21 research outputs found

    An evaluation of NEXRAD precipitation estimates in complex terrain

    Get PDF
    This is the published version. Copyright 1999 American Geophysical UnionNext Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) precipitation estimates are used for hydrological, meteorological, and climatological studies at a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. The utility of radar-based precipitation estimates in such applications hinges on an understanding of the sources and magnitude of estimation error. This study examines precipitation estimation in the complex mountainous terrain of the northern Appalachian Mountains. Hourly digital precipitation (HDP) products for two WSR-88D radars in New York state are evaluated for a 2-year period. This analysis includes evaluation of range dependence and spatial distribution of estimates, radar intercomparisons for the overlap region, and radar-gage comparisons. The results indicate that there are unique challenges for radar-rainfall estimation in mountainous terrain. Beam blockage is a serious problem that is not corrected by existing NEXRAD algorithms. Underestimation and nondetection of precipitation are also significant concerns. Improved algorithms are needed for merging estimates from multiple radars with spatially variable biases

    Towards better utilization of NEXRAD data in hydrology: An overview of hydro-NEXRAD

    Get PDF
    With a very modest investment in computer hardware and the open-source local data manger (LDM) software from UCAR\u27s Unidata Program Center, an individual researcher can receive a variety of NEXRAD Level III gridded rainfall products, and the unprocessed Level II data in real-time from most NEXRAD radars. Additionally, the National Climatic Data Center has vast archives of these products and Level II data. Still, significant obstacles remain in order to unlock the full potential of the data. One set of obstacles is related to effective management of multi-terabyte data sets: storing, compressing, and backing up. A second set of obstacles, for hydrologists and hydrometeorologists in particular, is that the NEXRAD Level III products are not well suited for application in hydrology. There is a strong need for the generation of high-quality products directly from the Level II data with well-documented steps that include quality control, removal of false echoes, rainfall estimation algorithms with variety of corrections, coordinate conversion and georeferencing, conversion to a convenient data format(s), and integration with GIS. For hydrologists it is imperative that these procedures are basin-centered as opposed to radar-centered. Thirdly, the amount of data present in a multi-year, multi-radar dataset is such that simple cataloging and indexing of the data is not sufficient. Rather, sophisticated metadata extraction and management techniques are required. The authors describe and discuss the Hydro-NEXRAD software system that addresses the above three challenges. With support from the National Science Foundation through its ITR program, the authors are developing a basin-centered framework for addressing all these issues in a comprehensive manner, tailored specifically for use of NEXRAD data in hydrology and hydrometeorology. Through a flexible web interface users can search a large metadata database base, managed by a relational database, for subsets of interest. Well-chosen and documented defaults are provided for the flow from unprocessed NEXRAD data to basin-centered rainfall estimates at a desired space-time resolution. In addition to the web interface, there are web services that provide access to scripts and compiled programs. © 2007 ASCE

    The fractional coverage of rainfall over a grid: Analyses of NEXRAD data over the southern plains. Water Resour Res 32

    No full text
    Abstract. An important parameter in land surface hydrology is the fractional area of a model grid receiving rainfall when rain is observed. Using NEXRAD (Next Generation Weather Radar) hourly rainfall estimates for the southern Plains, we examined the temporal variability in this quantity and tested the important assumptions of the threshold method. The following conclusions are reached. First, seasonal/diurnal variations explain less than 18% of the variance at all spatial scales examined; an efficient method of computing fractional coverage must consider the large event-scale variability. Second, stationarity in conditional distributions of spatial rainfall, a key assumption in the threshold method, is not warranted at the event scale for small grids or at the seasonal/ diurnal scale for large grids. Third, biases are introduced by the high correlation between the parameter and the independent variable of the threshold method. Fourth, the spatial conditional mean rain rate is higher than its temporal counterpart for all cases examined; the ergodicity assumption overpredicts the fractional coverage. Two simple methods were proposed to solve the above problems. Results of an intercomparison showed that they can modestly improve the threshold method
    corecore