Autologous serum skin test reactions in chronic spontaneous urticaria differ from heterologous cell reactions

Background: Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is due to mast cell (MC)-activating autoantibodies, which are screened for by the autologous serum skin test (ASST) and basophil tests (BTs). Many CSU patients are positive in only one of these tests. How often this occurs and why is currently unknown. Objectives: To characterize the prevalence of mismatched ASST and BTs in CSU patients, and to investigate possible reasons for these mismatches. Methods: We determined the rates of ASST+/BT- and ASST-/BT+ mismatches in published CSU studies. We assessed sera from 48 CSU patients by ASST, two BTs (basophil histamine release assay, BHRA; basophil activation test, BAT), a MC histamine release assay (MCHRA) and by ex vivo skin microdialysis (SMD). Results: The ASST/BT mismatch rate in published CSU studies was 31% (ASST+/BT-: 22%, ASST-/BT+: 9%). In our patients, the ASST/BHRA and ASST/BAT mismatch rate was 35.4% (ASST+/BHRA-: 18.8% and ASST-/BHRA+: 16.7%) and 31.3% (ASST+/BAT-: 6.3% and ASST-/BAT+: 25.0%), respectively, and the two BTs were significantly correlated (P = 0.0002). The use of heterologous MCs, in vitro and in situ, instead of basophils produced similar results (MCHRA mismatch: 47.9%, ASST+/MCHRA-: 18.8%, ASST-/MCHRA+: 29.2%; SMD mismatch: 40.0%, ASST+/SMD-: 10.0% and ASST-/SMD+: 30.0%), and the MCHRA was highly correlated with SMD results (P = 0.0002). Conclusions: The ASST and BTs show divergent results in a third of CSU patients. Mismatches cannot be explained by the choice of basophil assay, the type of heterologous cells exposed to CSU serum in vitro (basophils vs. mast cells), nor the experimental setting of heterologous skin mast cells (in vitro vs. in situ). Thus, serum-induced whealing, in CSU patients, seems to involve autologous skin signals modulating MC degranulation

What Basophil Testing Tells Us About CSU Patients – Results of the CORSA Study

Basophil testing is the most effective single approach for diagnosing type-IIb autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (TIIbaiCSU). A positive basophil test has been linked to long disease duration, higher disease activity, a poor response to antihistamines and omalizumab, and a better response to cyclosporine and fenebrutinib. As of now it is unclear what other features are connected to a positive basophil test in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). We aimed to identify features of basophil test-positive CSU patients. We performed a cross-sectional study of 85 CSU patients. Basophil testing was done with the basophil activation test (BAT) and the basophil histamine release assay (BHRA). Data were analysed using SPSS: Student's t-test, Chi-square test, Odds Ratio, Spearman's correlation test. Of 85 CSU patients, 44% and 28% tested positive with the BAT and BHRA, respectively. These patients showed higher disease activity and impact, lower levels of disease control and total serum IgE, as well as higher rates of having a positive autologous serum skin test (ASST), angioedema, nocturnal symptoms, symptoms for >5 days/week, and thyroid autoantibodies. The ASST, by itself, was not a good predictor of basophil test results, but it predicted a positive basophil test in up to 100% of cases when combined with angioedema, thyroid autoantibodies or low IgE. In conclusion, a positive basophil test is linked to known features of TIIbaiCSU and novel characteristics including nocturnal symptoms. Further studies on basophil test-positive and -negative CSU patients can help to better understand CSU endotypes and to develop better management approaches

Intradermal substance P as a challenge agent in healthy individuals

Pharmacological challenge models are deployed to evaluate drug effects during clinical development. Intradermal injection of Substance P (SP) neuropeptide, a potential challenge agent for investigating local mediators, is associated with wheal and flare response mediated by the MRGPRX2 receptor. Although dose-dependent data on SP effects exist, full characterization and information on potential carryover effect after repeated challenge are lacking. This open-label, two-part, prospective enabling study of SP intradermal challenge in healthy participants aimed to understand and distinguish between wheal and flare responses following various SP doses. Part 1 included one challenge visit to determine optimum SP dose range for evaluation in part 2, which determined variability in 20 participants and used intradermal microdialysis (IDM) for SP-challenged skin sampling. At 5, 15, 50, and 150 pmol doses, respectively, posterior median area under the curve (AUC; AUC0-2h ) was 4090.4, 5881.2, 8846.8, and 9212.8 mm2 /min, for wheal response, and 12020.9, 38154.3, 65470.6, and 67404.4 mm2 /min for flare response (SP-challenge visit 2). When the challenge was repeated ~2 weeks later, no carryover effect was observed. IDM histamine levels were relatively low, resulting in low confidence in the data to define temporal characteristics for histamine release following SP challenge. No safety concerns were identified using SP. Wheal and flare responses following intradermal SP challenge were dose-dependent and different. The results indicate that this challenge model is fit-for-purpose in future first-in-human studies and further assessment of novel drugs targeting dermal inflammatory disease responses, such as chronic spontaneous urticaria, chronic inducible urticaria, and pseudo-allergic reactions.Drug Delivery Technolog

Investigating the Early Events after Skin-Barrier Disruption Using Microdialysis—A Human Ex Vivo Skin Model

Skin-barrier restoration following abrasive trauma is facilitated by mediator release from skin-resident cells, a process that has been investigated primarily in mice or simplified human systems with previous studies focusing on a limited number of biomarkers. Here, we demonstrate how early events caused by skin-barrier disruption can be studied in a human ex vivo skin model. Ten relevant biomarkers were recovered from the interstitial fluid by skin microdialysis with subsequent sample analysis using a multiplex platform. As a control, the biomarker profiles obtained from microdialysis sampling were compared to profiles of skin biopsy homogenates. We found that nine (GM-CSF, CXCL1/GROα, CXCL8/IL-8 CXCL10/IP-10, IL-1α, IL-6, MIF, TNF-α, and VEGF) of the 10 biomarkers were significantly upregulated in response to abrasive trauma. Only dialysate levels of CCL27/CTACK were unaffected by skin abrasion. Biomarker levels in the homogenates corresponded to dialysate levels for CCL27/CTACK, CXCL1/GROα, CXCL8/IL-8, and IL-6. However, IL-1α showed an inverse trend in response to trauma, and biopsy levels of MIF were unchanged. GM-CSF, CXCL10/IP-10, TNF-α, and VEGF were not detected in the biopsy homogenates. Our results suggest that the human ex vivo skin model is a reliable approach to study early events after disruption of the skin barrier

The skin reservoir model:A tool for evaluating microdialysis sampling of large biomarkers from human skin

Microdialysis is a well-established technique for sampling of small molecules from the human skin, but larger molecules are more difficult to recover. Consequently, sampling feasibility must be evaluated before microdialysis is used in vivo. This report presents a tool for estimating the recovery of large biomarkers from human skin by microdialysis, using previously frozen human skin specimens as reservoirs for biomarker reference solutions. Recovery of the following 17 biomarkers was assessed: CCL27/CTACK, CXCL1/GROα, CXCL7/NAP-2, CXCL10/IP-10, EGF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, IL-22, IL-23, MIF, TNF-α, TSLP and VEGF. The relative skin recoveries of 13/17 biomarkers were successfully determined in the range 4.0–18.4%. Sampling in the skin reservoir model was not associated with probe leakage, as fluid recovery was stable, at between 80% and 110%. Furthermore, the skin reservoir model enabled studies and optimization of different parameters known to affect biomarker recovery, including flow rate and perfusate composition

Autologous serum skin test reactions in chronic spontaneous urticaria differ from heterologous cell reactions

Background: Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is due to mast cell (MC)-activating autoantibodies, which are screened for by the autologous serum skin test (ASST) and basophil tests (BTs). Many CSU patients are positive in only one of these tests. How often this occurs and why is currently unknown. Objectives: To characterize the prevalence of mismatched ASST and BTs in CSU patients, and to investigate possible reasons for these mismatches. Methods: We determined the rates of ASST+/BT- and ASST-/BT+ mismatches in published CSU studies. We assessed sera from 48 CSU patients by ASST, two BTs (basophil histamine release assay, BHRA; basophil activation test, BAT), a MC histamine release assay (MCHRA) and by ex vivo skin microdialysis (SMD). Results: The ASST/BT mismatch rate in published CSU studies was 31% (ASST+/BT-: 22%, ASST-/BT+: 9%). In our patients, the ASST/BHRA and ASST/BAT mismatch rate was 35.4% (ASST+/BHRA-: 18.8% and ASST-/BHRA+: 16.7%) and 31.3% (ASST+/BAT-: 6.3% and ASST-/BAT+: 25.0%), respectively, and the two BTs were significantly correlated (P = 0.0002). The use of heterologous MCs, in vitro and in situ, instead of basophils produced similar results (MCHRA mismatch: 47.9%, ASST+/MCHRA-: 18.8%, ASST-/MCHRA+: 29.2%; SMD mismatch: 40.0%, ASST+/SMD-: 10.0% and ASST-/SMD+: 30.0%), and the MCHRA was highly correlated with SMD results (P = 0.0002). Conclusions: The ASST and BTs show divergent results in a third of CSU patients. Mismatches cannot be explained by the choice of basophil assay, the type of heterologous cells exposed to CSU serum in vitro (basophils vs. mast cells), nor the experimental setting of heterologous skin mast cells (in vitro vs. in situ). Thus, serum-induced whealing, in CSU patients, seems to involve autologous skin signals modulating MC degranulation