Upper airway imaging in sleep-disordered breathing.

peer reviewedOur understanding of sleep-disordered breathing has evolved considerably over the past three decades, and clinical techniques of evaluation have progressed tremendously. Myriad imaging techniques are now available for the physician to approach the dynamic features resulting in turbulent airflow, upper airway narrowing or collapse at different levels. Controversy exists in the choice of investigations, probably because the best evaluation should be a combination of different techniques. Physical, radiographic, endoscopic and acoustic evaluations could be integrated to understand the degree and the levels of airway reduction and/or obstruction in a given patient. This review focuses on cost-effective and easily implemented techniques in daily practice, allowing quality assessment of the dynamic anatomy of sleep-disordered breathing: cephalometry, (sleep-)endoscopy and acoustic reflectometry of the upper airway

Validation of mandibular movements analysis to measure sleep in adults with sleep complaints by comparison with actigraphy and polysomnography.

Objective: In adults with sleep complaints, we assessed the software of automatic analysis of mandibular movements to identify sleep and wake states by confrontation with the polysomnography (PSG) and the Actigraphe (ACTG). Methods: Simultaneous and synchronized in-lab PSG, ACTG, and JAWAC were carried out in 100 patients with a sleep complaint. Epoch by epoch analysis was realized to assess the ability to sleep-wake distinction. Sleep parameters as measured by the three devices were compared. These included three regularly reported parameters: total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO). Also, two supplementary parameters, wake during sleep period (WDSP) and latency to arising (LTA) were added to measure separately the quiet wakefulness states. Results: The epoch by epoch analysis showed that the JAWAC, as compared to ACTG, classified sleep and wake states with greater specificity, while the overall accuracy and sensitivity of the two devices were comparable. The sleep parameters analysis showed that for the JAWAC estimates, the differences in TST, SOL, and LTA values were not statistically significant. However, WDSP and subsequently WASO were slightly underestimated. In contrast, the dissimilarities between ACTG estimates and PSG measurements of all the above sleep parameters were statistically significant; TST was overestimated whilst SOL, LTA, WDSP, and WASO were underestimated. Conclusions: This study indicated that, besides its ability to reliably estimate TST, the JAWAC based on mandibular movements analysis was able, in adults with sleep complaints, to overcome the important problem of the recognition of the state of quiet wakefulness

Validation of midsagittal jaw movements to measure sleep in healthy adults by comparison with actigraphy and polysomnography.

OBJECTIVE: In a device based on midsagittal jaw movements analysis, we assessed a sleep-wake automatic detector as an objective method to measure sleep in healthy adults by comparison with wrist actigraphy against polysomnography (PSG). METHODS: Simultaneous and synchronized in-lab PSG, wrist actigraphy and jaw movements were carried out in 38 healthy participants. Epoch by epoch analysis was realized to assess the ability to sleep-wake distinction. Sleep parameters as measured by the three devices were compared. This included three regularly reported parameters: total sleep time, sleep onset latency, and wake after sleep onset. Also, two supplementary parameters, wake during sleep period and latency time, were added to measure quiet wakefulness state. RESULTS: The jaw movements showed sensitivity level equal to actigraphy 96% and higher specificity level (64% and 48% respectively). The level of agreement between the two devices was high (87%). The analysis of their disagreement by discrepant resolution analysis used PSG as resolver revealed that jaw movements was right (58.9%) more often than actigraphy (41%). In sleep parameters comparison, the coefficient correlation of jaw movements was higher than actigraphy in all parameters. Moreover, its ability to distinct sleep-wake state allowed for a more effective estimation of the parameters that measured the quiet wakefulness state. CONCLUSIONS: Midsagittal jaw movements analysis is a reliable method to measure sleep. In healthy adults, this device proved to be superior to actigraphy in terms of estimation of all sleep parameters and distinction of sleep-wake status

Validation des mouvements de la mandibule pour mesurer le sommeil par comparaison directe à la polysomnographie et à l’actimetrie

peer reviewe

Validation of midsagittal jaw movements to measure sleep in healthy adults by comparison with actigraphy and polysomnography

OBJECTIVE: In a device based on midsagittal jaw movements analysis, we assessed a sleep-wake automatic detector as an objective method to measure sleep in healthy adults by comparison with wrist actigraphy against polysomnography (PSG). METHODS: Simultaneous and synchronized in-lab PSG, wrist actigraphy and jaw movements were carried out in 38 healthy participants. Epoch by epoch analysis was realized to assess the ability to sleep-wake distinction. Sleep parameters as measured by the three devices were compared. This included three regularly reported parameters: total sleep time, sleep onset latency, and wake after sleep onset. Also, two supplementary parameters, wake during sleep period and latency time, were added to measure quiet wakefulness state. RESULTS: The jaw movements showed sensitivity level equal to actigraphy 96% and higher specificity level (64% and 48% respectively). The level of agreement between the two devices was high (87%). The analysis of their disagreement by discrepant resolution analysis used PSG as resolver revealed that jaw movements was right (58.9%) more often than actigraphy (41%). In sleep parameters comparison, the coefficient correlation of jaw movements was higher than actigraphy in all parameters. Moreover, its ability to distinct sleep-wake state allowed for a more effective estimation of the parameters that measured the quiet wakefulness state. CONCLUSIONS: Midsagittal jaw movements analysis is a reliable method to measure sleep. In healthy adults, this device proved to be superior to actigraphy in terms of estimation of all sleep parameters and distinction of sleep-wake status