Interferon β-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis: four-year extension of the European IFNβ-1a Dose-C omparison Study

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease requiring long-term monitoring of treatment. Objective: To assess the four-year clinical efficacy of intramuscular (IM) IFNb-1a in patients with relapsing MS from the European IFNb-1a Dose-C omparison Study. Methods: Patients who completed 36 months of treatment (Part 1) of the European IFNb-1a Dose-C omparison Study were given the option to continue double-blind treatment with IFNb-1a 30 mcg or 60 mcg IM once weekly (Part 2). Analyses of 48-month data were performed on sustained disability progression, relapses, and neutralizing antibody (NA b) formation. Results: O f 608/802 subjects who completed 36 months of treatment, 493 subjects continued treatment and 446 completed 48 months of treatment and follow-up. IFNb-1a 30 mcg and 60 mcg IM once weekly were equally effective for up to 48 months. There were no significant differences between doses over 48 months on any of the clinical endpoints, including rate of disability progression, cumulative percentage of patients who progressed (48 and 43, respectively), and annual relapse rates; relapses tended to decrease over 48 months. The incidence of patients who were positive for NAbs at any time during the study was low in both treatment groups. Conclusion: C ompared with 60-mcg IM IFNb-1a once weekly, a dose of 30 mcg IM IFNb-1a once weekly maintains the same clinical efficacy over four years

Double-blind randomized multicenter dose-comparison study of interferon-beta-1a (AVONEX):rationale, design and baseline data

We describe the rationale and design of a double-blind, randomized multicenter, dose-comparison study of interferon-beta-Ia (IFN-beta -Ia: AVONEX(R) in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). The study is expected to provide quantitative insights on the dose range for optimal clinical benefits in MS. The study involves 802 patients in 10 European countries who have EDSS scores 2.0-5.5, and who have experienced at least two relapses within the 3 years prior to enrolment Patients ore randomized to receive once-weekly intramuscular injections of IFN-beta -Ia 30 or 60 mcg for at least 3 years. The primary endpoint of the study is the effect of IFN-beta -Ia therapy on the time to sustained progression of disability. For patients with a baseline EDSS less than or equal to 4.5, sustained progression of disability is defined as a I point increase in EDSS from baseline, maintained for 6 months. For patients with baseline EDSS less than or equal to 5, sustained progression of disability is defined as reaching on EDSS greater than or equal to 6.0 maintained for 6 months. EDSS scores will be determined every 3 months. A series of prospectively defined secondary and tertiary efficacy endpoints will be examined Safety will be monitored throughout the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without gadolinium-enhancement has been Performed in at least 358 patients at baseline and repeated annually after enrolment In a subset of these patients, a frequent MRI study is also being performed

Escalating immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis--new aspects and practical application

Recent clinical studies in multiple sclerosis (MS) provide new data on the treatment of clinically isolated syndromes, on secondary progression, on direct comparison of immunomodulatory treatments and on dosing issues. All these studies have important implications for the optimized care of MS patients. The multiple sclerosis therapy consensus group (MSTCG) critically evaluated the available data and provides recommendations for the application of immunoprophylactic therapies. Initiation of treatment after the first relapse may be indicated if there is clear evidence on MRI for subclinical dissemination of disease. Recent trials show that the efficacy of interferon beta treatment is more likely if patients in the secondary progressive phase of the disease still have superimposed bouts or other indicators of inflammatory disease activity than without having them. There are now data available, which suggest a possible dose-effect relation for recombinant beta-interferons. These studies have to be interpreted with caution, as some potentially important issues in the design of these studies (e. g. maintenance of blinding in the clinical part of the study) were not adequately addressed. A meta-analysis of selected interferon trials has been published challenging the value of recombinant IFN beta in MS. The pitfalls of that report are discussed in the present review as are other issues relevant to treatment including the new definition of MS, the problem of treatment failure and the impact of cost-effectiveness analyses. The MSTCG panel recommends that the new diagnostic criteria proposed by McDonald et al. should be applied if immunoprophylactic treatment is being considered. The use of standardized clinical documentation is now generally proposed to facilitate the systematic evaluation of individual patients over time and to allow retrospective evaluations in different patient cohorts. This in turn may help in formulating recommendations for the application of innovative products to patients and to health care providers. Moreover, in long-term treated patients, secondary treatment failure should be identified by pre-planned follow-up examinations, and other treatment options should then be considered