PELAKSANAAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN (Corporate Social Responsibility) SEBAGAI SALAH SATU INSTRUMEN DALAM PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH

Given the limited funds of regional development, it is expected that CSR activities can be usedas an instrument in the regional development. This requires commitment from both parties forcorporate and government to formulate a clear policy, in accordance with the competenciesthey possess. So that CSR is not only beneficial to the corporation but also felt by the peopleand government in regional development

PENGATURAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN (Corporate Social Responsibility) DI BIDANG PERTAMBANGAN DALAM KONTEKS HUKUM PERUSAHAAN DI INDONESIA

Rule of article 74 UUPT have regulation of CSR of Voluntary become mandatory. Philosophically that arrangement is based of article 33 paragraph (3) and (4) UUD 1945, while from its empirical fact is not quit of environmental impact and damage which generated by activity mining of it self. From result of research also showing that rule of regulation related to mining area it self have contained principle of CSR. Key word : corporate social responsibilit

The Anomaly of the Village Government in Establishing Village Owned Enterprise

Village Owned Enterprise is an important part of the form of empowerment economic community at the village. Given, the urgency of the existence of Village Owned Enterprise, the government through the Regulation of Ministry of Villages, Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration No. 5 of 2015 stated that one of the priorities of the use of village funds is for the establishment and development of Village Owned Enterprise. While the mechanism of establishment of Village Owned Enterprise is based on the result of village consultative meeting involving element of village government, element of village consultative body, and elements of community figures. The result of the village consultative meeting is implemented in form Village Regulation. However, it causes anomaly related to the status of Village Owned Enterprise, because it does not have to be legal entity in Regulation of Ministry of Villages meanwhile it has to be legal entity in Regulation of Minister of Home Affairs No. 39 of 2010 on Village Owned Enterprise

Registration of Limited Partnership after the Publication of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 of 2018 (Study in Pekanbaru City)

Business entity is a form of company established by 2 (two) or more people with the pooling of capital to achieve certain goals, whichone business entity that is widely used by society is limited partnership. A limited partnership is a form of company that established by one or several people, fully responsible to one and one or more people as a party to release money to another party. Associated with limited partnership, currently Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 of 2018 has been issued concerning the Registration of Limited Partnership Fellowships, that each limited partnership must register electronically, especially limited partnership that has been registered through the court, must be re-registered through an electronic administration system also called registration of registration. The problems discussed in this study are a). How to carry out about registration of limited partnership based on PermenkumhamRegulation Number 17 of 2018 (Pekanbaru City Study), b). What are the juridical consequences for limited partnership which does not register in accordance with Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 of 2018. The research method used in this study is an empirical research method with an emphasis on reality in the field, then associated with aspects of law or legislation in effect with regard to the object of research. The results of this study are the implementation of registration of limited partnership based on Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 of 2018 there are a decrease in the interest of business actors to establish limited partnership, because business operators object to the licensing system which is considered detrimental to the company. Then the juridical consequences that occur when a limited partnership does not record registration is that the limited partnership frozen and considered a civil alliance in general. The suggestion in this research is that the government should conduct a review such as conducting a review such as conducting research, as well as conducting a trial run in advance whether these rules can be established or accepted in business activities. Then the regulation in Minister of Law and Human Rights needs to contain sanctions against business entities so that law enforcement can be carried out properly

Binding of Third Party Guarantee Objects in Financing Agreement in PT Multindo Auto Finance in Padang City

Financial institutions both banks and non-banks play an important role. Financial Institutions is one non-bank institution that is developing rapidly. Consumer financing is one form of financing institutions that is often encountered. The financing institution in practice uses Guarantees provided by the debtor are not entirely the debtor's personal property, but are collateral which is the property of third parties submitted as collateral. Default is one that can occur during the ongoing financing and a third party as the owner of the Guarantee can also be made compared to an increase in default. In the financing agreement the parties only consist of creditors and debtors. The formulation of the problem in this return is how the binding of third parties as collateral in spending and how legal protection to third parties The research method used is a sociological juridical method, namely discussing the problem by looking at applicable legal norms then discussing with legal facts that in the field. The study was conducted at PT Multindo Auto Finance Kota Padang. Binding of objects belonging to third parties is done with a letter of release of vehicle ownership rights and financing agreements are only signed by creditors and debtors. One of the legal protection for guarantees is through fiduciary. Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18 / PUU / XVII / 2019 regarding the implementation of fiduciary executions that were not voluntarily approved by the debtor, the procedure must be carried out to execute a court decision with permanent legal force. Protection of the owner