Influence of Calendar Period on the Association Between BMI and Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis of 31 Cohorts

Objective: The association between obesity and coronary heart disease (CHD) may have changed over time, for example due to improved pharmacological treatment of CHD risk factors. This meta-analysis of 31 prospective cohort studies explores the influence of calendar period on CHD risk associated with body mass index (BMI). Design and Methods: The relative risks (RRs) of CHD for a five-BMI-unit increment and BMI categories were pooled by means of random effects models. Meta-regression analysis was used to examine the influence of calendar period (>1985 v 1985) in univariate and multivariate analyses (including mean population age as a covariate). Results: The age, sex, and smoking adjusted RR (95% confidence intervals) of CHD for a five-BMI-unit increment was 1.28(1.22:1.34). For underweight, overweight and obesity, the RRs (compared to normal weight) were 1.11(0.91:1.36), 1.31(1.22:1.41), and 1.78(1.55:2.04), respectively. The univariate analysis indicated 31% (95%CI: 56:0) lower RR of CHD associated with a five-BMI-unit increment and a 51% (95%CI: 78: 14)) lower RR associated with obesity in studies starting after 1985 (n ¼ 15 and 10, respectively) compared to studies starting in or before 1985 (n ¼ 16 and 10). However, in the multivariate analysis, only mean population age was independently associated with the RRs for a five-BMI-unit increment and obesity ( 29(95%CI: 55: 5)) and 31(95%CI: 66:3), respectively) per 10-year increment in mean age). Conclusion: This study provides no consistent evidence for a difference in the association between BMI and CHD by calendar period. The mean population age seems to be the most important factor that modifies the association between the risk of CHD and BMI, in which the RR decreases with increasing age

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study)

Background: Recent non-randomized studies suggest that extended endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is equally effective in removing large rectal adenomas as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). If equally effective, EMR might be a more cost-effective approach as this strategy does not require expensive equipment, general anesthesia and hospital admission. Furthermore, EMR appears to be associated with fewer complications. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of TEM and EMR for the resection of large rectal adenomas. Methods/design. Multicenter randomized trial among 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with a rectal adenoma 3 cm, located between 115 cm ab ano, will be randomized to a TEM- or EMR-treatment strategy. For TEM, patients will be treated under general anesthesia, adenomas will be dissected en-bloc by a full-thickness excision, and patients will be admitted to the hospital. For EMR, no or conscious sedation is used, lesions will be resected through the submucosal plane i

The influence of guideline revisions on the process and outcome of hypertension management in general practice: A descriptive study

Background: Blood pressure does not reach guideline targets in the majority of hypertensive patients. Longitudinal data from general practice records on trends in hypertension management and the influence of guideline changes are lacking. Objective: To describe the longitudinal impact of guideline revisions on the process and outcome of hypertension management in a primary care based database. Methods: We extracted data from the Nijmegen MonitoringProject (NMP), an academic practice-based research network with 50 000 patients listed. Based on the years of publication of the first Dutch guideline on hypertension (1991) and two revisions (1997 and 2003), we formed three cohorts of patients newly diagnosed with hypertension. We compared data such as patient characteristics, 2-year blood pressure course, type of first-choice antihypertensive drugs, and number of medications after 2 years of treatment. Results: Both the mean age at time of diagnosis of hypertension and pulse pressure rose between cohorts. In agreement with revisions in the guidelines, the use of diuretics as first-choice drugs increased significantly from the first to the last cohort. The percentage of patients with three or more antihypertensive drugs remained equal. The relative 2-year systolic blood pressure decline did not differ with clinical relevance between the cohorts. Conclusion: Our study has demonstrated that general practitioners achieve substantial and prolonged blood pressure reduction. However, guideline revisions do not seem to influence the amount of reduction, despite clear formulation of stricter treatment goals. In addition to qualitative research to identify the causes of this phenomenon, research to evaluate the effect of expert support systems on risk awareness and risk gain by additional treatment is necessary

Thirty-minute compared to standardised office blood pressure measurement in general practice

Background: Although blood pressure measurement is one of themost frequently performed measurements in clinical practice, there are concerns about its reliability. Serial, automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement has the potential to reduce measurement bias and 'white-coat effect'. Aim: To study agreement of 30-minute office blood pressure measurement (OBPM) with standardised OBPM, and to compare repeatability. Design and setting: Method comparison study in two general practices in the Netherlands. Method: Thirty-minute and standardised OBPM was carried out with the same, validated device in 83 adult patients, and the procedure was repeated after 2 weeks. During 30-minute OBPM, blood pressure was measured automatically every 3minutes, with the patient in a sitting position, alone in a quiet room. Agreement between 30-minute and standardised OBPM was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Repeatability of the blood pressure measurement methods after 2 weeks was expressed as the mean difference in combination with the standard deviation of difference (SDD). Results: Mean 30-minute OBPM readings were 7.6/2.5 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.1 to 9.1/1.5 to 3.4 mmHg) lower than standardised OBPM readings. The mean difference and SDD between repeated 30-minute OBPMs (mean difference = 3/1 mmHg, 95%CI = 1 to 5/0 to 2 mmHg; SDD 9.5/5.3 mmHg) were lower than those of standardised OBPMs (mean difference = 6/2 mmHg, 95%CI = 4 to 8/1 to 4 mmHg; SDD 10.9/6.3 mmHg). Conclusion: Thirty-minute OBPM resulted in lower readings than standardised OBPM and had a better repeatability. These results suggest that 30-minute OBPM better reflects the patient's true blood pressure than standardised OBPM does