Three-slit experiments and quantum nonlocality

An interesting link between two very different physical aspects of quantum mechanics is revealed; these are the absence of third-order interference and Tsirelson's bound for the nonlocal correlations. Considering multiple-slit experiments - not only the traditional configuration with two slits, but also configurations with three and more slits - Sorkin detected that third-order (and higher-order) interference is not possible in quantum mechanics. The EPR experiments show that quantum mechanics involves nonlocal correlations which are demonstrated in a violation of the Bell or CHSH inequality, but are still limited by a bound discovered by Tsirelson. It now turns out that Tsirelson's bound holds in a broad class of probabilistic theories provided that they rule out third-order interference. A major characteristic of this class is the existence of a reasonable calculus of conditional probability or, phrased more physically, of a reasonable model for the quantum measurement process.Comment: 9 pages, no figur

PR-box correlations have no classical limit

One of Yakir Aharonov's endlessly captivating physics ideas is the conjecture that two axioms, namely relativistic causality ("no superluminal signalling") and nonlocality, so nearly contradict each other that a unique theory - quantum mechanics - reconciles them. But superquantum (or "PR-box") correlations imply that quantum mechanics is not the most nonlocal theory (in the sense of nonlocal correlations) consistent with relativistic causality. Let us consider supplementing these two axioms with a minimal third axiom: there exists a classical limit in which macroscopic observables commute. That is, just as quantum mechanics has a classical limit, so must any generalization of quantum mechanics. In this classical limit, PR-box correlations violate relativistic causality. Generalized to all stronger-than-quantum bipartite correlations, this result is a derivation of Tsirelson's bound without assuming quantum mechanics.Comment: for a video of this talk at the Aharonov-80 Conference in 2012 at Chapman University, see quantum.chapman.edu/talk-10, published in Quantum Theory: A Two-Time Success Story (Yakir Aharonov Festschrift), eds. D. C. Struppa and J. M. Tollaksen (New York: Springer), 2013, pp. 205-21

Weak Coin Flipping in a Device-Independent Setting

A protocol is said to be device-independent when the level of its performance can be inferred without making any assumptions regarding the inner workings of the apparatus used to implement it. In this paper we introduce a device-independent weak coin flipping protocol based on a single GHZ test. Interestingly, the protocol calls for the exchange of (quantum) systems between participants; a feature which is not trivial to incorporate in a device-independent setting where a system's behavior may depend on the time, location, and its history. Alice's and Bob's maximal cheating probabilities are given by ≈ 0.974 and cos2 (π/ 8) ≈ 0.854. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe