811 research outputs found

    The cost-effectiveness of removing television advertising of high-fat and/or high-sugar food and beverages to Australian children

    Full text link
    Objective: To model the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of banning television (TV) advertisements in Australia for energy-dense, nutrient-poor food and beverages during children\u27s peak viewing times.Methods: Benefits were modelled as changes in body mass index (BMI) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) saved. Intervention costs (AUD)werecomparedwithfuturehealth−carecostoffsetsfromreducedprevalenceofobesity−relatedhealthconditions.ChangesinBMIwereassumedtobemaintainedthroughtoadulthood.Thecomparatorwascurrentpractice,thereferenceyearwas2001,andthediscountrateforcostsandbenefitswas3) were compared with future health-care cost offsets from reduced prevalence of obesity-related health conditions. Changes in BMI were assumed to be maintained through to adulthood. The comparator was current practice, the reference year was 2001, and the discount rate for costs and benefits was 3%. The impact of the withdrawal of non-core food and beverage advertisements on children\u27s actual food consumption was drawn from the best available evidence (a randomized controlled trial of advertisement exposure and food consumption). Supporting evidence was found in ecological relationships between TV advertising and childhood obesity, and from the effects of marketing bans on other products. A Working Group of stakeholders provided input into decisions surrounding the modelling assumptions and second-stage filters of \u27strength of evidence\u27, \u27equity\u27, \u27acceptability to stakeholders\u27, \u27feasibility of implementation\u27, \u27sustainability\u27 and \u27side-effects\u27.Results: The intervention had a gross incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AUD 3.70 (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 2.40,2.40, 7.70) per DALY. Total DALYs saved were 37 000 (95% UI 16 000, 59 000). When the present value of potential savings in future health-care costs was considered (AUD300m(95 300m (95% UI 130m, $480m), the intervention was \u27dominant\u27, because it resulted in both a health gain and a cost offset compared with current practice.Conclusions: Although recognizing the limitations of the available evidence, restricting TV food advertising to children would be one of the most cost-effective population-based interventions available to governments today. Despite its economic credentials from a public health perspective, the initiative is strongly opposed by food and advertising industries and is under review by the current Australian government.<br /

    What is the impact of food reformulation on individual’s behaviour, nutrient intakes and health status? A systematic review of empirical evidence

    Get PDF
    Food reformulation aimed at improving the nutritional properties of food products has long been viewed as a promising public health strategy to tackle poor nutrition and obesity. This paper presents a review of the empirical evidence (i.e. modelling studies were excluded) on the impact of food reformulation on food choices, nutrient intakes and health status, based on a systematic search of Medline, Embase, Global Health, and sources of grey literature. Fifty-nine studies (in 35 papers) were included in the review. Most studies examined food choices (n=27) and dietary intakes (n=26). The nutrients most frequently studied were sodium (n=32) and trans-fatty acids (TFA, n=13). Reformulated products were generally accepted and purchased by consumers, which led to improved nutrient intakes in 73% of studies. We also conducted two meta-analyses showing, respectively, a -0.57g/day [95%CI -0.89, -0.25] reduction in salt intake, and an effect size for TFA intake reduction of -1.2, 95% [CI -1.79, -0.61]. Only six studies examined effects on health outcomes, with studies on TFA reformulation showing overall improvement in cardiovascular risk factors. For other nutrients, it remains unclear whether observed improvements in food choices or nutrient intakes may have led to an improvement in health outcomes

    How children eat may contribute to rising levels of obesity children's eating behaviours: An intergenerational study of family influences

    Get PDF
    The term ‘obesogenic environment’ is rapidly becoming part of common phraseology. However, the influence of the family and the home environment on children's eating behaviours is little understood. Research that explores the impact of this micro environment and intergenerational influences affecting children's eating behaviours is long overdue. A qualitative, grounded theory approach, incorporating focus groups and semi-structured interviews, was used to investigate the family environment and specifically, the food culture of different generations within families. What emerged was a substantive theory based on ‘ordering of eating’ that explains differences in eating behaviours within and between families. Whereas at one time family eating was highly ordered and structured, typified by the grandparent generation, nowadays family eating behaviours are more haphazard and less ordered, evidenced by the way the current generation of children eat. Most importantly, in families with an obese child eating is less ordered compared with those families with a normal weight child. Ordering of eating' is a unique concept to emerge. It shows that an understanding of the eating process is crucial to the development and improvement of interventions targeted at addressing childhood obesity within the family context
    • …
    corecore