Trabectedin and its potential in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma

Trabectedin is a new marine-derived compound that binds the DNA minor groove and interacts with proteins of the DNA repair machinery. Phase I trials have established the standard regimen as 1500 μg/m2 24-hour continuous infusion repeated every 3 weeks. Several phase II trials have shown response in 5%–10% of unselected patients with soft tissue sarcoma failing prior chemotherapy and disease stabilisation in 30%–40%. Furthermore, prolonged disease control has been described in 15%–20% of patients. Toxicities are mainly haematological and hepatic with grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia observed in approximately 50% and 20% of patients respectively, and grade 3–4 elevation of liver enzymes observed in 35%–50% of patients treated with trabectedin. Current research focuses on the identification of predictive factors for patients with soft tissue sarcoma treated with trabectedin

Phase II multicohort study of atezolizumab monotherapy in multiple advanced solid cancers

PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor; Atezolizumab; Solid tumorsInhibidor del punto de control PD-L1; Atezolizumab; Tumores sólidosInhibidor del punt de control PD-L1; Atezolizumab; Tumors sòlidsBackground The programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor atezolizumab had shown clinical activity against several advanced malignancies. Patients and methods This phase II, open-label basket study (NCT02458638) was conducted in 16 main cohorts of patients aged ≥18 years with stage III or IV solid tumors. In stage I, 12 patients were enrolled into each cohort. Treatment was atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. The primary efficacy endpoint was the non-progression rate (NPR) at 18 weeks in treated, assessable patients. NPR ≤20% was not of interest for development as monotherapy, and NPR ≥40% was defined as the threshold of benefit/success. If ≥3 patients had non-progressive disease in stage I (interim analysis), 13 additional patients could be enrolled into stage II (final analysis). Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints were also evaluated. Results Overall, 474 patients were enrolled and treated; 433 were included in the efficacy set. Due partly to slow recruitment because of competing trials and limited efficacy at interim analyses, enrollment was stopped early, including in cohorts that passed stage I boundaries of success. NPR was >20% in five cohorts: cervical cancer {n = 27; NPR 44.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25.5% to 64.7%]}; follicular/papillary thyroid cancer [n = 11; 54.5% (95% CI 23.4% to 83.3%)]; thymoma [n = 13; 76.9% (95% CI: 46.2% to 95.0%)]; gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and lung neuroendocrine tumors [NETs; n = 24; 41.7% (95% CI 22.1% to 63.4%)], and low/intermediate grade carcinoid GEP and lung NETs [n = 12; 58.3% (95% CI 27.7% to 84.8%)]. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55.3% of patients overall, and at grade 3, 4, and 5 in 10.3%, 1.7%, and 0.4%, respectively. Conclusions Atezolizumab monotherapy was effective in the cervical cancer cohort. The interim benefit threshold was crossed in patients with follicular/papillary thyroid cancer, thymoma, and GEP and lung NETs, but recruitment was stopped before these signals could be confirmed in stage II. Safety was consistent with previous findings.This study was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche (no grant number) who provided financial support for the conduct of study and were involved in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. They also funded assistance with manuscript writing by a professional medical writer

Lymphoma and Myeloma Cell Resistance to Cytotoxic Agents and Ionizing Radiations Is Not Affected by Exposure to Anti–IL-6 Antibody

Background: Production of high levels of IL-6 is often correlated with resistance to cytotoxics or ionizing radiations, in cancer cell lines as in various cancer patients. We investigated whether monoclonal antibodies directed against IL-6 may enable to reverse resistance of cancer cell lines. Methodology/Principal Findings: We exposed ten haematological cancer cells from lymphoma, myeloma, or leukemia origins to cytotoxics or ionizing radiations and assessed the effects of anti–IL-6 antibody addition on cell proliferation, apoptosis, or IL-6 signaling. A strong correlation between IL-6 secretion, measured by ELISA, and resistance to doxorubicin as ionizing radiations was observed in the multiple myeloma U266 and the Burkitt’s lymphoma Daudi and Namalwa cells. Although an anti–IL-6 antibody combined to both treatments efficiently blocked IL-6 signaling in U266 cells, expressing the IL-6 receptor gp80, it did not increase treatment-induced anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on these cells, as well as on Daudi and Namalwa cells. This lack of effect could be related to diverse factors: 1) a higher release of the soluble form of IL-6 receptor gp80 in response to doxorubicin and irradiation from all cell lines, 2) an impaired level of the IL-6 pathway inhibitor SOCS3 in Daudi cells, and 3) an increased release of IL-10 and TNFa, two cytokines involved in cell radio- and chemoresistance. Conclusions/Significance: These data support the fact that IL-6 is not the preponderant actor of cell resistance to cytotoxic

Patient-reported outcomes and tolerability in patients receiving ripretinib versus sunitinib after treatment with imatinib in INTRIGUE, a phase 3, open-label study

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours; Patient reported outcome measures; Protein kinase inhibitorsTumores del estroma gastrointestinal; Medidas de resultado informadas por el paciente; Inhibidores de proteína quinasaTumors de l'estroma gastrointestinal; Mesures de resultat informades pel pacient; Inhibidors de la proteïna cinasaPurpose In the INTRIGUE trial, ripretinib showed no significant difference versus sunitinib in progression-free survival for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) previously treated with imatinib. We compared the impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients and methods Patients were randomised 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire at day (D)1, and D29 of all cycles until treatment discontinuation. Change from baseline was calculated. Time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) was estimated as the mean number of days without progression, death, or grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events per patient over 1 year of follow-up. Results Questionnaire completion at baseline was 88.1% (199/226) for ripretinib and 87.7% (199/227) for sunitinib and remained high for enrolled patients throughout treatment. Patients receiving sunitinib demonstrated within-cycle variation in self-reported HRQoL, corresponding to the on/off dosing regimen. Patients receiving ripretinib reported better HRQoL at D29 assessments than patients receiving sunitinib on all scales except constipation. HRQoL was similar between treatments at D1 assessments, following 2 weeks without treatment for sunitinib patients. TWiST was greater for ripretinib patients (173 versus 126 days). Conclusion Patients receiving ripretinib experienced better HRQoL than patients receiving sunitinib during the dosing period and similar HRQoL to patients who had not received sunitinib for 2 weeks for all QLQ-C30 domains except constipation. Ripretinib may provide clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib.This study was sponsored by Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC. This article was based on the original study INTRIGUE (NCT03673501) sponsored by Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC. Support for third-party writing assistance for this article, provided by Hannah L Fox, PhD, and Alex Emerson, BA, of Costello Medical, Boston, MA, USA, was funded by Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP) 2022 guidelines (https://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022)

Novel trial designs for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumorTumor del estroma gastrointestinalTumor de l'estroma gastrointestinalThis work was funded in part by the FERO Foundation and the Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer [grant number AECC CLSEN20004SERR], both to CS. The general work of MCH has been supported by grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs [grant number 1 I01 BX005358-01A1] and the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health [grant number 1 R21 CA263400-01] and by philanthropic donations from the GIST Cancer Research Fund and the Jonathan David Foundation

SELNET clinical practice guidelines for bone sarcoma

Bone sarcoma; Clinical guidelines; Latin-America contextSarcoma óseo; Guías clínicas; Contexto latinoamericanoSarcoma ossi; Guies clíniques; Context llatinoamericàBone sarcoma are infrequent diseases, representing < 0.2% of all adult neoplasms. A multidisciplinary management within reference centers for sarcoma, with discussion of the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies within an expert multidisciplinary tumour board, is essential for these patients, given its heterogeneity and low frequency. This approach leads to an improvement in patient’s outcome, as demonstrated in several studies. The Sarcoma European Latin-American Network (SELNET), aims to improve clinical outcome in sarcoma care, with a special focus in Latin-American countries. These Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) have been developed and agreed by a multidisciplinary expert group (including medical and radiation oncologist, surgical oncologist, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologist, pathologist, molecular biologist and representatives of patients advocacy groups) of the SELNET consortium, and are conceived to provide the standard approach to diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of bone sarcoma patients in the Latin-American context.The authors would like to thank the SELNET project, which has received funding from the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant number 825806)

An Approach to Solving the Complex Clinicogenomic Data Landscape in Precision Oncology: Learnings From the Design of WAYFIND-R, a Global Precision Oncology Registry

Oncología de precisión; Datos clinicogenómicosOncologia de precisió; Dades clinicogenòmiquesPrecision oncology; Clinicogenomic dataPrecision oncology, where patients are given therapies based on their genomic profile and disease trajectory, is rapidly evolving to become a pivotal part of cancer management, supported by regulatory approvals of biomarker-matched targeted therapies and cancer immunotherapies. However, next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based technologies have revealed an increasing number of molecular-based cancer subtypes with rare patient populations, leading to difficulties in executing/recruiting for traditional clinical trials. Therefore, approval of novel therapeutics based on traditional interventional studies may be difficult and time consuming, with delayed access to innovative therapies. Real-world data (RWD) that describe the patient journey in routine clinical practice can help elucidate the clinical utility of NGS-based genomic profiling, multidisciplinary case discussions, and targeted therapies. We describe key learnings from the setup of WAYFIND-R (NCT04529122), a first-of-its-kind global cancer registry collecting RWD from patients with solid tumors who have undergone NGS-based genomic profiling. The meaning of ‘generalizability’ and ‘high quality’ for RWD across different geographic areas was revisited, together with patient recruitment processes, and data sharing and privacy. Inspired by these learnings, WAYFIND-R’s design will help physicians discuss patient treatment plans with their colleagues, improve understanding of the impact of treatment decisions/cancer care processes on patient outcomes, and provide a platform to support the design and conduct of further clinical/epidemiologic research. WAYFIND-R demonstrates user-friendly, electronic case report forms, standardized collection of molecular tumor board-based decisions, and a dashboard providing investigators with access to local cohort-level data and the ability to interact with colleagues or search the entire registry to find rare populations. Overall, WAYFIND-R will inform on best practice for NGS-based treatment decisions by clinicians, foster global collaborations between cancer centers and enable robust conclusions regarding outcome data to be drawn, improve understanding of disparities in patients’ access to advanced diagnostics and therapies, and ultimately drive advances in precision oncology

miRNA Profiling: How to Bypass the Current Difficulties in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sarcomas

Sarcomas are divided into a group with specific alterations and a second presenting a complex karyotype, sometimes difficult to diagnose or with few therapeutic options available. We assessed if miRNA profiling by TaqMan low density arrays could predict the response of undifferentiated rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and osteosarcoma to treatment. We showed that miRNA signatures in response to a therapeutic agent (chemotherapy or the mTOR inhibitor RAD-001) were cell and drug specific on cell lines and a rat osteosarcoma model. This miRNA signature was related to cell or tumour sensitivity to this treatment and might be not due to chromosomal aberrations, as revealed by a CGH array analysis of rat tumours. Strikingly, miRNA profiling gave promising results for patient rhabdomyosarcoma, discriminating all types of RMS: (Pax+) or undifferentiated alveolar RMS as well as embryonal RMS. As highlighted by these results, miRNA profiling emerges as a potent molecular diagnostic tool for complex karyotype sarcomas

Cancer screening in France: subjects’ and physicians’ attitudes

International audienceOBJECTIVE: Since screening for cancer has been advocated, funded, and promoted in France, it is important to evaluate the attitudes of subjects in the general population and general practitioners (GPs) toward cancer screening strategies. METHODS: EDIFICE is a nationwide opinion poll that was carried out by telephone among a representative sample of 1,504 subjects living in France and aged between 40 and 75 years and among a representative sample of 600 GPs. The questionnaire administered to subjects queried about previous screening for cancer. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of women stated that they had undergone at least one mammography. Although rated "A" recommendation-strongly recommended-by the US Preventive Services Task Force, screening for colorectal cancer received less attention than prostate cancer screening which is rated "I"-insufficient evidence-(reported screening rates of 25% and 36%, respectively). Six percent of subjects stated that they had undergone lung cancer screening. GPs' attitudes toward cancer screening showed similar inconsistencies. CONCLUSIONS: It thus appears that understanding of cancer screening practices in the French general population does not match scientific evidence. To a lesser extent, this also holds for GPs

Quality of Life and Utility in Patients with Metastatic Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma: The Sarcoma Treatment and Burden of Illness in North America and Europe (SABINE) Study

The aim of the study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among metastatic soft tissue (mSTS) or bone sarcoma (mBS) patients who had attained a favourable response to chemotherapy. We employed the EORTC QLQ-C30, the 3-item Cancer-Related Symptoms Questionnaire, and the EQ-5D instrument. HRQoL was evaluated overall and by health state in 120 mSTS/mBS patients enrolled in the SABINE study across nine countries in Europe and North America. Utility was estimated from responses to the EQ-5D instrument using UK population-based weights. The mean EQ-5D utility score was 0.69 for the pooled patient sample with little variation across health states. However, patients with progressive disease reported a clinically significant lower utility (0.56). Among disease symptoms, pain and respiratory symptoms are common. This study showed that mSTS/mBS is associated with reduced HRQoL and utility among patients with metastatic disease