Primary varicose veins: Frequency, clinical significance and surgical treatment

INTRODUCTION According to the definition of the World Health Organization, varicose veins represent abnormally enlarged superficial veins having baggy or cylindrical shape. The most frequent cause of primary varicose veins is the insufficiency of long saphenous vein (LSV), but especially the basin of its connection with femoral vein and perforating veins. OBJECTIVE The objectives of these investigations were: the determination of insufficiency incidence of SSV in cases of LSV insufficiency; the establishment of association of insufficiency of perforating veins of the basin of LSV and SSV; the study of the results of surgical treatment of insufficiency and varicosity of both short and long saphenous veins. METHODS In this study, 100 patients (66 women and 34 men), average age 52.1 years, with clinical symptoms showing the insufficiency and varicosity of long saphenous vein with no change of deep vein system were examined. Ultrasonographic examinations were made using Color Doppler probes - 7.5 and 3.75 MHz (Toshiba Corevison SSA 350 A); the development of incompetence of long saphenous vein (LSV) and short saphenous vein (SSV) at the level of the junction as well as other incompetent valves were examined. The reflux was defined as a retrograde flow of the duration longer than 0.5 seconds. RESULTS The insufficiency of short saphenous vein was determined by ultrasonographic examination in 34%, while the insufficiency of perforating veins in 80% of patients. 40% of patients were operated (33.3% of females, and 52.9% of males). The most frequent indications for surgical treatment of superficial veins insufficiency were: strong varicosities, clear symptoms and signs, superficial thrombophlebitis and conditions after superficial thrombophlebitis. Surgical treatment was applied in 16% of patients due to recurrence in the basin of long saphenous vein, and in 6% of cases because of the recurrence in the basin of short saphenous vein. Data analysis failed to discover any statistically significant difference between the age of patients and varicosities in the basin of long saphenous vein as well as in the basin of short saphenous vein (51.98±9.97 years; 54.50±31.82 years; t=0.36; p>0.05), or any significant difference of BMI value, with regard to the obesity of patients and varicosities in the basin of long saphenous vein as well as in the basin of short saphenous vein (28.02±4.61 kg/m2; 24.50±6.36 kg/m2; t=0.50; p>0.05). No statistically significant correlation was found between Color Duplex findings of insufficiency of both long saphenous vein and short saphenous vein (p=-0.21 ; p>0.05), nor any significant correlation of Color Duplex findings of perforating veins insufficiency in the basin of long saphenous vein and short saphenous vein (p=-0.115; p>0.05). CONCLUSION The incidence of insufficiency is significant: approximately every third patient has short saphenous vein insufficiency, while three third of patients have perforating veins insufficiency. Color Duplex limb's veins ultrasonography is highly reliable method for the examination and study of superficial veins diseases, which is very important for preoperative decision-making and selection of surgical technique as well as for postoperative follow-up

Impact of intraoparetive parametres on survival of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is one of the most urgent surgical conditions with high mortality that has not been changed in decades. Between 1991-2001 total number of 1058 patients was operated at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Clinical Center of Serbia due to abdominal aortic aneurysm. Of this number, 288 patients underwent urgent surgical repair because of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The aim of this retrospective study was to show results of the early outcome of surgical treatment of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, and to define relevant intraoperative factors that influence their survival. There were 83% male and 17% female patients in the study, mean aged 67 years. Mean duration of surgical procedure was 190 minutes (75-420 min). Most common localization of aneurysm was infrarenal - in 74% of patients, then juxtarenal (12.3%). Suprarenal aneurysm was found in 6.8% of patients, as well as thoracoabdominal aneurysm (6.8%). Retroperitoneal rupture of aortic aneurysm was most common - in 65% of patients, then intraperotineal in 26%. Rare finding such as chronic rupture was found in 3.8%, aortocaval fistula in 3.2% and aorto-duodenal fistula in 0.6% of patients. Mean aortic cross-clamping time was 41.7 minutes (10-150 min). Average intraoperative systolic pressure in patients was 106.5 mmHg (40-160 mmHg). Mean intraoperative blood loss was 3700 ml (1400-8500 ml). Mean intraoperative diuresis was 473 ml (0-2100 ml). Tubular graft was implanted in 53% of patients, aortoiliac bifurcated graft in 32.8%. Aortobifemoral reconstruction was done in 14.2% of patients. These data refer to the patients that survived surgical procedure. Intrahospital mortality that included intraoperative and postoperative deaths was 53.7%. Therefore, 46.3% patients survived surgical treatment and were released from the hospital. Intraoperative mortality was 13.5%. Type of aneurysm had no influence on outcome of patients (p>0.05), as well as type of rupture and level of aortic cross-clamping. Aortic cross-clamping time was significantly shorter in survivors, and longest in patients that died intraoperatively (p<0.05). Intraoperative systolic tension value influenced the outcome in patients; it was significantly higher in survivors (p<0.01). Interposition of tubular graft gave better results compared with aorto-iliac and aorto-femoral reconstruction (p<0.01). Duration of surgery was significantly higher in patients with lethal outcome (p<0.05), as well as intraoperative blood loss (p<0.05). Intraoperative diuresis was significantly lower in patients with lethal outcome (p<0.05). Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm still remains one of the most dramatic surgical states with very high mortality. Important intraoperative factors that influence the outcome of surgical treatment can be defined. Therapeutic efforts should be concentrated on those factors that are possible to correct, which would hopefully lead to better survival of patients. Nevertheless, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and elective surgical intervention before rupture occurs should be the best solution for this complex problem