Potential improvement of pregnancy outcome through prenatal small for gestational age detection

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome between prenatally detected and nonprenatally detected small for gestational age (SGA) neonates born at term.STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study. All singleton infants, born SGA in cephalic position between 36(0/7) and 41(0/7) weeks gestation, were classified as either prenatally detected SGA or nonprenatally detected SGA. With propensity score matching we created groups with comparable baseline characteristics. We compared these groups for composite adverse perinatal outcome, labor induction, and cesarean section rates.RESULTS: We included 718 SGA infants, of whom 555 (77%) were not prenatally detected. Composite adverse neonatal outcome did not differ statistically significant between the matched prenatally detected and the nonprenatally detected group (5.5 vs. 7.4%, odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-1.8). However, perinatal mortality only occurred in the nonprenatally detected group (1.8% [3/163] in the matched cohort, 1.3% [7/555] in the complete cohort). In the propensity matched prenatally detected SGA group both induction of labor (57 vs. 9%, OR 14.0, 95% CI: 7.4-26.2) and cesarean sections (20 vs. 8%, OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.5-5.8) were more often performed compared with the nonprenatally detected SGA group.CONCLUSION: Prenatal SGA detection at term allows timely induction of labor and cesarean sections thus potentially preventing stillbirth

Women's experiences with vaginal examinations during labor in the Netherlands

Vaginal digital examination (VE) is a routine medical procedure during labor to assess the start and progression of labor. This study explores women's experiences with VE's during labor in the Netherlands. An exploratory anonymous online survey was distributed among Dutch women who underwent a trial of labor and gave birth to a living term child in the previous six months. Unadjusted odds ratios are calculated to establish associations between women's characteristics and reporting a negative experience with VE's. Of the 159 women who met the inclusion criteria, 56 women (35.2%) reported a negative experience with the VE. These women reported more pain, embarrassment, not being able to relax, not feeling respected and not feeling the possibility to stop the examination. The odds of reporting negative experiences increased by giving birth in hospital, an instrumental delivery, more examinations, more different caretakers performing the examination and caregivers not introducing themselves before the examination. About 41.7% of the women reported being examined more often than advised in national and international guidelines (every two to four hours). Although our study is limited, it shows that experiences with the VE during labor can be negative and should be considered carefully. We promote research of and teaching the use of additional noninvasive methods to assess progression of labor in daily clinical practice. We conclude that the number of VE's during labor should be restricted as much as possible. VE's should only be performed in the interest of the woman in labor, after her informed consent and preferably performed by as few different caregivers as possibl

CONDISOX-continued versus discontinued oxytocin stimulation of induced labour in a double-blind randomised controlled trial

Background: Oxytocin is an effective drug for induction of labour, but is associated with serious adverse effects of which uterine tachysystole, fetal distress and the need of immediate delivery are the most common. Discontinuation of oxytocin once the active phase of labour is established could reduce the adverse effects. The objective is to investigate how the caesarean section rate is affected when oxytocin stimulation is discontinued in the active phase of labour compared to labours where oxytocin is continued. Methods: CONDISOX is a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted at Danish and Dutch Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The first participant was recruited on April 8 2016. Based on a clinically relevant relative reduction in caesarean section rate of 7%, an alpha of 0.05, a beta of 80%, we aim for 1200 participating women (600 in each arm). The CONDISOX trial includes women at a gestational age of 37-42 complete weeks of pregnancy, who have uterine activity stimulated with oxytocin infusion for the induction of labour. Women are randomised when the active phase of labour becomes established, to study medication containing either oxytocin (continuous group) or placebo (discontinued group) infusion. Women are stratified by birth site, indication for oxytocin stimulation (induction of labour, prelabour rupture of membranes) and parity (nulliparous, parous +/-previous caesarean section). We will compare the primary outcome, caesarean section rate, in the two groups using a chi-square test with a p-value of 0.05. If superiority is not demonstrated, we have a pre-defined post hoc non-inferiority boundary (margin, delta) at 1.09. Secondary outcomes include duration of the active phase of labour, incidence of uterine tachysystole, postpartum haemorrhage, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, Apgar score, umbilical arterial blood pH, and birth experience. Discussion: The high frequency of oxytocin use and the potential risks of both maternal and fetal adverse effects of oxytocin emphasise the need to determine the optimal oxytocin regime for induction of labour. Trial registration: NCT02553226 (registered September 17, 2015). Eudra-CT number: 2015-002942-30

Does measurement of intrauterine pressure have predictive value during oxytocin-augmented labor?

In a previous randomized trial that compared monitoring uterine contractions with an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC) versus external monitoring, we demonstrated that use of an IUPC did not improve the outcome of labor. To provide insight in the lack of a positive effect, we evaluated level of IUP in Montevideo units (MU) in correlation with dysfunctional labor and adverse neonatal outcome. Here, we present two secondary analyses on the 503 women who had IUP measured in the trial. Firstly, we assessed labor outcome in relation to the highest IUP measured at any time during labor. Secondly, we assessed labor outcome to the IUP registered at the last vaginal examination during the first stage of labor in two study groups (above and below 200 MU). Women with lower IUP were statistically significant older, had pregnancies with a longer gestational age, longer labors and neonates with a higher birth weight. The risk of a cesarean section was higher in women who had low IUP during labor (Likelihood Ratio 1.6 for IUP   300 MU). IUP was not associated with neonatal outcome. IUP is associated with mode of delivery. However, use of internal tocodynamometry does not improve birth outcome

Does use of an intrauterine catheter during labor increase risk of infection?

Objective. To determine whether the use of an intrauterine catheter during labor is related to the occurrence of infection in mother or newborn during labor and up to 3 weeks postpartum. Methods. We performed a follow-up study of 1435 women who participated in a previously published multicentre randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands that assigned women in whom labor was induced or augmented with intravenous oxytocin to internal or external tocodynamometry. In the present post hoc analysis, we assessed the risk for infection, defined as a composite measure of any clinical sign of infection, treatment with antibiotics or sepsis during labor or in the postpartum period up to 3 weeks in mother or newborn. Results. There were 64 cases with indication of infection in the intrauterine catheter group (8.8%) versus 74 cases in the external monitoring group (10.4%). Relative risk: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-1.1, and p: 0.33. Conclusion. Use of an intrauterine catheter during labor does not increase the risk of infectio

Outcomes After Internal Versus External Tocodynamometry for Monitoring Labor

BACKGROUND It has been hypothesized that internal tocodynamometry, as compared with external monitoring, may provide a more accurate assessment of contractions and thus improve the ability to adjust the dose of oxytocin effectively, resulting in fewer operative deliveries and less fetal distress. However, few data are available to test this hypothesis. METHODS We performed a randomized, controlled trial in six hospitals in the Netherlands to compare internal tocodynamometry with external monitoring of uterine activity in women for whom induced or augmented labor was required. The primary outcome was the rate of operative deliveries, including both cesarean sections and instrumented vaginal deliveries. Secondary outcomes included the use of antibiotics during labor, time from randomization to delivery, and adverse neonatal outcomes (defined as any of the following: an Apgar score at 5 minutes of less than 7, umbilical-artery pH of less than 7.05, and neonatal hospital stay of longer than 48 hours). RESULTS We randomly assigned 1456 women to either internal tocodynamometry (734) or external monitoring (722). The operative-delivery rate was 31.3% in the internal-tocodynamometry group and 29.6% in the external-monitoring group (relative risk with internal monitoring, 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.2). Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. The rate of adverse neonatal outcomes was 14.3% with internal monitoring and 15.0% with external monitoring (relative risk, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.2). No serious adverse events associated with use of the intrauterine pressure catheter were reported. CONCLUSIONS Internal tocodynamometry during induced or augmented labor, as compared with external monitoring, did not significantly reduce the rate of operative deliveries or of adverse neonatal outcomes. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN13667534; Netherlands Trial number, NTR285.