Care of HIV-Infected Pregnant Women in Maternal–Fetal Medicine Programs

Objective: To survey the evolution over the past decade of attitudes and practices of obstetricians in maternal–fetal medicine fellowship programs regarding the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women. Methods: Directors of all 65 approved maternal–fetal medicine training programs were sent questionnaires, responses to which were to reflect the consensus among members of their faculties. Programs were stratified based upon the number of HIV-infected pregnant patients cared for in the previous year. Results: Responses reflect experience with over 1000 infected pregnantwomen per year, nearly one-quarter with advanced disease. Combination antiretroviral therapy was prescribed by all respondents, universally in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. A three-drug regimen (often containing a protease inhibitor) was used more often by those who treated at least 20 HIV-infected pregnant patients per year than by those programs seeing a lower number of patients (80 vs 59%).Despite the known and unknown risks of the use of antiretrovirals during pregnancy, only half of all responding programs report adverse events to the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry; reporting was more common among the institutions seeing a higher number of patients (61 vs 45%). Seventy-eight percent of higher volume programs enroll their patients in clinical studies, usually multicenter, versus 35% of lower volume programs. Conclusions: Care for HIV² pregnant women has dramatically changed over the past decade. Antiretroviral therapy is now universally prescribed by physicians involved in maternal–fetal medicine training programs. Given limited experience with these agents in the setting of pregnancy, it is essential for maternal–fetal medicine practitioners to actively report on adverse events and participate in clinical trials

Care of HIV-infected pregnant women in maternal-fetal medicine programs

Objective: To survey the evolution over the past decade of attitudes and practices of obstetricians in maternalfetal medicine fellowship programs regarding the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women. Methods: Directors of all 65 approved maternal-fetal medicine training programs were sent questionnaires, responses to which were to reflect the consensus among members of their faculties. Programs were stratified based upon the number of HIV-infected pregnant patients cared for in the previous year. Results: Responses reflect experience with over 1000 infected pregnant women per year, nearly one-quarter with advanced disease. Combination antiretroviral therapy was prescribed by all respondents, universally in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. A three-drug regimen (often containing a protease inhibitor) was used more often by those who treated at least 20 HIV-infected pregnant patients per year than by those programs seeing a lower number of patients (80 vs 59%). Despite the known and unknown risks of the use of antiretrovirals during pregnancy, only half of all responding programs report adverse events to the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry; reporting was more common among the institutions seeing a higher number of patients (61 vs 45%). Seventy-eight percent of higher volume programs enroll their patients in clinical studies, usually multicenter, versus 35% of lower volume programs. Conclusions: Care for HIV+ pregnant women has dramatically changed over the past decade. Antiretroviral therapy is now universally prescribed by physicians involved in maternal-fetal medicine training programs. Given limited experience with these agents in the setting of pregnancy, it is essential for maternal-fetal medicine practitioners to actively report on adverse events and participate in clinical trials

Management and therapy of human immunodeficiency virus-infected pregnancies in maternal-fetal medicine fellowship training programs

Objective: To determine attitudes and practices of obstetricians in maternal-fetal medicine fellowship programs regarding the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and the use of zidovudine during pregnancy. Methods: We sent a questionnaire to the directors of all 78 approved maternal-fetal medicine fellowship programs. The responses, reflecting the consensus of the staffs of each program, were obtained and tabulated. Results: Although their programs annually provide care for more than 2100 pregnant women infected with HIV, less than 25% of all maternal-fetal medicine fellowship directors reported that their patients participate in multicenter studies of HIV infection complicating pregnancy. Nearly two-thirds of the infected women are excluded from such multicenter studies. More than 70% of all program directors believe that zidovudine should be offered to symptomatic pregnant women infected with HIV; one-half question whether zidovudine poses short-term fetal risks. Nevertheless, nearly half of all HIV-infected pregnant women they manage are excluded from trials of zidovudine therapy during pregnancy. Conclusions: Many HIV-infected pregnant women who receive care in clinics of maternal-fetal medicine fellowship programs are excluded from multicenter studies. Consideration should be given to creating a national registry for this important, currently unreported, clinical resource. © 1992 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Gestational angiogenic biomarker patterns in high risk preeclampsia groups

OBJECTIVE: Several conditions are associated with increased preeclampsia (PE) risk. Whether altered maternal angiogenic factor levels contribute to risk in these conditions is unknown. Our objective was to compare angiogenic biomarker patterns in high-risk pregnancies and low-risk controls. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a 2-center observational study of angiogenic biomarkers in high-risk women. A total of 156 pregnant women with a PE risk factor and 59 low-risk controls were studied. Serial maternal serum samples were collected during 3 gestational windows: 23-27 weeks, 28-31 weeks, and 32-35 weeks. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1), soluble endoglin (sEng), and placental growth factor (PlGF) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Geometric mean angiogenic biomarker levels and angiogenic ratio (sFlt1 + sEng):PlGF were compared with low-risk controls for each risk group, at each gestational window. RESULTS: Gestational biomarker patterns differed in PE risk groups as compared with low-risk controls. Women with multiple gestations had markedly higher sFlt1 and sEng at all gestational windows. Women with prior PE had higher sFlt1 and angiogenic ratio, and lower PlGF, from 28 weeks onward. Women with chronic hypertension had significantly higher angiogenic ratio for all 3 gestational windows, but differences disappeared when women with PE were excluded. Obese and nulliparous women had significantly lower PlGF, but no differences in the angiogenic ratio. CONCLUSION: High-risk groups have altered angiogenic biomarker patterns compared with controls, suggesting that altered production or metabolism of these factors may contribute to PE risk, particularly in women with multiple gestations and prior PE

Angiogenic biomarkers for prediction of early preeclampsia onset in high-risk women

Objective: Chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes mellitus, history of prior preeclampsia and obese nulliparity are maternal conditions associated with increased preeclampsia risk. Whether altered maternal angiogenic factor levels allow for prediction of pending disease is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate angiogenic factors for early preeclampsia prediction in high-risk women. Methods: Serial serum specimens were collected from 157 women at high preeclampsia risk and 50 low-risk controls between 23 and 36 weeks gestation in 3 windows (23-27.6, 28-31.6, and 32-35.6 weeks) in a two-center observational cohort. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1), placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble endoglin (sEng) were measured by ELISA. Results: Multivariate parsimonious logistic regression analyses using backward elimination for prediction of early-preeclampsia (diagnosed\u3c34 weeks) found the best-fitting model included the predictors (1) sFlt1 measured in the second window (28-31.6 weeks) with AUC 0.85, sensitivity 67% and specificity 96% and (2) sFlt1 measured in the first window (23-27.6 weeks) and sEng change between first and second window with AUC 0.91, sensitivity 86% and specificity 96%. Conclusions: Two-stage sampling screening protocol utilizing sFlt1 and sEng is promising for prediction of preeclampsia diagnosed before 34 weeks. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. © 2014 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted