Gastrointestinal Perforations: Examining the Overlooked Unintentional Consequences of Our Nation’s Epidemic of Antibiotic Exposure

Objective: More than 266 million courses of antibiotics are dispensed to outpatients annually in the US, with the rising elderly population consuming a substantial number of antibiotics. At least 30% of these antibiotics prescribed are unnecessary. Alterations in gut microbiome are known to cause stomach and small intestine (SSI) perforations. However, the impact of antibiotic exposure outcomes of SSI perforations among the elderly has not been studied. We examined the relationship between antibiotic exposure, as a proxy for microbiome modulation, and SSI perforation outcomes in a nationwide sample of elderly patients. Methods: A 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (2009-2011) was queried to identify patients with SSI perforations. Previous outpatient antibiotic exposure (0-30, 31-60, 61-90 days prior to admission) was assessed. Clinical characteristics were compared between no previous antibiotic exposure (NPA) and previous antibiotic exposure (PA) patients. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and 30-day readmission. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Results: Overall, 401 patients ≥ 65 years had SSI perforations (68.3% with NPA and 31.7 % with PA). Mean age (± SD) was 80 years (± 8). Overall in-hospital mortality was 13%. There was a significant difference in the rates of mortality (12% in NPA vs. 18 % in 0-30 days PA, 17% 31-60 days PA, and 8% 61-90 days PA, P= 0.002). After adjustment of other factors, a trend toward increased in-hospital mortality was observed among patients in 0-30 days PA (odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.9, 4.7) and was significantly associated with ICU admission (OR 4.3, 95% CI (1.8, 10.2). Conclusion: Recent antibiotic use increases illness severity and may increase mortality among elderly patients with SSI perforations. Exposure to antibiotics, one of the most modifiable determinants of microbiota, should be minimized in the outpatient setting

The Effect of Oral Antibiotics on the Development of Community Acquired Clostridium Difficile Colitis in Medicare Beneficiaries

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is increasingly prevalent among community dwelling Americans. Older Americans are particularly vulnerable to community-acquired Clostridium difficile (CACD), in part to increasing use of antibiotics. We studied the association between outpatient antibiotics and CACD among Medicare beneficiaries. Case-control study utilizing a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries (2009-2011). Patients with CACD severe enough to warrant hospitalization were identified by a primary diagnosis code for CDI and no exposure to a healthcare environment within 90-days of admission. 1,514 CACD cases were matched to ten controls each on birth year and sex. Potential controls with exposure to healthcare environment were excluded. Outpatient oral antibiotic exposure was classified into three groups: ≤30 days, 31-60 days, or 61-90 days prior to case subject’s index admission. Metronidazole and Vancomycin were excluded because they are used to treat CDI. Multivariable models were utilized to determine the independent effect of antibiotics on the development of CACD while controlling for several patient associated characteristics. Cases of CACD had more outpatient antibiotic exposure in each time period examined: ≤30 days = 40.0% vs 8.4%; 31-60 = 10.7% vs 5.0%; and 61-90 = 5.5% vs 4.4% (all p-values \u3c 0.05). Subjects exposed to antibiotics ≤30 days prior to admission had a markedly higher risk of being admitted with CACD compared with those not exposed (OR 8.09, 95% CI 7.13, 9.19). Similarly, subjects taking antibiotics 31-60 days and 61-90 days prior to admission had increased risk of CDI admission (OR 3.65, 95% CI 3.02, 4.41) and (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.61, 2.63) respectively. Recent exposure to outpatient oral antibiotics increases the risk of CACD among community dwelling elderly with the risk persisting as long as 90 days after exposure. Inappropriate antibiotic usage must be minimized and older Americans who require outpatient antibiotic treatment may warrant close observation for signs of CDI

Study design and rationale for a randomized controlled trial to assess effectiveness of stochastic vibrotactile mattress stimulation versus standard non-oscillating crib mattress for treating hospitalized opioid-exposed newborns

The incidence of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) continues to rise and there remains a critical need to develop non-pharmacological interventions for managing opioid withdrawal in newborns. Objective physiologic markers of opioid withdrawal in the newborn remain elusive. Optimal treatment strategies for improving short-term clinical outcomes and promoting healthy neurobehavioral development have yet to be defined. This dual-site randomized controlled trial (NCT02801331) is designed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of stochastic vibrotactile stimulation (SVS) for reducing withdrawal symptoms, pharmacological treatment, and length of hospitalization, and for improving developmental outcomes in opioid-exposed neonates. Hospitalized newborns (n = 230) receiving standard clinical care for prenatal opioid exposure will be randomly assigned within 48-hours of birth to a crib with either: 1) Intervention (SVS) mattress: specially-constructed SVS crib mattress that delivers gentle vibrations (30-60 Hz, ~12 mum RMS surface displacement) at 3-hr intervals; or 2) Control mattress (treatment as usual; TAU): non-oscillating hospital-crib mattress. Infants will be studied throughout their hospitalization and post discharge to 14-months of age. The study will compare clinical measures (i.e., withdrawal scores, cumulative dose and duration of medications, velocity of weight gain) and characteristic progression of physiologic activity (i.e., limb movement, cardio-respiratory, temperature, blood-oxygenation) throughout hospitalization between opioid-exposed infants who receive SVS and those who receive TAU. Developmental outcomes (i.e., physical, social, emotional and cognitive) within the first year of life will be evaluated between the two study groups. Findings from this randomized controlled trial will determine whether SVS reduces in-hospital severity of NAS, improves physiologic function, and promotes healthy development

Identifying the fundamental structures and processes of care contributing to emergency general surgery quality using a mixed-methods Donabedian approach

BACKGROUND: Acute Care Surgery (ACS) was developed as a structured, team-based approach to providing round-the-clock emergency general surgery (EGS) care for adult patients needing treatment for diseases such as cholecystitis, gastrointestinal perforation, and necrotizing fasciitis. Lacking any prior evidence on optimizing outcomes for EGS patients, current implementation of ACS models has been idiosyncratic. We sought to use a Donabedian approach to elucidate potential EGS structures and processes that might be associated with improved outcomes as an initial step in designing the optimal model of ACS care for EGS patients. METHODS: We developed and implemented a national survey of hospital-level EGS structures and processes by surveying surgeons or chief medical officers regarding hospital-level structures and processes that directly or indirectly impacted EGS care delivery in 2015. These responses were then anonymously linked to 2015 data from the American Hospital Association (AHA) annual survey, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review claims (MedPAR), 17 State Inpatient Databases (SIDs) using AHA unique identifiers (AHAID). This allowed us to combine hospital-level data, as reported in our survey or to the AHA, to patient-level data in an effort to further examine the role of EGS structures and processes on EGS outcomes. We describe the multi-step, iterative process utilizing the Donabedian framework for quality measurement that serves as a foundation for later work in this project. RESULTS: Hospitals that responded to the survey were primarily non-governmental and located in urban settings. A plurality of respondent hospitals had fewer than 100 inpatient beds. A minority of the hospitals had medical school affiliations. DISCUSSION: Our results will enable us to develop a measure of preparedness for delivering EGS care in the US, provide guidance for regionalized care models for EGS care, tiering of ACS programs based on the robustness of their EGS structures and processes and the quality of their outcomes, and formulate triage guidelines based on patient risk factors and severity of EGS disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our work provides a template for team science applicable to research efforts combining primary data collection (i.e., that derived from our survey) with existing national data sources (i.e., SIDs and MedPAR)

The impact of acute care surgery on appendicitis outcomes: Results from a national sample of university-affiliated hospitals

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency general surgery (EGS) in the United States. We examined the role of acute care surgery (ACS) on interventions and outcomes for acute appendicitis at a national sample of university-affiliated hospitals. METHODS: We surveyed senior surgeons responsible for EGS coverage at University HealthSystems Consortium hospitals, representing more than 90% of university-affiliated hospitals in the United States. The survey elicited data on resources allocated for EGS during 2013. Responses were linked to University HealthSystems Consortium outcomes data by unique hospital identifiers. Patients treated at hospitals reporting hybrid models for EGS coverage were excluded. Differences in interventions and outcomes between patients with acute appendicitis treated at ACS hospitals versus hospitals with a general surgeon on-call model (GSOC) were analyzed using univariate comparisons and multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for patient demographics, clinical acuity, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: We found 122 hospitals meeting criteria for analysis where 2,565 patients were treated for acute appendicitis. Forty-eight percent of hospitals had an ACS model (n = 1,414), and 52% had a GSOC model (n = 1,151). Hospitals with ACS models were more likely to treat minority patients than those with GSOC models. Patients treated at ACS hospitals were more likely to undergo laparoscopic appendectomy. In multivariable modeling of patients who had surgery (n = 2,258), patients treated at ACS hospitals had 1.86 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.80) greater odds of undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. CONCLUSION: In an era when laparoscopic appendectomy is increasingly accepted for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis, particularly in low-risk patients, it is concerning that patients treated at GSOC model hospitals are more likely to undergo traditional open surgery at the time of presentation. Furthermore, hospitals with ACS are functioning as safety-net hospitals for vulnerable patients with acute appendicitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV

Adherence to 20 Emergency General Surgery Best Practices: Results of a National Survey

OBJECTIVE: To examine national adherence to emergency general surgery (EGS) best practices. BACKGROUND: There is a national crisis in access to high-quality care for general surgery emergencies. Acute care surgery (ACS), a specialty leveraging strengths of trauma systems, may ameliorate this crisis. A critical component of trauma care is adherence to clinical guidelines. We previously established best practices for EGS using RAND Appropriateness Methodology and pilot data. METHOD: A hybrid (postal/electronic) questionnaire measuring adherence to 20 EGS best practices was administered to respondents overseeing EGS at all eligible adult acute care general hospitals across the US (N = 2811). Questionnaire responses were analyzed using bivariate methods and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The response rate was 60.1%. Adherence ranged from 8.5% for having an EGS registry to 86.2% for auditing 30-day postoperative readmissions. Adherence was higher for practices not restricted to EGS (eg, auditing readmissions) compared to EGS-specific practices (eg, registry, activation system). Adopting an ACS model of care increased adherence to practices for deferring elective cases; tiering urgent operations; following National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines; reversing anticoagulants; auditing returns to intensive care, time to evaluation, time to operation, and time to source control; and having transfer agreements to receive patients, ICU admission protocols, as well as EGS-specific activation systems, outpatient clinics, morbidity and mortality conferences, and registries. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial room for performance improvement, and adopting an ACS model predicts better performance. This novel overview of adherence to EGS best practices will enable surgeons and policymakers to address variations in EGS care nationally

Predictors and outcomes of readmission for Clostridium difficile in a national sample of medicare beneficiaries

BACKGROUND: Rates of Clostridium difficile (CD) infections are increasing. Elderly patients may be at particular risk of recurrent CD infection. Little is known about the risk for CD readmission specifically in this age group. METHODS: A 5% random sample of Medicare data (2009-2011) was queried for patients surviving a hospitalization for CD by ICD-9 code. Demographic (age, sex, gender), clinical (Elixhauser index, gastrointestinal comorbidities), and hospitalization (length of stay, ICU admission) characteristics as well as exposure to antibiotics and interim non-CD hospitalization were compared for those with and without a readmission for CD. A multivariable survival analysis was used to determine predictors of readmission. RESULTS: Of 7,564 patients surviving a CD hospitalization, 8.5% were readmitted with CD in a median of 25 days (interquartile range (IQR) 14-57). In multivariable survival analyses, interim non-CD hospital exposure was the strongest predictor of CD readmission (hazard ration (HR) 3.75 95%, confidence interval (CI) 3.2-4.42). Oral and intravenous/intramuscular (IV/IM) antibiotic use, Elixhauser index, and CD as the primary diagnosis also increased the risk of CD readmission. Discharge to hospice, long-term care or a skilled nursing facility decreased the odds of CD readmission. CONCLUSION: Hospital exposure and antibiotic use put elderly patients at risk of CD readmission. Exposure to these factors should be minimized in the immediate post discharge period

The current State of the acute care surgery workforce: A boots on the ground perspective

BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery (ACS) was proposed to address a general surgery workforce crisis; however, the ACS workforce composition is unknown. A national survey was conducted to determine the differences in the emergency general surgery (EGS) workforce between ACS and non-ACS hospitals. METHODS: The American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey of Hospitals database was queried to identify acute care general hospitals. A hybrid mail/electronic survey was sent to 2811 acute care hospitals that met the inclusion criteria of hospitals that care for adult patients ( \u3e /=18 years old) with an emergency room (ER), \u3e /= 1 operating room (OR), and 24-h ER access. Hospitals were queried on whether they utilized an ACS model. The workforce composition among ACS and non-ACS hospitals was evaluated using X(2) tests, t tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: Survey response was 60% (N=1690). ACS hospitals had a higher proportion of emergency surgeons who were female (20% vs. 14%, p \u3c 0.0001), newly-trained (17% vs 10%, p \u3c 0.0001), critical care trained (78% vs. 31%, p \u3c 0.0001), and who had an additional degree (35% vs. 13%, p \u3c 0.0001). More ACS hospitals had 24/7 in-house OR nursing staff (72% vs. 15%, p \u3c 0.0001) and ancillary staff. CONCLUSIONS: ACS and non-ACS hospitals differ in their surgical workforce. It is clear that ACS hospitals have more human capital, which suggests that ACS hospitals may require more dedicated resources compared to non-ACS hospitals

The influence of payor status on outcomes associated with surgical repair of upper gastrointestinal perforations due to peptic ulcer disease in the United States

BACKGROUND: An association between lack of insurance and inferior outcomes has been well described for a number of surgical emergencies, yet little is known about the relationship of payor status and outcomes of patients undergoing emergent surgical repair for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) perforations. We evaluated the association of payor status and in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing emergency surgery for UGI perforations in the United States. METHODS: Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried to identify patients between 18 and 64 years of age who underwent emergent (open or laparoscopic) repair for UGI perforations secondary to peptic ulcer disease (2010-2014). Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were major and minor postoperative complications. The main predictor outcome was insurance status (Private, Medicaid, Uninsured). Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Data were weighted to provide national estimates. RESULTS: 21,005 patients underwent surgical repair for UGI perforations. Patients with private insurance represented the largest payor group (47%). After adjustment of other factors, payor status was not a statistically significant predictor of in-hospital mortality (Medicaid vs. Private: [OR] 1.1; 95% [CI] 0.67-1.81; Uninsured vs. Private: OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.52-1.61). However, payor status remained a statistically significant predictor of major postoperative complications (Medicaid vs. Private [OR] 1.4; 95% CI 1.1, 1.8; Uninsured vs. Private [OR]1.2, 95% CI 0.9, 1.5) and minor postoperative complications (Medicaid vs. Private [OR] 1.4; 95% CI 1.1, 1.9; Uninsured vs. Private [OR]1.2, 95% CI 0.9, 1.6). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency surgery for UGI perforations is associated with high mortality and morbidity across all payor classes; however, Medicaid is a predictor for both major and minor postoperative complications. Preventing perforation through preventative measures will be key to reducing the burden of peptic ulcer disease across all populations

Geographic Diffusion and Implementation of Acute Care Surgery: An Uneven Solution to the National Emergency General Surgery Crisis

Importance: Owing to lack of adequate emergency care infrastructure and decline in general surgery workforce, the United States faces a crisis in access to emergency general surgery (EGS) care. Acute care surgery (ACS), an organized system of trauma, general surgery, and critical care, is a proposed solution; however, ACS diffusion remains poorly understood. Objective: To investigate geographic diffusion of ACS models of care and characterize the communities in which ACS implementation is lagging. Design, Setting, and Participants: A national survey on EGS practices was developed, tested, and administered at all 2811 US acute care hospitals providing EGS to adults between August 2015 and October 2015. Surgeons responsible for EGS coverage at these hospitals were approached. If these surgeons failed to respond to the initial survey implementation, secondary surgeons or chief medical officers at hospitals with only 1 general surgeon were approached. Interventions: Survey responses on ACS implementation were linked with geocoded hospital data and national census data to determine geographic diffusion of and access to ACS. Main Outcomes and Measures: We measured the distribution of hospitals with ACS models of care vs those without over time (diffusion) and by US counties characterized by sociodemographic characteristics of county residents (access). Results: Survey response rate was 60% (n = 1690); 272 responding hospitals had implemented ACS by 2015, steadily increasing from 34 in 2001 to 125 in 2010. Acute care surgery implementation has not been uniform. Rural regions have limited ACS access, with hospitals in counties with greater than the 75th percentile population having 5.4 times higher odds (95% CI, 1.66-7.35) of implementing ACS than hospitals in counties with less than 25th percentile population. Communities with greater percentages of adults without a college degree also have limited ACS access (OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.81-6.48). However, incorporating EGS into ACS models may be a potential equalizer for poor, black, and Hispanic communities. Conclusions and Relevance: Understanding and addressing gaps in ACS implementation across communities will be crucial to ensuring health equity for US residents experiencing general surgery emergencies