42 research outputs found

    Synthesis and biological evaluation of benzodiazepines containing a pentafluorosulfanyl group

    Get PDF
    The widely used pentafluorosulfanyl group (SF5) was deployed as a bioisosteric replacement for a chloro-group in the benzodiazepine diazepam (Valiumℱ). Reaction of 2-amino-5-pentafluorosulfanyl-benzophenone with chloroacetyl chloride followed by hexamethylenetetramine, in the presence of ammonia, led to 7-sulfurpentafluoro-5-phenyl-1H-benzo[1,4]diazepin-2(3H)-one (2c). The latter was able to undergo a Pd-catalysed ortho-arylation, demonstrating that these highly fluorinated benzodiazepines can be further modified to form more complicated scaffolds. The replacement of Cl by the SF5 group, led to a loss of potency for potentiating GABAA receptor activation, most likely because of a lost ligand interaction with His102 in the GABAA receptor α subunit. Dedicated to Professor Jonathan Williams, an inspirational and humble pioneer, a colleague and mentor in chemistry

    Dysbiotic drift: mental health, environmental grey space, and microbiota

    Get PDF

    Do we have a moral responsibility to compensate for vulnerable groups? A discussion on the right to health for LGBT people

    No full text
    Vulnerability is a broad concept widely addressed in recent scholarly literature. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people are among the vulnerable populations with significant disadvantages related to health and the social determinants of health. Medical ethics discourse tackles vulnerability from philosophical and political perspectives. LGBT people experience several disadvantages from both perspectives. This article aims to justify the right to health for LGBT people and their particular claims regarding healthcare because they belong to a vulnerable group. Rawls' theory of justice and Norman Daniels' normal functioning approach will be discussed in this context. Despite the fact that the right to health can be justified by Daniels' normal functioning approach, there is still a theoretical gap in justifying the right to health for particular vulnerable populations such as LGBT peopleand discussing society's duty to compensate for these disadvantages. In search of solid theoretical grounds for the justification of the right to health for LGBT people, the present author takes the opportunity to utilize Daniels' flexible definition of normal functioning to show that normal functioning not only varies by age but also by different states of human existence, including sexual orientation and gender identity, and to propose replacing the life span approach with normal states of human existence
    corecore