Stimulus-dependent control of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-induced Ca(2+) oscillation frequency by the endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase.

In many cell types, receptor stimulation evokes cytosolic calcium oscillations with a frequency that depends on agonist dose. Previous studies demonstrated controversial effects of changing the activity of the endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase upon the frequency of oscillations. By numerical simulations, we found that the model of De Young and Keizer (J. Keizer and G.W. De Young, 1994, J. Theor. Biol. 166: 431-442), unlike other models, can explain the observed discrepancies, assuming that the different experiments were performed at different stimulus levels. According to model predictions, partial inhibition of internal calcium pumps is expected to increase frequency at low stimulus strength and should have an opposite effect at strong stimuli. Similar results were obtained using an analytical estimation of oscillation period, based on calcium-dependent channel activation and inactivation. In experiments on HeLa cells, 4 nM thapsigargin increased the frequency of calcium oscillations induced by 1 and 2.5 microM histamine but had no effect on supramaximally stimulated cells. In HEp-2 cells, 2 nM thapsigargin slowed down the rapid, ATP-induced oscillations. Our results suggest that in the investigated cell types, the De Young-Keizer model based on inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-dependent calcium-induced calcium release can properly describe intracellular calcium oscillations

Membrane binding properties of IRSp53-missing in metastasis domain (IMD) protein

The 53-kDa insulin receptor substrate protein (IRSp53) organizes the actin cytoskeleton in response to stimulation of small GTPases, promoting the formation of cell protrusions such as filopodia and lamellipodia. IMD is the N-terminal 250 amino acid domain (IRSp53/MIM Homology Domain) of IRSp53 (also called I-BAR), which can bind to negatively charged lipid molecules. Overexpression of IMD induces filopodia formation in cells and purified IMD assembles finger-like protrusions in reconstituted lipid membranes. IMD was shown by several groups to bundle actin filaments, but other groups showed that it also binds to membranes. IMD binds to negatively charged lipid molecules with preference to clusters of PI(4,5)P2. Here, we performed a range of different in vitro fluorescence experiments to determine the binding properties of the IMD to phospholipids. We used different constructs of large unilamellar vesicles (LUVETs), containing neutral or negatively charged phospholipids. We found that IMD has a stronger binding interaction with negatively charged PI(4,5)P2 or PS lipids than PS/PC or neutral PC lipids. The equilibrium dissociation constant for the IMD–lipid interaction falls into the 78–170 μM range for all the lipids tested. The solvent accessibility of the fluorescence labels on the IMD during its binding to lipids is also reduced as the lipids become more negatively charged. Actin affects the IMD–lipid interaction, depending on its polymerization state. Monomeric actin partially disrupts the binding, while filamentous actin can further stabilize the IMD–lipid interaction

Bacterial and host determinants of MAL activation upon EPEC infection: the roles of Tir, ABRA, and FLRT3

Infection of host cells by pathogenic microbes triggers signal transduction pathways leading to a multitude of host cell responses including actin cytoskeletal re-arrangements and transcriptional programs. The diarrheagenic pathogens Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and the related Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) subvert the host-cell actin cytoskeleton to form attaching and effacing lesions on the surface of intestinal epithelial cells by injecting effector proteins via a type III secretion system. Here we use a MAL translocation assay to establish the effect of bacterial pathogens on host cell signaling to transcription factor activation. MAL is a cofactor of Serum response factor (SRF), a transcription factor with important roles in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. We show that EPEC induces nuclear accumulation of MAL-GFP. The translocated intimin receptor is essential for this process and phosphorylation of Tyrosine residues 454 and 474 is important. Using an expression screen we identify FLRT3, C22orf28 and TESK1 as novel activators of SRF. Importantly we demonstrate that ABRA (actin-binding Rho-activating protein, also known as STARS) is necessary for EPEC-induced nuclear accumulation of MAL and the novel SRF activator FLRT3, is a component of this pathway. We further demonstrate that ABRA is important for structural maintenance of EPEC pedestals. Our results uncover novel components in pathogen-activated cytoskeleton signalling to MAL activation