40 research outputs found

    Detection of occult pneumonia in a pediatric emergency department

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Many children undergo chest radiography (CXR) in their evaluation of a febrile illness. Pneumonia without signs of respiratory distress or ausculatory findings has been previously described (termed occult pneumonia [OP]). OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of OP among children who have CXR performed and to identify clinical predictors of OP. METHODS: A prospective observational study of children undergoing CXR for possible pneumonia was conducted. Standardized data forms were completed before the CXR. Univariate analysis and recursive partitioning were used to identify predictors of OP. RESULTS: Of 1866 patients enrolled, 308 had no evidence of respiratory distress or lower respiratory tract findings and were studied for OP. Twenty-one patients had radiographic OP (6.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0%-10.6%). Age, height of fever, duration or quality of cough, and pulse oximetry were not associated with OP. A decision rule based on fever for 1 day or longer or with a combination of fever for less than 1 day but worsening cough identifies patients at greater risk for OP (likelihood ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.21-1.77). No patient with fever for less than 1 day and without any cough or without worsening cough had pneumonia (likelihood ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Occult pneumonia was identified in 1 of 15 patients undergoing CXR without respiratory distress or ausculatory findings. Obtaining a CXR for the detection of OP in children without cough and with fever for less than 1 day in duration should be discouraged

    Measuring complications of serious pediatric emergencies using ICD‐10

    Full text link
    ObjectiveTo create definitions for complications for 16 serious pediatric conditions using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification or Procedure Coding System (ICD‐10‐CM/PCS), and to assess whether complication rates are similar to those measured with ICD‐9‐CM/PCS.Data SourcesThe Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Emergency Department and Inpatient Databases from five states between 2014 and 2017 were used to identify cases and assess complication rates. Incidences were calculated using population counts from the 5‐year American Community Survey.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsPatients were identified by the presence of a diagnosis code for one of the 16 serious conditions. Only the first encounter for a given condition by a patient was included. Encounters resulting in transfer were excluded as the presence of complications was unknown.Study DesignWe defined complications using data elements routinely available in administrative databases including ICD‐10‐CM/PCS codes. The definitions were adapted from ICD‐9‐CM/PCS using general equivalence mappings and refined using consensus opinion. We included 16 serious conditions: appendicitis, bacterial meningitis, compartment syndrome, new‐onset diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), ectopic pregnancy, empyema, encephalitis, intussusception, mastoiditis, myocarditis, orbital cellulitis, ovarian torsion, sepsis, septic arthritis, stroke, and testicular torsion. Using data from children under 18 years, we compared incidences and complication rates across the ICD‐10‐CM/PCS transition for each condition using interrupted time series.Principal FindingsThere were 61 314 ED visits for a serious condition; the most common was appendicitis (n = 37 493). Incidence rates for each condition were not significantly different across the ICD‐10‐CM/PCS transition for 13/16 conditions. Three differed: empyema (increased 42%), orbital cellulitis (increased 60%), and sepsis (increased 26%). Complication rates were not significantly different for each condition across the ICD‐10‐CM/PCS transition, except appendicitis (odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.57‐0.68), DKA (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.92‐7.50), and orbital cellulitis (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30‐0.95).ConclusionsFor most conditions, incidences and complication rates were similar before and after the transition to ICD‐10‐CM/PCS codes, suggesting our system identifies complications of conditions in administrative data similarly using ICD‐9‐CM/PCS and ICD‐10‐CM/PCS codes. This system may be applied to screen for cases with complications and in health services research.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167093/1/hesr13615-sup-0003-FigureS1.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167093/2/hesr13615_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167093/3/hesr13615-sup-0001-Authormatrix.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167093/4/hesr13615.pd

    Clinical predictors of pneumonia among children with wheezing

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: The goal was to identify factors associated with radiographically confirmed pneumonia among children with wheezing in the emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed with children RESULTS: A total of 526 patients met the inclusion criteria; the median age was 1.9 years (interquartile range: 0.7-4.5 years), and 36% were hospitalized. A history of wheezing was present for 247 patients (47%). Twenty-six patients (4.9% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3-7.3]) had radiographic pneumonia. History of fever at home (positive likelihood ratio [LR]: 1.39 [95% CI: 1.13-1.70]), history of abdominal pain (positive LR: 2.85 [95% CI: 1.08-7.54]), triage temperature of \u3eor=38 degrees C (positive LR: 2.03 [95% CI: 1.34-3.07]), maximal temperature in the ED of \u3eor=38 degrees C (positive LR: 1.92 [95% CI: 1.48-2.49]), and triage oxygen saturation of \u3c92% (positive LR: 3.06 [95% CI: 1.15-8.16]) were associated with increased risk of pneumonia. Among afebrile children (temperature of \u3c38 degrees C) with wheezing, the rate of pneumonia was very low (2.2% [95% CI: 1.0-4.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic pneumonia among children with wheezing is uncommon. Historical and clinical factors may be used to determine the need for chest radiography for wheezing children. The routine use of chest radiography for children with wheezing but without fever should be discouraged
    corecore