Defective enzyme protein in lipoprotein lipase deficiency

A monoclonal antibody to lipoprotein lipase (LPL) has been used in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for LPL protein mass. Measurement of LPL immunoreactive mass in pre- and postheparin plasma distinguished three classes of abnormalities in patients with classical deficiency of lipoprotein lipase activity. The class I defect consisted of the absence of LPL immunoreactive homodimer in pre- and postheparin plasma compatible with a potential 'null allele'. Patients with a class II defect had almost no LPL immunoreactive mass in preheparin plasma but showed an increase in their LPL mass of 68 +/- 23 ng ml-1 (mean +/- SD) after heparin. Patients with the class III defect had considerable amounts of LPL immunoreactive material in preheparin plasma (159 +/- 190 ng ml-1). Heparin administration, however, caused very little additional release of LPL into the plasma (16 +/- 51 ng ml-1). Thus although both class II and class III patients had an LPL protein with abnormal catalytic activity, class III patients also appeared to have a defect in heparin binding of LPL. To test this hypothesis, postheparin plasma of classes II and III patients was analysed by heparin-Sepharose chromatography. In contrast to class II patients, the LPL immunoreactive mass of class III patients did not show affinity for the heparin and eluted in the column void volume, suggesting the class III defect is also associated with a defect in heparin binding

Coexistence of abnormalities of hepatic lipase and lipoprotein lipase in a large family

A large family is reported with familial hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) deficiency and with the coexistence of reduced lipoprotein lipase (LPL) similar to the heterozygote state of LPL deficiency. The proband was initially detected because of hypertriglyceridemia and chylomicronemia. He was later demonstrated to have beta-VLDL despite an apo E3/E3 phenotype and the lack of stigmata of type III hyperlipoproteinemia. The proband had no HTGL activity in postheparin plasma. Two of his half-sisters had very low HTGL activity (39 and 31 nmol free fatty acids/min/ml; normal adult female greater than 44). His son and daughters had decreased HTGL activity (normal male and preadolescent female greater than 102), which would be expected in obligate heterozygotes for HTGL deficiency. Low HTGL activity was associated with LDL particles which were larger and more buoyant. Several family members, including the proband, had reduced LPL activity and mass less than that circumscribed by the 95% confidence-interval ellipse for normal subjects and had hyperlipidemia similar to that described in heterozygote relatives of patients with LPL deficiency. All the sibs with hyperlipidemia had a reduced LPL activity and mass, while subjects with isolated reduced HTGL (with normal LPL activity) had normal lipid phenotypes. Analysis of genomic DNA from these subjects by restriction-enzyme digestion revealed no major abnormalities in the structure of either the HTGL or the LPL gene. Compound heterozygotes for HTGL and LPL deficiency show lipoprotein physiological characteristics typical for HTGL deficiency, while their variable lipid phenotype is typical for LPL deficiency