 71% dos casos. O uso de cateteres venosos centrais apresentou-se como fator de risco para oclusão da FAV (p=0,01). As FAV continuam sendo o acesso vascular para hemodiálise mais aceito e mais seguro. A indicação precoce para confecção das FAV é de fundamental importância, evitando-se, assim, o uso de cateteres e suas complicações. CONCLUSÕES: A perviedade precoce encontrada neste estudo é semelhante à da literatura, e o uso prévio de cateteres é o fator de risco mais significativo para oclusão precoce desta.<br>BACKGROUND: Chronic renal failure is a disease of high prevalence and high morbidity, which impairs the patients' quality of life. Patients on hemodialysis need a vascular access for connection with the hemodialysis equipment. Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are the best option for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early patency of AVFs and to identify the causes of their failure. METHODS: All patients AVF underwent operations for dialysis from August, 2008 to January, 2009. The AVF patency was evaluated on the 1st, 10th and 30th postoperative days. Thirty-one operations for AVF were performed in our hospital in the period; 18 patients were males and the mean age was 63.03 years. RESULTS: Twenty-six AVF were distal, all radial-cephalic; four were proximal, out of which two were brachiocephalic and two were brachiobasilic; one AVF was a femoral-femoral loop PTFE graft. The patency rate in the first month was of 71%. The use of central venous catheters was a risk factor for AVF occlusion (p=0.01). AVF remains the most accepted and safe vascular access. Early performance of the AVF is very important to avoid the complications resulting from long-term use of central venous catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Data regarding early patency found in this study were similar to those found in literature, and the use of central venous catheters before performing AVF is an important risk factor for occlusion