5 research outputs found
Attitudes and practices of Irish hospital-based physicians towards hand hygiene and handrubbing using alcohol-based hand rubs, a comparison between 2007 and 2015.
Background: Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of infection prevention and control practices,
and reduces healthcare-associated infections significantly. However, international
evidence suggests that medical doctors demonstrate poor compliance.
Aim: To explore and compare practices and attitudes towards hand hygiene, particularly
hand rubbing using alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR), among hospital-based physicians in
Ireland between 2007 and 2015.
Methods: In 2007, a random sample of doctors in a large teaching hospital was invited to
complete a postal survey using a validated questionnaire. In 2015, the study was replicated
among all doctors employed in a university hospital group, including the setting of
the original study, using an online survey. Data were analysed using SPSS and Survey
Monkey.
Findings: Predominately positive and improving attitudes and practices were found, with
86% of doctors compliant with hand hygiene before patient contact in 2015, compared
with 58% in 2007. Ninety-one percent of doctors were compliant after patient contact in
2015, compared with 76% in 2007. In 2015, only 39% of respondents reported that they
‘almost always’ used ABHR for hand hygiene. However, this represents 13.5% more than in
2007. Stated barriers to use of ABHR included dermatological issues, poor acceptance,
tolerance and poor availability of ABHR products.
Conclusion: Greater awareness of hand hygiene guidelines and greater governance appear
to have had a positive impact on practice. However, despite this, practice remains suboptimal
and there is scope for substantial improvement. Continued and sustained efforts
are required in order to build on progress achieved since the World Health Organization
hand hygiene guidelines were published in 2009
Combined education and skin antisepsis intervention for persistently high blood-culture contamination rates in neonatal intensive care
Contaminated blood cultures represent challenges regarding diagnosis, duration of hospitalization,
antimicrobial use, pharmacy and laboratory costs. Facing problematic
neonatal blood culture contamination (3.8%), we instigated a successful intervention
combining skin antisepsis using sterile applicators with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70%
isopropanol prior to phlebotomy (replacing 70% isopropanol) and staff education. In the six
months prior to intervention, 364 neonatal peripheral blood samples were collected.
Fourteen (3.8%) were contaminated. In the post-intervention six months, 314 samples
were collected. Three (0.96%) were contaminated, representing significant improvement
(Fisher’s exact test: P= 0.0259). No dermatological sequelae were observed. The
improvement has been sustained
The first occurence of a CTX-M ESBL-producing Escherichia coli outbreak mediated by mother to neonate transmission in an Irish neonatal intensive care unit.
Background: Escherichia coli (E. coli) comprise part of the normal vaginal microflora. Transfer from mother to
neonate can occur during delivery resulting, sometimes, in neonatal bacterial disease. Here, we aim to report the
first outbreak of CTX-M ESBL-producing E. coli with evidence of mother-to-neonate transmission in an Irish neonatal
intensive care unit (NICU) followed by patient-to-patient transmission.
Methods: Investigation including molecular typing was conducted. Infection was defined by clinical and laboratory
criteria and requirement for antimicrobial therapy with or without positive blood cultures. Colonisation was
determined by isolation without relevant symptoms or indicators of infection.
Results: Index case was an 8-day-old baby born at 34 weeks gestation who developed ESBL-producing E. coli
infections at multiple body sites. Screening confirmed their mother as colonised with ESBL-producing E. coli. Five
other neonates, in the NICU simultaneously with the index case, also tested positive. Of these, four were colonised
while one neonate developed sepsis, requiring antimicrobial therapy. The second infected neonate’s mother was
also colonised by ESBL-producing E. coli. Isolates from all eight positive patients (6 neonates, 2 mothers) were
compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Two distinct ESBL-producing strains were implicated, with
evidence of transmission between mothers and neonates for both strains. All isolates were confirmed as CTX-M
ESBL-producers. There were no deaths associated with the outbreak.
Conclusions: Resources were directed towards control interventions focused on hand hygiene and antimicrobial
stewardship, which ultimately proved successful. Since this incident, all neonates admitted to the NICU have been
screened for ESBL-producers and expectant mothers are screened at their first antenatal appointment. To date,
there have been no further outbreaks
An Irish outbreak of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-1 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: increasing but unrecognised prevalence
Background
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) can cause healthcare–associated infections with high mortality rates. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) is amongst the most recently discovered carbapenemases.
Aim
To report the first outbreak of NDM-1 CPE in Ireland, including microbiological and epidemiological characteristics, and assessing the impact of infection prevention and control measures.
Methods
Retrospective microbiological and epidemiological review. Cases were defined as patients with a CPE positive culture. Contacts were designated as roommates or ward mates.
Findings
This outbreak involved ten patients, with a median age of 71 years (range 45-90 years), located in three separate but affiliated healthcare facilities. One patient was infected (the index case); the nine others were colonised. Nine NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, a NDM-1-producing Escherichia coli and a K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacter cloacae were detected between week 24 2014 and week 37 2014. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis demonstrated similarity. NDM-1 positive isolates were meropenem resistant with MICs ranging from 12 to 32 μg/ml. All were tigecycline susceptible (MICs ≤1 μg/ml). One isolate was colistin resistant (MIC 4.0 μg/ml; mcr-1 gene not detected). In 2015, four further NDM-1 isolates were detected.
Conclusions
The successful management of this outbreak was achieved via the prompt implementation of enhanced infection prevention and control practices to prevent transmission. These patients did not have a history of travel outside of Ireland, but a number had frequent hospitalisations in Ireland, raising concerns regarding the possibility of increasing but unrecognised prevalence of NDM-1 and potential decline in value of travel history a marker of colonisation risk