Treatment of keratinocyte carcinoma in elderly patients - a review of the current literature

A large percentage of the patients with keratinocyte carcinoma (KC, formerly known as non-melanoma skin cancer) is of advanced age and often too frail for standard therapies. However, no specific treatment recommendations are given for this population. This review aimed to give an overview of the current literature on the best practice for the treatment of elderly patients with KC. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, using ‘keratinocyte carcinoma’, ‘elderly’, ‘treatment’ and various synonyms. Case reports, reviews, comments, non-English literature and studies with a sample size <15 were excluded. After selection, a total of 47 studies were reviewed. Two types of studies were identified, focusing on (I) the effect of age on treatment outcomes and (II) alternative treatment schedules for elderly patients. Studies on surgery, the gold standard, describe larger lesions and defect size in the elderly population. Recurrence rate, complication rate and disease-specific survival were not affected by age. Depending on the expected morbidity of a suggested (re-)excision and patient preferences, a conservative watchful waiting policy can be agreed upon as a shared decision. Other common treatment modalities, such as adjuvant radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy and systemic therapy for basal cell carcinoma (BCC), show comparable results in the elderly and younger population. Alternative treatment schedules for elderly patients include primary hypofractionated radiotherapy, which seems effective and well-tolerated, although research is limited to case series. Additionally, localized and topical treatments seem safe and effective especially for low-risk tumours. Data are lacking on the efficacy of systemic therapies of metastatic KC in elderly patients. Efficacy of most treatments (with the exception of photodynamic therapy) is not dependent on age. There is need for more research on the efficacy of adjusted treatment modalities, such as hypofractionated radiotherapy and palliative or curative systemic treatment

Imaging of soft-tissue tumors using L-3-[iodine-123]iodo-alpha-methyl-tyrosine single photon emission computed tomography:Comparison with proliferative and mitotic activity, cellularity, and vascularity

The radiolabeled amino acid L-3.[I-123]-iodo-alpha-methyl-tyrosine (IMT) is a new tumor tracer that accumulates in many tumors and is suitable for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. Using IMT SPECT, we studied 32 patients with a soft-tissue tumor suspected to be a soft-tissue sarcoma to determine whether: (a) tumors can be visualized; (b) benign and malignant lesions can be distinguished; and (c) IMT uptake is related to tumor grade and proliferation. Whole-body imaging was performed 15 min after administration of 300 MBq IMT, biopsy, or resection 1-2 weeks later, IMT uptake was quantified using a region-of-interest method resulting in tumor:background (T:B) ratios. These were compared with tumor grade, mitotic index, tumor cellularity, vascularity, and the Ki-67 proliferation index. Eleven patients had a benign tumor, and 21 patients had a soft-tissue sarcoma, Six benign tumors demonstrated minor IMT uptake, and five lipomas had no uptake. All malignant tumors had high uptake and were clearly visualized. T:B ratios in malignant tumors (3.83 +/- 1.16) were higher (P <0.001) than in benign tumors (152 +/- 0.60). Small

Determinants of delay and association with outcome in head and neck cancer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Head and neck cancers (HNC) are relatively fast-growing tumours, and delay in treatment initiation is associated with tumour progression and adverse outcome. An overview of factors contributing to delay can provide critical insights on necessary adjustments to optimize care pathways. This systematic review aims to identify factors associated with delay and summarize the effect of delay on oncological outcome measures. METHODS: A search strategy was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to search electronic databases for studies assessing the carepathway interval (days between first visit in head and neck oncology center and treatment initiation) and/or time-to-treatment-initiation interval (days between histological diagnosis and treatment initiation) and 1) determinants of delay and/or 2) effect of delay on outcome within these timeframes. Due to heterogeneity between included studies, a meta-analysis was not possible. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. Non-Caucasian race, academic setting, Medicaid/no insurance and radiotherapy as primary treatment were associated with delay. Advanced tumour stage was related to increased time-to-treatment initiation in the four common sites combined (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx). Separate determinants for delay in different tumour locations were identified. In laryngeal, oral cavity cancer and the four common HNC sites combined, delay in start of treatment is associated with decreased overall survival, although no cut-off time point could be determined. CONCLUSION: Race, facility type, type of insurance and radiotherapy as primary treatment were associated with delay and subsequent inferior survival in the four common sites combined