309 research outputs found
Induced Ferromagnetism due to Superconductivity in Superconductor-Ferromagnet structures
We consider a superconductor-ferromagnet (S/F) structure and assume that
above the superconducting transition temperature the magnetic moment
exists only in F. {In a simple model of the ferromagnet (the exchange field is
of the ferromagnetic type for all energies)}we show by an explicit calculation
that below the magnetic moment may penetrate the superconductor. {In
this model} its direction in S is opposite {to the magnetization of free
electrons} in the ferromagnet. The magnetization spreads over a large distance
which is of the order of the superconducting coherence length and can
much exceed the ferromagnet film thickness. At the same time the magnetic
moment in the ferromagnet is reduced. This inverse proximity effect may explain
the reduction in magnetization observed in recent experiments and may lead to a
strong interaction between the ferromagnetic layers in F/S/F structures.Comment: 5 pages, 2 figures. revised and longer version. to be published in
Phys. Rev.
Local density of states in superconductor-strong ferromagnet structures
We study the dependence of the local density of states (LDOS) on coordinates
for a superconductor-ferromagnet (S/F) bilayer and a S/F/S structure assuming
that the exchange energy h in the ferromagnet is sufficiently large: where is the elastic relaxation time. This limit cannot be
described by the Usadel equation and we solve the more general Eilenberger
equation. We demonstrate that, in the main approximation in the parameter , the proximity effect does not lead to a modification of the LDOS
in the S/F system and a non-trivial dependence on coordinates shows up in next
orders in In the S/F/S sandwich the correction to the LDOS is
nonzero in the main approximation and depends on the phase difference between
the superconductors. We also calculate the superconducting critical temperature
for the bilayered system and show that it does not depend on the
exchange energy of the ferromagnet in the limit of large h and a thick F layer.Comment: 9 pages, 5 figure
Correspondence between bulk equilibrium spin-currents and edge spin accumulation in wires with spin-orbit coupling
We demonstrate that the interplay of Zeeman and spin-orbit coupling fields in
a 1D wire leads to an equilibrium spin current that manifests itself in a spin
accumulation at the wire ends with a polarization perpendicular to both fields.
This is a universal property that occurs in the normal and superconducting
state independently of the degree of disorder. We find that the edge spin
polarization transverse to the Zeeman field is strongly enhanced in the
superconducting state when the Zeeman energy is of the order of the
superconducting gap. By calculating the space resolved magnetization response
of the wire we demonstrate that the transverse component of the spin at the
wire edges can be much larger than the one parallel to the field. This result
generalizes the well established theory of the Knight-shift in superconductors
to the case of finite systems.Comment: 5 pages, 4 figure
Impurity-assisted Andreev reflection at a spin-active half-metal-superconductor interface
The Andreev reflection amplitude at a clean interface between a half-metallic
ferromagnet (H) and a superconductor (S) for which the half metal's
magnetization has a gradient perpendicular to the interface is proportional to
the excitation energy and vanishes at [B\'{e}ri
{\em et al.}, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 79}, 024517 (2009)]. Here we show that the
presence of impurities at or in the immediate vicinity of the HS interface
leads to a finite Andreev reflection amplitude at . This
impurity-assisted Andreev reflection dominates the low-bias conductance of a HS
junction and the Josephson current of an SHS junction in the long-junction
limit.Comment: 12 pages, 2 figure
Spin polarization and orbital effects in superconductor-ferromagnet structures
We study theoretically spontaneous currents and magnetic field induced in a
superconductor-ferromagnet (S-F) bilayer due to direct and inverse proximity
effects. The induced currents {are Meissner currents that appear even in the
absence of an external magnetic field due to the magnetic moment in the
ferromagnet }and {to the magnetization } in the superconductor . The latter is
induced by the inverse proximity effect over a distance of the order of the
superconducting correlation length . On the other hand the magnetic
induction , caused by Meissner currents, penetrates the S film over the
London length . Even though usually exceeds
considerably the correlation length, the amplitude and sign of at distances
much larger than depends crucially on the strength of the exchange
energy in the ferromagnet and on the magnetic moment induced in the in the S
layer.Comment: 12 pages, 3 figure
- …