The Effect of Impact Location on Force Transmission to the Modular Junctions of Dual-Taper Modular Hip Implants.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect that off-axis impaction has on stability of dual-taper modular implants as measured by forces delivered to and transmitted through the head-neck and neck-stem tapers, respectively. METHODS: One hundred forty-four impact tests were performed using 6 different directions: one on-axis and five 10° off-axes. Four different simulations were performed measuring the head-neck only and 3 different neck angulations: 0°, 8°, and 15°. A drop tower impactor delivered both on- and off-axis impaction from a constant height. Load cells positioned in the drop mass and at the head-neck (HN) or neck-stem (NS) junction measured the impact and joint forces, respectively. RESULTS: Impact force of the hammer on the head ranged from 3800-4500 N. Greatest impact force delivered to the head was typically with axial impact. However, greatest force transmission to the neck-stem junction was not necessarily with axial impacts. There was limited variability in the force measured at the NS junction for all impaction directions seen in the 8° neck, whereas the 15° neck had greater forces transmitted to the NS junction with off-axes impactions directed in the proximal and posterior-proximal directions. CONCLUSION: The location of the impact significantly influences the force transmitted to the head-neck and neck-stem junctions in dual-taper modular hip implants. Although axial impacts proved superior to off-axis impacts for the straight 0° neck, greater force transmission with off-axis impacts for the angled necks suggests that off-axis impacts may potentially compromise the stability of dual-taper components

The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dual-taper modular implants following impaction forces delivered at varying locations as measured by the distraction forces required to disassemble the components. METHODS: Distraction of the head-neck and neck-stem (NS) tapers of dual-taper modular implants with 0°, 8°, and 15° neck angles were measured utilizing a custom-made distraction fixture attached to a servohydraulic materials test machine. Distraction was measured after hand pressing the components as well as following a simulated firm hammer blow impaction. Impacts to the 0°, 8°, 15° necks were directed axially in line with the neck, 10° anterior, and 10° proximal to the axis of the neck, respectively. RESULTS: Impaction increased the range of NS component distraction forces when compared to hand pressed components (1125-1743 N vs 248-302 N, respectively). Off-axis impacts resulted in significantly reduced mean (±95% confidence interval) distraction forces (8° neck, 1125 ± 117 N; 15° neck, 1212 ± 73 N), which were up to 35% lower than the mean distraction force for axial impacts to the 0° neck (1743 ± 138 N). CONCLUSIONS: Direction of impaction influences stability of the modular interface. The greatest stability was achieved with impaction directed in line with the longitudinal axis of the taper junction. Off-axis impaction of the 8° and 15° neck led to significantly reduced stability at the NS. Improving stability of dual-taper modular hip prostheses with appropriately directed impaction may help to minimize micromotion, component settling, fretting corrosion, and subsequent failure

Dual-taper modular hip implant: Investigation of 3-dimensional surface scans for component contact, shape, and fit.

Background: The etiology of wear particle generation and subsequent corrosion in modular total hip arthroplasty implants likely begins with mechanical fretting. The purpose of this study was to determine geometric features of the male and female taper surfaces that drive stability within the neck-stem junction. Methods: Eighteen modular hip components received 3-dimensional surface scans to examine the neck-stem taper junction using an optical scanner. The normal distance between the surfaces of the neck taper as seated in the stem slot was measured and produced a color map of the contact proximity. Contour plots identified surface shape variation and contact. Angle measurements and neck seated depth were analyzed by regression. Results: The typical features observed were (1) a vertical line of contact at one end of the transition from the flat surface to the radius surface; (2) a vertical line of contact in the radius surface just past the centerline; (3) a concavity along the flat surface between the neck and stem components; and (4) one of the neck flat surfaces was closer to its mating surface on the stem. The seated depth of the neck was dependent on the taper angles in the flat section of the neck (R Conclusions: The shape of the neck and stem tapers deviate from ideal design dimensions, contributing to relative motions between the neck and stem. While these processes are not proven to directly cause implant failure, they may place the implants at higher risk for failure

The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dual-taper modular implants following impaction forces delivered at varying locations as measured by the distraction forces required to disassemble the components. Methods: Distraction of the head-neck and neck-stem (NS) tapers of dual-taper modular implants with 0°, 8°, and 15° neck angles were measured utilizing a custom-made distraction fixture attached to a servohydraulic materials test machine. Distraction was measured after hand pressing the components as well as following a simulated firm hammer blow impaction. Impacts to the 0°, 8°, 15° necks were directed axially in line with the neck, 10° anterior, and 10° proximal to the axis of the neck, respectively. Results: Impaction increased the range of NS component distraction forces when compared to hand pressed components (1125-1743 N vs 248-302 N, respectively). Off-axis impacts resulted in significantly reduced mean (±95% confidence interval) distraction forces (8° neck, 1125 ± 117 N; 15° neck, 1212 ± 73 N), which were up to 35% lower than the mean distraction force for axial impacts to the 0° neck (1743 ± 138 N). Conclusions: Direction of impaction influences stability of the modular interface. The greatest stability was achieved with impaction directed in line with the longitudinal axis of the taper junction. Off-axis impaction of the 8° and 15° neck led to significantly reduced stability at the NS. Improving stability of dual-taper modular hip prostheses with appropriately directed impaction may help to minimize micromotion, component settling, fretting corrosion, and subsequent failure

Dual-taper modular hip implant: Investigation of 3-dimensional surface scans for component contact, shape, and fit

Background: The etiology of wear particle generation and subsequent corrosion in modular total hip arthroplasty implants likely begins with mechanical fretting. The purpose of this study was to determine geometric features of the male and female taper surfaces that drive stability within the neck-stem junction. Methods: Eighteen modular hip components received 3-dimensional surface scans to examine the neck-stem taper junction using an optical scanner. The normal distance between the surfaces of the neck taper as seated in the stem slot was measured and produced a color map of the contact proximity. Contour plots identified surface shape variation and contact. Angle measurements and neck seated depth were analyzed by regression. Results: The typical features observed were (1) a vertical line of contact at one end of the transition from the flat surface to the radius surface; (2) a vertical line of contact in the radius surface just past the centerline; (3) a concavity along the flat surface between the neck and stem components; and (4) one of the neck flat surfaces was closer to its mating surface on the stem. The seated depth of the neck was dependent on the taper angles in the flat section of the neck (R2 = 0.5000, P = .0332). Conclusions: The shape of the neck and stem tapers deviate from ideal design dimensions, contributing to relative motions between the neck and stem. While these processes are not proven to directly cause implant failure, they may place the implants at higher risk for failure. Keywords: Total hip arthroplasty (THA), Corrosion, Modular, Implants, Dual modula