Postsorafenib systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: questions and opportunities after the regorafenib trial.

The search for systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma has been characterized by difficulties and failures. Despite recent progresses, many issues are still to be settled. In particular, the development of drugs inhibiting different neoplastic pathways remains a priority for patients intolerant or resistant to antiangiogenic drugs. This task may be daunting, as previous failures extensively demonstrated. We aimed to identify the future perspective of postsorafenib trials analyzing the strengths and the critical points of past and currently undergoing studies, in the light of the most recent evidences in the field. We identified various points (including stratification, biomarkers, end points, radiologic criteria of response, treatment beyond radiologic progression) that should be considered by future trials to reduce the risks of failure

Antitumoral efficacy of the protease inhibitor gabexate mesilate in colon cancer cells harbouring KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations

The employment of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies represents a backbone of the therapeutic options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, this therapy is poorly effective or ineffective in unselected patients. Mutations in KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes have recently emerged as the best predictive factors of low/absent response to EGFR-targeted therapy. Due to the need for efficacious treatment options for mCRC patients bearing these mutations, in this short report we examined the antitumoral activity of the protease inhibitor gabexate mesilate, alone and in combination with the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab, in a panel of human CRC cell lines harbouring a different expression pattern of wild-type/mutated KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes. Results obtained showed that gabexate mesilate significantly inhibited the growth, invasive potential and tumour-induced angiogenesis in all the CRC cells employed in this study (including those ones harbouring dual KRAS/PIK3CA or BRAF/PIK3CA mutation), while cetuximab affected these parameters only in CRC cells with KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA wild-type. Notably, the antitumoral efficacy of gabexate mesilate and cetuximab in combination was found to be not superior than that observed with gabexate mesilate as single agent. Overall, these preliminary findings suggest that gabexate mesilate could represent a promising therapeutic option for mCRC patients, particularly for those harbouring KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, either as monotherapy or in addition to standard chemotherapy regimens. Further studies to better elucidate gabexate mesilate mechanism of action in CRC cells are therefore warranted

Current Therapeutic Strategies in BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Around 8–12% of patients with advanced colon rectal cancer (CRC) present with BRAF alterations, in particular V600E mutation, which is associated with right-side, poorly differentiated and mucinous type tumors. The presence of BRAF mutation (BRAF-mt) has been identified as a hallmark of poor prognosis and treatment optimization in this patient subgroup is an important goal. Currently, the standard of care is an aggressive strategy involving triplet chemotherapy and anti-VEGF agents, but new therapeutic approaches are emerging. Very promising results have been obtained with targeted therapy combinations, such as anti-BRAF agents plus anti-EGFR agents. Furthermore, around 60% of BRAF-mt patients show a strong association with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and immune checkpoint inhibitors could represent the new standard of care for this subgroup. The focus of this review is to summarize current strategies for BRAF-mt CRC treatment and highlight new therapeutic options

Clinical Features of the Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a very heterogeneous cancer in many aspects including epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and genetics. Medical literature reflects this feature especially in terms of differences of clinical presentation among the intrahepatic/extrahepatic subtypes and according to related risk factors and geographic areas. Consequently these tumors are often challenging to diagnose and treat and the prognosis is poor.This manuscript deals with the clinical presentation and epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma

Metronomic capecitabine vs. best supportive care in Child-Pugh B hepatocellular carcinoma: A proof of concept

There is a relative lack of evidence about systemic treatments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and moderate liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh B). In this multicenter study we retrospectively analyzed data from Child-Pugh B-HCC patients na\uefve to systemic therapies, treated with MC or best supportive care (BSC). To reduce the risk of selection bias, an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was adopted. Propensity score was generated including: extrahepatic spread; macrovascular invasion; performance status, alphafetoprotein > 400 ng/ml, Child- Pugh score [B7 vs. B8-9]. We identified 35 MC-treated patients and 70 controls. Median overall survival was 7.5 [95% CI: 3.733-11.267]in MC-patients and 5.1 months [95% CI: 4.098-6.102] in the BSC group (p = 0.013). In patients treated with MC, median progression-free survival was 4.5 months (95% CI: 2.5-6.5). The univariate unweighted Cox regression showed a 42% reduction in death risk for patients on MC (95%CI: 0.370-0.906; p = 0.017). After weighting for potential confounders, death risk remained essentially unaltered. In the MC group, 12 patients (34.3%) experienced at least one adverse event, the most common of which were: fatigue (17.1%), hand-foot syndrome (8.5%), thrombocytopenia (8.5%), and neutropenia (5.7%). MC seems a safe option for Child-Pugh B-HCC patients. Its potential antitumour activity warrants prospective evaluations

The Best Management of Portal Neoplastic Thrombosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth commonest cancer worldwide. Vascular invasion of the portal vein is one of the most important prognostic factors for survival in HCC patients and the prognosis is generally poor. The optimal treatment for patients with HCC and portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) remains controversial. Although many therapeutic options have been proposed, surgical resection is the only hope of cure for such patients.We present the case of a 74-year-old man diagnosed with a single HCC nodule with portal thrombosis in the right hepatic lobe in the setting of HCV-related liver cirrhosis. After a first approach with a loco-regional treatment not tolerated by the patient, a right hepatectomy proved the best option. One year later the patient is still free from disease

Metronomic capecitabine as second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib discontinuation

Purpose: Metronomic capecitabine (MC) is a well-tolerated systemic treatment showing promising results in one retrospective study, as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: 117 patients undergoing MC were compared to 112 patients, eligible for this treatment, but undergoing best supportive care (BSC) after sorafenib discontinuation for toxicity or HCC progression. The two groups were compared for demographic and clinical features. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to detect independent prognostic factors. To balance confounding factors between the two groups, a propensity score model based on independent prognosticators (performance status, neoplastic thrombosis, causes of sorafenib discontinuation and pre-sorafenib treatment) was performed. Results: Patients undergoing MC showed better performance status, lower tumor burden, lower prevalence of portal vein thrombosis, and better cancer stage. Median (95% CI) post-sorafenib survival (PSS) was longer in MC than in BSC patients [9.5 (7.5\u201311.6) vs 5.0 (4.2\u20135.7) months (p < 0.001)]. Neoplastic thrombosis, cause of sorafenib discontinuation, pre-sorafenib treatment and MC were independent prognosticators. The benefit of capecitabine was confirmed in patients after matching with propensity score [PSS: 9.9 (6.8\u201312.9) vs. 5.8 (4.8\u20136.8) months, (p = 0.001)]. MC lowered the mortality risk by about 40%. MC achieved better results in patients who stopped sorafenib for adverse events than in those who progressed during it [PSS: 17.3 (10.5\u201324.1) vs. 7.8 (5.2\u201310.1) months, (p = 0.035)]. Treatment toxicity was low and easily manageable with dose modulation. Conclusions: MC may be an efficient and safe second-line systemic therapy for HCC patients who discontinued sorafenib for toxicity or tumor progression

Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma

This chapter analyses the role of chemotherapy in the palliative treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.In the wake of evidence of the superiority of cheniotherapy over best supportive care, many studies have evalueted diffrent chemotherapeutic agents. Among them gemcitabine proved the most avtice against biliary tract cancer and its combination with platinum compounds like cisplatin (Gemcis) or oxaliplatin (Gemox) has proved the best systemic therapeutic strategy. Given the results of recent large phase III studies, gemcitabine in association with cisplatin should be considered the standard of care in the first-line setting of advanced cholangiocarcinoma even if no comparative study between Gemcis and Gemox has ever been conducted and a literature analysis of hte main published studies showed that the results obtained with Gemox are not very different from those obtained with Gemcis. Few studies on a salvage chemotherapy after failure of first-line treatment have been coducted due to the rarity of the disease and the frequent rapid decline of perfomance status of patients in this advanced setting

Complete Recalcification Following Arterial Embolization of Massive Osteolytic Bone Metastasis From NSCLC

Complete Recalcification Following Arterial Embolization of Massive Osteolytic Bone Metastasis From NSCL

Good performance of platinum-based chemotherapy for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic and unknown primary neuroendocrine neoplasms

To evaluate efficacy and safety of platinum and etoposide combination in the treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and unknown primary (CUP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), we analysed the records of 21 consecutive patients treated with this regimen from 1999 to 2012. Objective responses were obtained in 11 patients (52%) and disease stability (DS) in 5 (24%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI, 5.33â8.66). Median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% CI, 14.97â17.03). Patients with limited liver disease had a significantly (p = 0.002) better PFS than patients with extrahepatic disease at diagnosis with 9 months (95% CI, 7.14â10.85) vs. 4 months (95% CI, 1.60â6.40). Two patients experienced durable complete response (30 and 90 months). The most common grade 3â4 toxicities were neutropenia (61%), anaemia (50%), nausea and vomiting (27%) and fatigue (22%). The platinum plus etoposide regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile and is effective in patients with GEP and CUP-NECs